76th Festival D'avignon (review)

IF 0.8 3区 艺术学 0 THEATER
Ljubiša Matić
{"title":"76th Festival D'avignon (review)","authors":"Ljubiša Matić","doi":"10.1353/tj.2024.a929520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>76th Festival D’avignon</em> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Ljubiša Matić </li> </ul> <em>76TH FESTIVAL D’AVIGNON</em>. Palais des Papes and various other venues, Avignon, France. July 7–26, 2022. <p>After the collective trauma that made the live (co-) presence of people in public irrelevant, or even dangerous, the breath of a certain freedom soared afresh along the ramparts of Avignon. The longest-running theatre festival in France was canceled due to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, and then returned in 2021 with strict “social distancing” measures in place, which brought forth an atmosphere of crowd management, surveillance, and insecurity. In July 2022, those restrictions were rescinded, which allowed the Festival to once more pervade the one-half-square-mile within the fortifications of the former City of Popes that houses upward of two hundred performing venues. Given that theatre attendance in France had plummeted by as much as thirty percent compared to pre-COVID times, theatre companies were eager to embrace the Avignon festival as a way to revitalize attendance at live art events.</p> <p>By dehierarchizing and depersonalizing dramatis personae, as well as assembling them as choruses and in chorus-like configurations, several festival productions reflected on the tensions surrounding contemporary collectivism. Specificall, the festival spoke to lingering tensions regarding governmental policies enacted during the pandemic in the name of collective values and public health, which were perceived by some members of the public as examples of latent authoritarianism. As if to suggest ways out of this impasse, the choral formations, as well as the dehierarchization of dramatic character, necessitated performers’ multidisciplinary versatility and volatility, hinting at an artistic ambivalence that elided overt contestations between the state and the individual.</p> <p>After Russian authorities disbanded his Moscow theatre, the popular Gogol Center, Kirill Serebrennikov became the first Russian artist to have the honor of opening the Avignon festivities with a premiere at the Palais des Papes. Although the director had long been considered an opponent of Vladimir Putin’s politics, and since 2021 an antiwar spokesman to boot, he was chosen as the festival’s drawing card long before the February 2022 onset of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. By the same token, his conceptualization of the play <em>The Black Monk</em> (<em>The Чёрный Mönch</em>)—co-produced by the Gogol Center, Hamburg’s Thalia Theater, and, as rumor had it, Russian tycoons who defected to Berlin—predated the war’s outbreak. The mixed critical reception of the show, which had attracted considerable attention from festivalgoers, was due partly to the audience’s inflated expectations as well as to the artistic team’s unfulfilled ambitions.</p> <br/> Click for larger view<br/> View full resolution <p>Heavenly bodies as the archetype of the chorus in <em>The Black Monk</em>. (Photo: Christophe Raynaud de Lage.)</p> <p></p> <p><em>The Black Monk</em> is based on a meditative, intimist novella by Anton Chekhov that explores questions of insanity and delusions of grandeur. Serebrennikov <strong>[End Page 102]</strong> elevated his source text into a Gesamtkunstwerk that felt even more grandiose for having been staged under the imposing walls of the Court of Honor, which seats 2,500 spectators. Four distinct sections of the play allowed the spectators to linger over the perspectives of central characters: an overworked young intellectual Kovrin, who is haunted by hallucinations of a black-robed monk convincing him he is chosen by God for his genius to save mankind from millennia of suffering; his foster father, who offers him refuge at the countryside estate with breathtaking gardens where he grew up; his wife, who is compelled to cajole him into undergoing treatment, after which he regains mental health but loses joy in life and thus starts missing conversations with the monk; and the apparition itself, brought back one last time by Kovrin’s own remorse for ruining his family, in an encounter that leads to his death—with his face frozen in a blissful smile.</p> <br/> Click for larger view<br/> View full resolution <p>“Crammed together into a rectangle in the middle of the stage” in <em>Solitaire</em>. (Photo: Christophe Raynaud de Lage.)</p> <p></p> <p>To develop an aesthetic that would intimidate the spectators by penetrating the mechanisms of madness, the dissident director went beyond intensifying Kovrin’s frenzy and aggressiveness. In the production, which largely adhered to the...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":46247,"journal":{"name":"THEATRE JOURNAL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THEATRE JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tj.2024.a929520","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • 76th Festival D’avignon
  • Ljubiša Matić
76TH FESTIVAL D’AVIGNON. Palais des Papes and various other venues, Avignon, France. July 7–26, 2022.

After the collective trauma that made the live (co-) presence of people in public irrelevant, or even dangerous, the breath of a certain freedom soared afresh along the ramparts of Avignon. The longest-running theatre festival in France was canceled due to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, and then returned in 2021 with strict “social distancing” measures in place, which brought forth an atmosphere of crowd management, surveillance, and insecurity. In July 2022, those restrictions were rescinded, which allowed the Festival to once more pervade the one-half-square-mile within the fortifications of the former City of Popes that houses upward of two hundred performing venues. Given that theatre attendance in France had plummeted by as much as thirty percent compared to pre-COVID times, theatre companies were eager to embrace the Avignon festival as a way to revitalize attendance at live art events.

By dehierarchizing and depersonalizing dramatis personae, as well as assembling them as choruses and in chorus-like configurations, several festival productions reflected on the tensions surrounding contemporary collectivism. Specificall, the festival spoke to lingering tensions regarding governmental policies enacted during the pandemic in the name of collective values and public health, which were perceived by some members of the public as examples of latent authoritarianism. As if to suggest ways out of this impasse, the choral formations, as well as the dehierarchization of dramatic character, necessitated performers’ multidisciplinary versatility and volatility, hinting at an artistic ambivalence that elided overt contestations between the state and the individual.

After Russian authorities disbanded his Moscow theatre, the popular Gogol Center, Kirill Serebrennikov became the first Russian artist to have the honor of opening the Avignon festivities with a premiere at the Palais des Papes. Although the director had long been considered an opponent of Vladimir Putin’s politics, and since 2021 an antiwar spokesman to boot, he was chosen as the festival’s drawing card long before the February 2022 onset of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. By the same token, his conceptualization of the play The Black Monk (The Чёрный Mönch)—co-produced by the Gogol Center, Hamburg’s Thalia Theater, and, as rumor had it, Russian tycoons who defected to Berlin—predated the war’s outbreak. The mixed critical reception of the show, which had attracted considerable attention from festivalgoers, was due partly to the audience’s inflated expectations as well as to the artistic team’s unfulfilled ambitions.


Click for larger view
View full resolution

Heavenly bodies as the archetype of the chorus in The Black Monk. (Photo: Christophe Raynaud de Lage.)

The Black Monk is based on a meditative, intimist novella by Anton Chekhov that explores questions of insanity and delusions of grandeur. Serebrennikov [End Page 102] elevated his source text into a Gesamtkunstwerk that felt even more grandiose for having been staged under the imposing walls of the Court of Honor, which seats 2,500 spectators. Four distinct sections of the play allowed the spectators to linger over the perspectives of central characters: an overworked young intellectual Kovrin, who is haunted by hallucinations of a black-robed monk convincing him he is chosen by God for his genius to save mankind from millennia of suffering; his foster father, who offers him refuge at the countryside estate with breathtaking gardens where he grew up; his wife, who is compelled to cajole him into undergoing treatment, after which he regains mental health but loses joy in life and thus starts missing conversations with the monk; and the apparition itself, brought back one last time by Kovrin’s own remorse for ruining his family, in an encounter that leads to his death—with his face frozen in a blissful smile.


Click for larger view
View full resolution

“Crammed together into a rectangle in the middle of the stage” in Solitaire. (Photo: Christophe Raynaud de Lage.)

To develop an aesthetic that would intimidate the spectators by penetrating the mechanisms of madness, the dissident director went beyond intensifying Kovrin’s frenzy and aggressiveness. In the production, which largely adhered to the...

第 76 届阿维尼翁艺术节(回顾)
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者: 第 76 届阿维尼翁艺术节 Ljubiša Matić 第 76 届阿维尼翁艺术节。法国,阿维尼翁,教皇宫殿及其他多个地点。2022 年 7 月 7 日至 26 日。在经历了让人们在公共场合现场(共同)表演变得无关紧要甚至危险的集体创伤之后,某种自由的气息在阿维尼翁的城墙上重新升腾。这个法国历史最悠久的戏剧节在 2020 年因 COVID-19 大流行而被取消,随后在 2021 年恢复举办,并采取了严格的 "社会隔离 "措施,带来了人群管理、监视和不安全的气氛。2022 年 7 月,这些限制措施被取消,戏剧节得以再次在前教皇之城防御工事内的半平方英里范围内举行,这里有两百多个演出场所。鉴于法国的剧院观众人数与《反对种族主义、种族歧视、仇外心理和相关不容忍行为国际公约》颁布前相比锐减了 30%,剧团急于将阿维尼翁戏剧节作为重振现场艺术活动观众人数的一种方式。通过将戏剧人物去等级化和人格化,以及将他们组合成合唱团或类似合唱团的配置,一些戏剧节作品反映了当代集体主义的紧张关系。具体而言,艺术节讨论了大流行病期间政府以集体价值观和公共卫生的名义制定的政策所引发的挥之不去的紧张关系,一些公众认为这些政策是潜在的专制主义的例子。为了摆脱这种僵局,合唱形式以及戏剧角色的去等级化要求表演者具有多学科的多变性,这也暗示了一种艺术上的矛盾性,它回避了国家与个人之间的公开较量。基里尔-谢列布连尼科夫(Kirill Serebrennikov)的莫斯科剧院--广受欢迎的果戈理中心--被俄罗斯当局解散后,他成为首位有幸在教皇宫殿首演并为阿维尼翁庆典揭幕的俄罗斯艺术家。尽管这位导演长期以来一直被认为是弗拉基米尔-普京(Vladimir Putin)政治的反对者,而且自2021年以来一直是反战发言人,但早在2022年2月俄罗斯入侵乌克兰之前,他就被选为电影节的亮点。同样,他的话剧《黑僧》(The Чёрный Mönch)由果戈理中心(Gogol Center)、汉堡塔利亚剧院(Thalia Theater)联合制作,据传还有投奔柏林的俄罗斯富豪参与演出。该剧受到了艺术节观众的广泛关注,但评论界对该剧的评价却褒贬不一,部分原因是观众的期望值过高,而艺术团队的雄心壮志也未能实现。 点击查看大图 查看完整分辨率 《黑僧》中作为合唱原型的天体。(照片:Christophe Raynaud de Lage。)《黑僧》改编自安东-契诃夫(Anton Chekhov)的长篇小说《黑僧》(The Black Monk)。谢列布连尼科夫 [尾页 102]将原著提升为一部综合艺术作品,在可容纳 2,500 名观众的荣誉法庭的宏伟围墙下上演,让人感觉更加宏伟壮观。该剧有四个不同的章节,让观众可以从不同的角度欣赏剧中的核心人物:劳累过度的年轻知识分子科夫林,他被一个黑袍僧侣的幻觉所困扰,这个僧侣告诉他,他是上帝选中的天才,能够拯救人类脱离千年的苦难;他的养父,在他成长的乡村庄园里为他提供庇护,那里有令人叹为观止的花园;他的妻子在他的劝说下接受了治疗,之后他恢复了精神健康,但却失去了生活的乐趣,因此开始怀念与僧侣的对话;以及幽灵本身,科夫林因自己对毁掉家庭的悔恨而最后一次复活,在一次导致他死亡的遭遇中,他的脸凝固在幸福的微笑中。 点击查看大图 查看完整分辨率 《纸牌》中 "挤在舞台中央的一个长方形里"。(照片:Christophe Raynaud de Lage。)为了发展出一种美学,通过穿透疯狂的机制来震慑观众,这位持不同政见的导演不仅强化了科夫林的狂热和攻击性,而且还在剧中加入了一些新的元素。该剧在很大程度上遵循了......
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
THEATRE JOURNAL
THEATRE JOURNAL THEATER-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
40.00%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: For over five decades, Theatre Journal"s broad array of scholarly articles and reviews has earned it an international reputation as one of the most authoritative and useful publications of theatre studies available today. Drawing contributions from noted practitioners and scholars, Theatre Journal features social and historical studies, production reviews, and theoretical inquiries that analyze dramatic texts and production.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信