Generic protein–ligand interaction scoring by integrating physical prior knowledge and data augmentation modelling

IF 18.8 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Duanhua Cao, Geng Chen, Jiaxin Jiang, Jie Yu, Runze Zhang, Mingan Chen, Wei Zhang, Lifan Chen, Feisheng Zhong, Yingying Zhang, Chenghao Lu, Xutong Li, Xiaomin Luo, Sulin Zhang, Mingyue Zheng
{"title":"Generic protein–ligand interaction scoring by integrating physical prior knowledge and data augmentation modelling","authors":"Duanhua Cao, Geng Chen, Jiaxin Jiang, Jie Yu, Runze Zhang, Mingan Chen, Wei Zhang, Lifan Chen, Feisheng Zhong, Yingying Zhang, Chenghao Lu, Xutong Li, Xiaomin Luo, Sulin Zhang, Mingyue Zheng","doi":"10.1038/s42256-024-00849-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Developing robust methods for evaluating protein–ligand interactions has been a long-standing problem. Data-driven methods may memorize ligand and protein training data rather than learning protein–ligand interactions. Here we show a scoring approach called EquiScore, which utilizes a heterogeneous graph neural network to integrate physical prior knowledge and characterize protein–ligand interactions in equivariant geometric space. EquiScore is trained based on a new dataset constructed with multiple data augmentation strategies and a stringent redundancy-removal scheme. On two large external test sets, EquiScore consistently achieved top-ranking performance compared to 21 other methods. When EquiScore is used alongside different docking methods, it can effectively enhance the screening ability of these docking methods. EquiScore also showed good performance on the activity-ranking task of a series of structural analogues, indicating its potential to guide lead compound optimization. Finally, we investigated different levels of interpretability of EquiScore, which may provide more insights into structure-based drug design. Machine learning can improve scoring methods to evaluate protein–ligand interactions, but achieving good generalization is an outstanding challenge. Cao et al. introduce EquiScore, which is based on a graph neural network that integrates physical knowledge and is shown to have robust capabilities when applied to unseen protein targets.","PeriodicalId":48533,"journal":{"name":"Nature Machine Intelligence","volume":"6 6","pages":"688-700"},"PeriodicalIF":18.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Machine Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s42256-024-00849-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Developing robust methods for evaluating protein–ligand interactions has been a long-standing problem. Data-driven methods may memorize ligand and protein training data rather than learning protein–ligand interactions. Here we show a scoring approach called EquiScore, which utilizes a heterogeneous graph neural network to integrate physical prior knowledge and characterize protein–ligand interactions in equivariant geometric space. EquiScore is trained based on a new dataset constructed with multiple data augmentation strategies and a stringent redundancy-removal scheme. On two large external test sets, EquiScore consistently achieved top-ranking performance compared to 21 other methods. When EquiScore is used alongside different docking methods, it can effectively enhance the screening ability of these docking methods. EquiScore also showed good performance on the activity-ranking task of a series of structural analogues, indicating its potential to guide lead compound optimization. Finally, we investigated different levels of interpretability of EquiScore, which may provide more insights into structure-based drug design. Machine learning can improve scoring methods to evaluate protein–ligand interactions, but achieving good generalization is an outstanding challenge. Cao et al. introduce EquiScore, which is based on a graph neural network that integrates physical knowledge and is shown to have robust capabilities when applied to unseen protein targets.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

通过整合物理先验知识和数据增强建模进行通用蛋白质配体相互作用评分
开发稳健的蛋白质配体相互作用评估方法是一个长期存在的问题。数据驱动的方法可能会记忆配体和蛋白质的训练数据,而不是学习蛋白质配体之间的相互作用。在这里,我们展示了一种名为 EquiScore 的评分方法,它利用异构图神经网络整合物理先验知识,在等变几何空间中描述蛋白质-配体的相互作用。EquiScore 基于一个新的数据集进行训练,该数据集采用了多种数据增强策略和严格的冗余去除方案。在两个大型外部测试集上,与其他 21 种方法相比,EquiScore 的性能始终名列前茅。当 EquiScore 与不同的对接方法一起使用时,它能有效地提高这些对接方法的筛选能力。EquiScore 还在一系列结构类似物的活性排名任务中表现出良好的性能,这表明它具有指导先导化合物优化的潜力。最后,我们研究了 EquiScore 不同层次的可解释性,这可能会为基于结构的药物设计提供更多启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
36.90
自引率
2.10%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Nature Machine Intelligence is a distinguished publication that presents original research and reviews on various topics in machine learning, robotics, and AI. Our focus extends beyond these fields, exploring their profound impact on other scientific disciplines, as well as societal and industrial aspects. We recognize limitless possibilities wherein machine intelligence can augment human capabilities and knowledge in domains like scientific exploration, healthcare, medical diagnostics, and the creation of safe and sustainable cities, transportation, and agriculture. Simultaneously, we acknowledge the emergence of ethical, social, and legal concerns due to the rapid pace of advancements. To foster interdisciplinary discussions on these far-reaching implications, Nature Machine Intelligence serves as a platform for dialogue facilitated through Comments, News Features, News & Views articles, and Correspondence. Our goal is to encourage a comprehensive examination of these subjects. Similar to all Nature-branded journals, Nature Machine Intelligence operates under the guidance of a team of skilled editors. We adhere to a fair and rigorous peer-review process, ensuring high standards of copy-editing and production, swift publication, and editorial independence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信