Influence of Artificial Intelligence on Credit Risk Assessment in Banking Sector

Michael Brown
{"title":"Influence of Artificial Intelligence on Credit Risk Assessment in Banking Sector","authors":"Michael Brown","doi":"10.47604/ijmrm.2641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The aim of the study was to examine the influence of artificial intelligence on credit risk assessment in banking sector. \nMethodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. \nFindings: The study found that AI-driven models demonstrate superior performance in identifying risky borrowers and capturing complex credit risk patterns compared to traditional methods. Additionally, the integration of explainable AI (XAI) techniques has enhanced transparency and interpretability in credit risk assessment processes, facilitating better understanding among stakeholders and improving decision-making transparency. \nUnique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Decision theory & technology acceptance model (TAM) may be used to anchor future studies on influence of artificial intelligence on credit risk assessment in banking sector. Continuously invest in research and development to advance the theoretical understanding of AI-driven credit risk assessment models. This includes exploring the integration of machine learning with behavioral economics theories to better predict borrower behavior and default probabilities. Encourage banks to adopt a hybrid approach that combines the strengths of AI-driven models with human expertise. Develop comprehensive regulatory guidelines and standards to govern the use of AI in credit risk assessment and ensure ethical and responsible practices. This includes establishing transparent model validation and governance frameworks to mitigate the risks of algorithmic bias, data privacy violations, and discriminatory lending practices. Regulatory authorities should also promote industry-wide collaboration and knowledge sharing to foster innovation while safeguarding consumer interests and financial stability.","PeriodicalId":492432,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Modern Risk Management","volume":"69 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Modern Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47604/ijmrm.2641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to examine the influence of artificial intelligence on credit risk assessment in banking sector. Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: The study found that AI-driven models demonstrate superior performance in identifying risky borrowers and capturing complex credit risk patterns compared to traditional methods. Additionally, the integration of explainable AI (XAI) techniques has enhanced transparency and interpretability in credit risk assessment processes, facilitating better understanding among stakeholders and improving decision-making transparency. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Decision theory & technology acceptance model (TAM) may be used to anchor future studies on influence of artificial intelligence on credit risk assessment in banking sector. Continuously invest in research and development to advance the theoretical understanding of AI-driven credit risk assessment models. This includes exploring the integration of machine learning with behavioral economics theories to better predict borrower behavior and default probabilities. Encourage banks to adopt a hybrid approach that combines the strengths of AI-driven models with human expertise. Develop comprehensive regulatory guidelines and standards to govern the use of AI in credit risk assessment and ensure ethical and responsible practices. This includes establishing transparent model validation and governance frameworks to mitigate the risks of algorithmic bias, data privacy violations, and discriminatory lending practices. Regulatory authorities should also promote industry-wide collaboration and knowledge sharing to foster innovation while safeguarding consumer interests and financial stability.
人工智能对银行业信用风险评估的影响
目的:本研究旨在探讨人工智能对银行业信贷风险评估的影响。研究方法:本研究采用案头研究法。案头研究设计通常被称为二手数据收集。这主要是从现有资源中收集数据,因为与实地研究相比,它具有成本低的优势。我们目前的研究调查了已经出版的研究和报告,因为这些数据很容易通过在线期刊和图书馆获取。研究结果研究发现,与传统方法相比,人工智能驱动的模型在识别高风险借款人和捕捉复杂信贷风险模式方面表现优异。此外,可解释人工智能(XAI)技术的整合提高了信贷风险评估流程的透明度和可解释性,促进了利益相关者之间的更好理解,并提高了决策透明度。对理论、实践和政策的独特贡献:决策理论和技术接受模型(TAM)可用于未来有关人工智能对银行业信贷风险评估影响的研究。持续投入研发,推进对人工智能驱动的信用风险评估模型的理论理解。这包括探索将机器学习与行为经济学理论相结合,以更好地预测借款人的行为和违约概率。鼓励银行采用混合方法,将人工智能驱动模型的优势与人类的专业知识相结合。制定全面的监管指南和标准,以管理人工智能在信用风险评估中的使用,并确保道德和负责任的做法。这包括建立透明的模型验证和治理框架,以降低算法偏见、数据隐私侵犯和歧视性贷款行为的风险。监管当局还应促进全行业的合作和知识共享,以促进创新,同时维护消费者利益和金融稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信