Restriction Spectrum Imaging as a quantitative biomarker for prostate cancer with reliable positive predictive value

Mariluz Rojo Domingo, D. Do, C. Conlin, Aditya Bagrodia, Tristan Barrett, Madison T Baxter, Matthew Cooperberg, Felix Feng, M. E. Hahn, M. Harisinghani, G. Hollenberg, Juan Javier-Desloges, Karoline Kallis, Sophia Kamran, Christopher J. Kane, Dimitri Kessler, J. Kuperman, Kang-Lung Lee, Jonathan Levine, Michael A. Liss, D. Margolis, Ian Matthews, Paul M Murphy, Nabih Nakrour, Michael Ohliger, C. Ollison, Thomas Osinski, Anthony J. Pamatmat, Isabella R Pompa, R. Rakow-Penner, Jacob L Roberts, Karan Santhosh, A. Shabaik, Yuze Song, David Song, C. M. Tempany, Natasha Wehrli, E. Weinberg, Sean Woolen, George Xu, A. Y. Zhong, Anders M. Dale, Tyler M Seibert
{"title":"Restriction Spectrum Imaging as a quantitative biomarker for prostate cancer with reliable positive predictive value","authors":"Mariluz Rojo Domingo, D. Do, C. Conlin, Aditya Bagrodia, Tristan Barrett, Madison T Baxter, Matthew Cooperberg, Felix Feng, M. E. Hahn, M. Harisinghani, G. Hollenberg, Juan Javier-Desloges, Karoline Kallis, Sophia Kamran, Christopher J. Kane, Dimitri Kessler, J. Kuperman, Kang-Lung Lee, Jonathan Levine, Michael A. Liss, D. Margolis, Ian Matthews, Paul M Murphy, Nabih Nakrour, Michael Ohliger, C. Ollison, Thomas Osinski, Anthony J. Pamatmat, Isabella R Pompa, R. Rakow-Penner, Jacob L Roberts, Karan Santhosh, A. Shabaik, Yuze Song, David Song, C. M. Tempany, Natasha Wehrli, E. Weinberg, Sean Woolen, George Xu, A. Y. Zhong, Anders M. Dale, Tyler M Seibert","doi":"10.1101/2024.06.05.24308468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objective. Positive predictive value of PI-RADS for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa, grade group [GG][≥]2) varies widely between institutions and radiologists. The Restriction Spectrum Imaging restriction score (RSIrs) is a metric derived from diffusion MRI that could be an objectively interpretable biomarker for csPCa. Methods. In patients scanned for suspected or known csPCa at 7 centers, we calculated patient-level csPCa probability based on maximum RSIrs in the prostate, without relying on subjectively defined lesions. We used area under the ROC curve (AUC) to compare patient-level csPCa detection for RSIrs, ADC, and PI-RADS. Finally, we combined RSIrs with clinical risk factors via multivariable regression, training in a single-center cohort and testing in an independent, multi-center dataset. Key Findings and Limitations. Among all patients (n=1892), probability of csPCa increased with higher RSIrs. GG[≥]4 csPCa was most common in patients with very high RSIrs. Among biopsy-naive patients (n=877), AUCs for GG[≥]2 vs. non-csPCa were 0.73 (0.69-0.76), 0.54 (0.50-0.57), and 0.75 (0.71-0.78) for RSIrs, ADC, and PI-RADS, respectively. RSIrs significantly outperformed ADC (p<0.01) and was comparable to PI-RADS (p=0.31). The combination of RSIrs and PI-RADS outperformed either alone. Combining RSIrs with PI-RADS, age, and PSA density in a multivariable model achieved the best discrimination of csPCa. Conclusions and Clinical Implications. RSIrs is an accurate and reliable quantitative biomarker that performs better than conventional ADC and comparably to expert-defined PI-RADS for patient-level detection of csPCa. RSIrs provides objective estimates of probability of csPCa that do not require radiology expertise.","PeriodicalId":506788,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.05.24308468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objective. Positive predictive value of PI-RADS for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa, grade group [GG][≥]2) varies widely between institutions and radiologists. The Restriction Spectrum Imaging restriction score (RSIrs) is a metric derived from diffusion MRI that could be an objectively interpretable biomarker for csPCa. Methods. In patients scanned for suspected or known csPCa at 7 centers, we calculated patient-level csPCa probability based on maximum RSIrs in the prostate, without relying on subjectively defined lesions. We used area under the ROC curve (AUC) to compare patient-level csPCa detection for RSIrs, ADC, and PI-RADS. Finally, we combined RSIrs with clinical risk factors via multivariable regression, training in a single-center cohort and testing in an independent, multi-center dataset. Key Findings and Limitations. Among all patients (n=1892), probability of csPCa increased with higher RSIrs. GG[≥]4 csPCa was most common in patients with very high RSIrs. Among biopsy-naive patients (n=877), AUCs for GG[≥]2 vs. non-csPCa were 0.73 (0.69-0.76), 0.54 (0.50-0.57), and 0.75 (0.71-0.78) for RSIrs, ADC, and PI-RADS, respectively. RSIrs significantly outperformed ADC (p<0.01) and was comparable to PI-RADS (p=0.31). The combination of RSIrs and PI-RADS outperformed either alone. Combining RSIrs with PI-RADS, age, and PSA density in a multivariable model achieved the best discrimination of csPCa. Conclusions and Clinical Implications. RSIrs is an accurate and reliable quantitative biomarker that performs better than conventional ADC and comparably to expert-defined PI-RADS for patient-level detection of csPCa. RSIrs provides objective estimates of probability of csPCa that do not require radiology expertise.
限制性频谱成像作为前列腺癌的定量生物标记物,具有可靠的阳性预测价值
背景和目的。PI-RADS 对有临床意义的前列腺癌(csPCa,分级组 [GG][≥]2)的阳性预测值在不同机构和放射科医生之间存在很大差异。限制频谱成像限制评分(RSIrs)是从弥散核磁共振成像中得出的指标,可作为 csPCa 的客观可解释生物标志物。方法。在 7 个中心对疑似或已知 csPCa 患者进行扫描后,我们根据前列腺中的最大 RSIrs 计算出患者级别的 csPCa 概率,而不依赖于主观定义的病灶。我们使用 ROC 曲线下面积 (AUC) 对 RSIrs、ADC 和 PI-RADS 的患者级 csPCa 检测进行了比较。最后,我们通过多变量回归将 RSIrs 与临床风险因素相结合,在单中心队列中进行训练,并在独立的多中心数据集中进行测试。主要发现和局限性。在所有患者(n=1892)中,发生 csPCa 的概率随着 RSIrs 的升高而升高。GG[≥]4型csPCa在RSI率极高的患者中最为常见。在未经活检的患者(n=877)中,RSIrs、ADC 和 PI-RADS 的 GG[≥]2 与非 csPCa 的 AUC 分别为 0.73(0.69-0.76)、0.54(0.50-0.57)和 0.75(0.71-0.78)。RSIrs 明显优于 ADC(p<0.01),与 PI-RADS 相当(p=0.31)。结合使用 RSIrs 和 PI-RADS 的效果优于单独使用其中一种的效果。在一个多变量模型中,将 RSIrs 与 PI-RADS、年龄和 PSA 密度相结合,可实现对 csPCa 的最佳判别。结论和临床意义。RSIrs 是一种准确可靠的定量生物标记物,在患者水平的 csPCa 检测中,其表现优于传统的 ADC,与专家定义的 PI-RADS 不相上下。RSIrs 可提供客观的 csPCa 概率估计,无需放射学专业知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信