The Role of Bone Grafting in Corrective Osteotomy of Distal Radius Malunions

Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1787539
Ryan Paul, J. Persitz, Shawn Khan, Michael MacDougall, Andrea Chan
{"title":"The Role of Bone Grafting in Corrective Osteotomy of Distal Radius Malunions","authors":"Ryan Paul, J. Persitz, Shawn Khan, Michael MacDougall, Andrea Chan","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1787539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background It remains unclear whether bone grafting is required during corrective osteotomy of the distal radius. The goal of this systematic review is to determine the union, revision, and complication rates of bone grafting techniques associated with extra-articular corrective osteotomy for dorsally malunited distal radius fractures treated with volar plating.\n Questions Is bone grafting in distal radius corrective osteotomy associated with increased rates of bone union and reduced rates of revision surgery and complications?\n Methods A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases was completed for studies reporting clinical outcomes of extra-articular corrective osteotomy for dorsally malunited distal radius fractures treated with volar plating.\n Results A total of 13 studies, with 14 intervention arms and 236 patients, were included. Bone grafting techniques consisted of autograft (6 studies, n = 93), synthetic bone grafts (2 studies, n = 38), allograft (1 study, n = 14), or no grafting (5 studies, n = 91). The overall union rate was 97%, and the mean time-to-union was 12.0 weeks. Larger corrections of dorsal tilt and ulnar variance were performed in the autograft and allograft groups. Complication and revision rates were highest in the synthetic group, 45 and 26.3% respectively.\n Conclusion Grafting in extra-articular corrective osteotomy for dorsally angulated distal radius malunions treated with volar plating is not associated with an improved union rate in the literature. However, larger corrections were achieved in both the autograft and allograft groups compared to the no-graft and synthetic groups, resulting in similar union rates. Synthetic bone grafting was associated with the highest complication and revision rates. Future comparative prospective trials and proper documentation of whether cortical contact was present or absent are required to assess whether bone grafting warrants consideration in more advanced deformities.\n Level of Evidence IV.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background It remains unclear whether bone grafting is required during corrective osteotomy of the distal radius. The goal of this systematic review is to determine the union, revision, and complication rates of bone grafting techniques associated with extra-articular corrective osteotomy for dorsally malunited distal radius fractures treated with volar plating. Questions Is bone grafting in distal radius corrective osteotomy associated with increased rates of bone union and reduced rates of revision surgery and complications? Methods A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases was completed for studies reporting clinical outcomes of extra-articular corrective osteotomy for dorsally malunited distal radius fractures treated with volar plating. Results A total of 13 studies, with 14 intervention arms and 236 patients, were included. Bone grafting techniques consisted of autograft (6 studies, n = 93), synthetic bone grafts (2 studies, n = 38), allograft (1 study, n = 14), or no grafting (5 studies, n = 91). The overall union rate was 97%, and the mean time-to-union was 12.0 weeks. Larger corrections of dorsal tilt and ulnar variance were performed in the autograft and allograft groups. Complication and revision rates were highest in the synthetic group, 45 and 26.3% respectively. Conclusion Grafting in extra-articular corrective osteotomy for dorsally angulated distal radius malunions treated with volar plating is not associated with an improved union rate in the literature. However, larger corrections were achieved in both the autograft and allograft groups compared to the no-graft and synthetic groups, resulting in similar union rates. Synthetic bone grafting was associated with the highest complication and revision rates. Future comparative prospective trials and proper documentation of whether cortical contact was present or absent are required to assess whether bone grafting warrants consideration in more advanced deformities. Level of Evidence IV.
分享
查看原文
骨移植在桡骨远端畸形矫正截骨术中的作用
背景 目前仍不清楚在桡骨远端矫正截骨术中是否需要植骨。本系统性综述的目的是确定在对桡骨远端背侧畸形骨折进行外固定治疗时,与关节外矫正截骨术相关的植骨技术的骨结合率、翻修率和并发症发生率。问题 在桡骨远端矫正截骨术中进行植骨是否能提高骨结合率、降低翻修手术率和并发症发生率?方法 对 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature 数据库进行了全面检索,以寻找报告了采用伏氏钢板治疗背侧畸形桡骨远端骨折的关节外矫正截骨术临床结果的研究。结果 共纳入 13 项研究,14 个干预臂,236 名患者。植骨技术包括自体植骨(6 项研究,n = 93)、合成植骨(2 项研究,n = 38)、异体植骨(1 项研究,n = 14)或不植骨(5 项研究,n = 91)。总体愈合率为 97%,平均愈合时间为 12.0 周。自体移植物组和异体移植物组的背倾和尺侧变异的矫正幅度较大。合成组的并发症和翻修率最高,分别为45%和26.3%。结论 在对背侧成角的桡骨远端畸形进行的关节外矫正截骨术中进行移植,并不能提高文献中的愈合率。然而,与无移植物组和合成组相比,自体移植物组和异体移植物组都获得了更大的矫正,从而获得了相似的愈合率。合成骨移植的并发症和翻修率最高。未来需要进行比较性前瞻性试验,并适当记录皮质接触是否存在,以评估在更晚期的畸形中是否需要考虑骨移植。证据等级 IV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信