Improving Subseasonal Soil Moisture and Evaporative Stress Index Forecasts through Machine Learning: The Role of Initial Land State versus Dynamical Model Output
David J. Lorenz, J. Otkin, Ben Zaitchik, C. Hain, T. R. Holmes, M. C. Anderson
{"title":"Improving Subseasonal Soil Moisture and Evaporative Stress Index Forecasts through Machine Learning: The Role of Initial Land State versus Dynamical Model Output","authors":"David J. Lorenz, J. Otkin, Ben Zaitchik, C. Hain, T. R. Holmes, M. C. Anderson","doi":"10.1175/jhm-d-23-0074.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe effect of machine learning and other enhancements on statistical-dynamical forecasts of soil moisture (0-10cm and 0-100cm) and a reference evapotranspiration fraction (Evaporative Stress Index, ESI) on sub-seasonal time scales (15-28 days) are explored. The predictors include the current and past land surface conditions, and dynamical model hindcasts from the Sub-seasonal to Seasonal (S2S) Prediction Project. When the methods are enhanced with machine learning and other improvements, the increases in skill are almost exclusively coming from predictors drawn from observations of current and past land surface states. This suggests that operational S2S flash drought forecasts should focus on optimizing use of information on current conditions rather than on integrating dynamically based forecasts, given the current state of knowledge. Nonlinear machine learning methods lead to improved skill over linear methods for soil moisture but not for ESI. Improvements for both soil moisture and ESI are realized by increasing the sample size by including surrounding grid points in training and increasing the number of predictors. In addition, all the improvements in the soil moisture forecasts predominantly impact soil moistening rather than soil drying—i.e., prediction of conditions moving away from drought rather than into drought—especially when the initial soil state is drier than normal. The physical reasons for the nonlinear machine learning improvements are also explored.","PeriodicalId":503314,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrometeorology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrometeorology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jhm-d-23-0074.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The effect of machine learning and other enhancements on statistical-dynamical forecasts of soil moisture (0-10cm and 0-100cm) and a reference evapotranspiration fraction (Evaporative Stress Index, ESI) on sub-seasonal time scales (15-28 days) are explored. The predictors include the current and past land surface conditions, and dynamical model hindcasts from the Sub-seasonal to Seasonal (S2S) Prediction Project. When the methods are enhanced with machine learning and other improvements, the increases in skill are almost exclusively coming from predictors drawn from observations of current and past land surface states. This suggests that operational S2S flash drought forecasts should focus on optimizing use of information on current conditions rather than on integrating dynamically based forecasts, given the current state of knowledge. Nonlinear machine learning methods lead to improved skill over linear methods for soil moisture but not for ESI. Improvements for both soil moisture and ESI are realized by increasing the sample size by including surrounding grid points in training and increasing the number of predictors. In addition, all the improvements in the soil moisture forecasts predominantly impact soil moistening rather than soil drying—i.e., prediction of conditions moving away from drought rather than into drought—especially when the initial soil state is drier than normal. The physical reasons for the nonlinear machine learning improvements are also explored.
探讨了机器学习和其他改进措施对亚季节时间尺度(15-28 天)上土壤湿度(0-10 厘米和 0-100 厘米)和参考蒸散分数(蒸发压力指数,ESI)的统计-动力预测的影响。预测因子包括当前和过去的地表条件,以及来自亚季节到季节(S2S)预测项目的动态模型后报。当这些方法通过机器学习和其他改进措施得到加强时,其技能的提高几乎完全来自于对当前和过去地表状态观测数据的预测。这表明,在当前知识水平下,S2S 闪电干旱业务预测应侧重于优化当前条件信息的使用,而不是整合基于动态的预测。与线性方法相比,非线性机器学习方法在土壤水分方面的技能有所提高,但在 ESI 方面则不然。通过在训练中加入周围的网格点和增加预测因子的数量来扩大样本量,可以提高土壤湿度和 ESI 的预测能力。此外,土壤水分预测的所有改进主要影响土壤湿润而非土壤干燥,即预测远离干旱而非进入干旱的条件,尤其是当初始土壤状态比正常状态更干燥时。此外,还探讨了非线性机器学习改进的物理原因。