Comparison of Anterior versus Posterior Fixation in Traumatic Subaxial Cervical Spine Subluxation in Terms of Intraoperative Blood Loss, Surgical Time, and Length of Hospital Stay: A Prospective Observational Study

IF 0.2 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Muhammad Asif Shabbir, Shuja Ikram, Ahtesham Khizar, Inaam Elahi, Abdul Ghafoor, Muhammad Waqas Umer
{"title":"Comparison of Anterior versus Posterior Fixation in Traumatic Subaxial Cervical Spine Subluxation in Terms of Intraoperative Blood Loss, Surgical Time, and Length of Hospital Stay: A Prospective Observational Study","authors":"Muhammad Asif Shabbir, Shuja Ikram, Ahtesham Khizar, Inaam Elahi, Abdul Ghafoor, Muhammad Waqas Umer","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1786688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Objective The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of anterior versus posterior fixation for traumatic subaxial cervical spine subluxation in terms of mean intraoperative blood loss, surgical time, and length of hospital stay.\n Materials and Methods A prospective observational study was conducted from August 25, 2022 to August 24, 2023 at the Department of Neurosurgery, Punjab Institute of Neurosciences, Lahore, Pakistan, including 60 patients (30 in each group) fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Group A had anterior cervical fixation, while group B underwent posterior cervical fixation. Patients were monitored for intraoperative blood loss, surgical time, and length of hospital stay. All the results were collected and recorded on a proforma.\n Results The mean age of the patients in group A was 45.40 ± 3.75 years and that in group B was 45.50 ± 4.13 years. In all, 48.8% (n = 21) were males and 52.9% (n = 9) were females in group A, while 51.2% (n = 22) were males and 47.1% (n = 8) were females in group B. The mean intraoperative blood loss was 71.60 ± 0.77 mL in group A and 101.76 ± 0.85 mL in group B. The mean surgical time was 72.73 ± 0.98 minutes in group A and 94.73 ± 0.58 minutes in group B. The mean length of hospital stay was 7.63 ± 0.55 days in group A and 12.80 ± 0.71 days in group B.\n Conclusion It was concluded that the anterior approach is better than the posterior approach for traumatic subaxial cervical subluxation spine in terms of low blood loss, less surgical time, and reduced hospital stay.","PeriodicalId":43198,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Neurotrauma","volume":"90 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Neurotrauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1786688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of anterior versus posterior fixation for traumatic subaxial cervical spine subluxation in terms of mean intraoperative blood loss, surgical time, and length of hospital stay. Materials and Methods A prospective observational study was conducted from August 25, 2022 to August 24, 2023 at the Department of Neurosurgery, Punjab Institute of Neurosciences, Lahore, Pakistan, including 60 patients (30 in each group) fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Group A had anterior cervical fixation, while group B underwent posterior cervical fixation. Patients were monitored for intraoperative blood loss, surgical time, and length of hospital stay. All the results were collected and recorded on a proforma. Results The mean age of the patients in group A was 45.40 ± 3.75 years and that in group B was 45.50 ± 4.13 years. In all, 48.8% (n = 21) were males and 52.9% (n = 9) were females in group A, while 51.2% (n = 22) were males and 47.1% (n = 8) were females in group B. The mean intraoperative blood loss was 71.60 ± 0.77 mL in group A and 101.76 ± 0.85 mL in group B. The mean surgical time was 72.73 ± 0.98 minutes in group A and 94.73 ± 0.58 minutes in group B. The mean length of hospital stay was 7.63 ± 0.55 days in group A and 12.80 ± 0.71 days in group B. Conclusion It was concluded that the anterior approach is better than the posterior approach for traumatic subaxial cervical subluxation spine in terms of low blood loss, less surgical time, and reduced hospital stay.
前路与后路固定治疗创伤性颈椎轴下脱位在术中失血量、手术时间和住院时间方面的比较:前瞻性观察研究
目的 本研究旨在从术中平均失血量、手术时间和住院时间等方面比较前路固定与后路固定治疗外伤性颈椎轴下脱位的效果。材料与方法 一项前瞻性观察研究于 2022 年 8 月 25 日至 2023 年 8 月 24 日在巴基斯坦拉合尔旁遮普神经科学研究所神经外科进行,包括 60 名符合纳入标准的患者(每组 30 人)。A 组采用颈椎前路固定术,B 组采用颈椎后路固定术。对患者的术中失血量、手术时间和住院时间进行了监测。所有结果均收集并记录在表格中。结果 A 组患者的平均年龄为(45.40±3.75)岁,B 组患者的平均年龄为(45.50±4.13)岁。A 组男性占 48.8%(n = 21),女性占 52.9%(n = 9);B 组男性占 51.2%(n = 22),女性占 47.1%(n = 8)。术中平均失血量为 71.60 ± 0.77 毫升(A 组)和 101.76 ± 0.85 毫升(B 组)。A组的平均住院时间为(7.63±0.55)天,B组为(12.80±0.71)天。 结论 在治疗外伤性颈椎轴下脱位方面,前路方法在低失血量、缩短手术时间和缩短住院时间方面优于后路方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信