Improving Subseasonal Soil Moisture and Evaporative Stress Index Forecasts through Machine Learning: The Role of Initial Land State versus Dynamical Model Output

David J. Lorenz, J. Otkin, Ben Zaitchik, C. Hain, T. R. Holmes, M. C. Anderson
{"title":"Improving Subseasonal Soil Moisture and Evaporative Stress Index Forecasts through Machine Learning: The Role of Initial Land State versus Dynamical Model Output","authors":"David J. Lorenz, J. Otkin, Ben Zaitchik, C. Hain, T. R. Holmes, M. C. Anderson","doi":"10.1175/jhm-d-23-0074.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe effect of machine learning and other enhancements on statistical-dynamical forecasts of soil moisture (0-10cm and 0-100cm) and a reference evapotranspiration fraction (Evaporative Stress Index, ESI) on sub-seasonal time scales (15-28 days) are explored. The predictors include the current and past land surface conditions, and dynamical model hindcasts from the Sub-seasonal to Seasonal (S2S) Prediction Project. When the methods are enhanced with machine learning and other improvements, the increases in skill are almost exclusively coming from predictors drawn from observations of current and past land surface states. This suggests that operational S2S flash drought forecasts should focus on optimizing use of information on current conditions rather than on integrating dynamically based forecasts, given the current state of knowledge. Nonlinear machine learning methods lead to improved skill over linear methods for soil moisture but not for ESI. Improvements for both soil moisture and ESI are realized by increasing the sample size by including surrounding grid points in training and increasing the number of predictors. In addition, all the improvements in the soil moisture forecasts predominantly impact soil moistening rather than soil drying—i.e., prediction of conditions moving away from drought rather than into drought—especially when the initial soil state is drier than normal. The physical reasons for the nonlinear machine learning improvements are also explored.","PeriodicalId":503314,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrometeorology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrometeorology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jhm-d-23-0074.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effect of machine learning and other enhancements on statistical-dynamical forecasts of soil moisture (0-10cm and 0-100cm) and a reference evapotranspiration fraction (Evaporative Stress Index, ESI) on sub-seasonal time scales (15-28 days) are explored. The predictors include the current and past land surface conditions, and dynamical model hindcasts from the Sub-seasonal to Seasonal (S2S) Prediction Project. When the methods are enhanced with machine learning and other improvements, the increases in skill are almost exclusively coming from predictors drawn from observations of current and past land surface states. This suggests that operational S2S flash drought forecasts should focus on optimizing use of information on current conditions rather than on integrating dynamically based forecasts, given the current state of knowledge. Nonlinear machine learning methods lead to improved skill over linear methods for soil moisture but not for ESI. Improvements for both soil moisture and ESI are realized by increasing the sample size by including surrounding grid points in training and increasing the number of predictors. In addition, all the improvements in the soil moisture forecasts predominantly impact soil moistening rather than soil drying—i.e., prediction of conditions moving away from drought rather than into drought—especially when the initial soil state is drier than normal. The physical reasons for the nonlinear machine learning improvements are also explored.
通过机器学习改进亚季土壤水分和蒸发压力指数预报:初始土地状态与动态模型输出的作用
探讨了机器学习和其他改进措施对亚季节时间尺度(15-28 天)上土壤湿度(0-10 厘米和 0-100 厘米)和参考蒸散分数(蒸发压力指数,ESI)的统计-动力预测的影响。预测因子包括当前和过去的地表条件,以及来自亚季节到季节(S2S)预测项目的动态模型后报。当这些方法通过机器学习和其他改进措施得到加强时,其技能的提高几乎完全来自于对当前和过去地表状态观测数据的预测。这表明,在当前知识水平下,S2S 闪电干旱业务预测应侧重于优化当前条件信息的使用,而不是整合基于动态的预测。与线性方法相比,非线性机器学习方法在土壤水分方面的技能有所提高,但在 ESI 方面则不然。通过在训练中加入周围的网格点和增加预测因子的数量来扩大样本量,可以提高土壤湿度和 ESI 的预测能力。此外,土壤水分预测的所有改进主要影响土壤湿润而非土壤干燥,即预测远离干旱而非进入干旱的条件,尤其是当初始土壤状态比正常状态更干燥时。此外,还探讨了非线性机器学习改进的物理原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信