Governmental management of social housing as an element of state social policy: Bibliometric analysis

F. Mammadova, Nargiz Fatahova, Shaban Mammadov, Ruslan Gasimov, Shukur Aliyev
{"title":"Governmental management of social housing as an element of state social policy: Bibliometric analysis","authors":"F. Mammadova, Nargiz Fatahova, Shaban Mammadov, Ruslan Gasimov, Shukur Aliyev","doi":"10.21511/ppm.22(2).2024.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social housing for socially vulnerable segments of the population is a significant component of governmental social policy, as it is directly linked to demographic and migration processes, socially vulnerable groups and people with special needs, poverty alleviation, social integration, and community development. The study conducts a bibliometric analysis (using VOSviewer tools) of the scientific literature on social housing policy and management. The study filtered more than 6,000 research papers indexed in the Scopus database from 1983 to 2024. The purpose was to structure the global scientific knowledge on governmental management of social housing as an element of the state’s social policy, focusing on the following directions. The first is the evolution of scientific thought. The analysis revealed a rapid growth in scientific interest starting from 1991; the earliest articles were published in the United Kingdom, Netherlands, and the United States, while scholars from Spain, Mexico, and Italy joined after 2020. The second is the complexity or conversely – concentration of research networks. The top five countries by the number of works are the United Kingdom, Australia, the Netherlands, Italy, and the United States; the most powerful research schools are in the Netherlands, Australia, and the United Kingdom; the most extensive scientific connections are held by the Netherlands, the United States, the United Kingdom, Italy, and France. The third is the content-thematic orientation of the research. The paper identified the predominance of works from social sciences; social housing issues are most frequently studied in connection with public health and inequality issues.","PeriodicalId":509767,"journal":{"name":"Problems and Perspectives in Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems and Perspectives in Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(2).2024.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social housing for socially vulnerable segments of the population is a significant component of governmental social policy, as it is directly linked to demographic and migration processes, socially vulnerable groups and people with special needs, poverty alleviation, social integration, and community development. The study conducts a bibliometric analysis (using VOSviewer tools) of the scientific literature on social housing policy and management. The study filtered more than 6,000 research papers indexed in the Scopus database from 1983 to 2024. The purpose was to structure the global scientific knowledge on governmental management of social housing as an element of the state’s social policy, focusing on the following directions. The first is the evolution of scientific thought. The analysis revealed a rapid growth in scientific interest starting from 1991; the earliest articles were published in the United Kingdom, Netherlands, and the United States, while scholars from Spain, Mexico, and Italy joined after 2020. The second is the complexity or conversely – concentration of research networks. The top five countries by the number of works are the United Kingdom, Australia, the Netherlands, Italy, and the United States; the most powerful research schools are in the Netherlands, Australia, and the United Kingdom; the most extensive scientific connections are held by the Netherlands, the United States, the United Kingdom, Italy, and France. The third is the content-thematic orientation of the research. The paper identified the predominance of works from social sciences; social housing issues are most frequently studied in connection with public health and inequality issues.
政府对社会住房的管理是国家社会政策的组成部分:文献计量分析
为社会弱势群体提供社会住房是政府社会政策的重要组成部分,因为它与人口和移民进程、社会弱势群体和有特殊需求的人群、减贫、社会融合和社区发展直接相关。本研究对有关社会住房政策和管理的科学文献进行了文献计量分析(使用 VOSviewer 工具)。研究筛选了 Scopus 数据库中索引的 6000 多篇研究论文,时间跨度从 1983 年到 2024 年。研究的目的是构建关于政府管理社会住房这一国家社会政策要素的全球科学知识体系,重点关注以下几个方向。首先是科学思想的演变。分析表明,从 1991 年开始,科学兴趣迅速增长;最早的文章发表在英国、荷兰和美国,而西班牙、墨西哥和意大利的学者则在 2020 年之后加入进来。其次是研究网络的复杂性或反过来说--集中性。著作数量排名前五位的国家分别是英国、澳大利亚、荷兰、意大利和美国;最强大的研究学院在荷兰、澳大利亚和英国;拥有最广泛科学联系的国家分别是荷兰、美国、英国、意大利和法国。第三是研究内容的主题导向。论文指出,社会科学作品占主导地位;社会住房问题最常与公共卫生和不平等问题联系在一起研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信