Retrieval Practice Improves Exam Performance as a Function of Review Question Number and Format.

Journal, physical therapy education Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-04 DOI:10.1097/JTE.0000000000000352
Jason Pitt, Bethany Huebner
{"title":"Retrieval Practice Improves Exam Performance as a Function of Review Question Number and Format.","authors":"Jason Pitt, Bethany Huebner","doi":"10.1097/JTE.0000000000000352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although retrieval practice is a well-established method of improving learning, it is unclear whether review question format matters or how many review questions are needed to maximize the effects of retrieval practice.</p><p><strong>Review of literature: </strong>Inconsistent findings are reported regarding review question format, and no studies were conducted in physical therapy education programs. A positive relationship is reported between review question number and exam performance, but no studies estimate the number of review questions needed to maximize retention of specific learning objectives.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Eighty-eight second-year Doctor of Physical Therapy students (baseline cohort = 42 students, intervention cohort = 46 students).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Exam questions were randomly assigned into different review categories. Some exam questions received no review, whereas other exam questions were reviewed with open-ended review questions or varying numbers of multiple-choice review questions. Performance on 160 multiple-choice exam questions was compared between review question categories using mixed-effects logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both open-ended and multiple-choice review questions significantly improved exam question performance. Performance on exam questions improved most when more than one multiple-choice review question was provided. After controlling for exam question difficulty, multiple-choice review questions were superior to open-ended review questions.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>On multiple-choice exams, multiple-choice review questions are at least as effective as open-ended review questions. Given their ease of implementation, multiple-choice review questions are an efficient means to improve multiple-choice exam question performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":517432,"journal":{"name":"Journal, physical therapy education","volume":" ","pages":"33-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal, physical therapy education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTE.0000000000000352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Although retrieval practice is a well-established method of improving learning, it is unclear whether review question format matters or how many review questions are needed to maximize the effects of retrieval practice.

Review of literature: Inconsistent findings are reported regarding review question format, and no studies were conducted in physical therapy education programs. A positive relationship is reported between review question number and exam performance, but no studies estimate the number of review questions needed to maximize retention of specific learning objectives.

Subjects: Eighty-eight second-year Doctor of Physical Therapy students (baseline cohort = 42 students, intervention cohort = 46 students).

Methods: Exam questions were randomly assigned into different review categories. Some exam questions received no review, whereas other exam questions were reviewed with open-ended review questions or varying numbers of multiple-choice review questions. Performance on 160 multiple-choice exam questions was compared between review question categories using mixed-effects logistic regression models.

Results: Both open-ended and multiple-choice review questions significantly improved exam question performance. Performance on exam questions improved most when more than one multiple-choice review question was provided. After controlling for exam question difficulty, multiple-choice review questions were superior to open-ended review questions.

Discussion and conclusion: On multiple-choice exams, multiple-choice review questions are at least as effective as open-ended review questions. Given their ease of implementation, multiple-choice review questions are an efficient means to improve multiple-choice exam question performance.

检索练习提高考试成绩与复习题数量和格式有关。
导言:虽然检索练习是一种行之有效的提高学习效果的方法,但目前还不清楚复习题的格式是否重要,也不清楚需要多少复习题才能最大限度地提高检索练习的效果:关于复习题格式的研究结果不一致,也没有在物理治疗教育项目中进行研究。据报道,复习题的数量与考试成绩之间存在正相关关系,但没有研究估计需要多少复习题才能最大限度地保留特定的学习目标:88名物理治疗学博士二年级学生(基线组=42人,干预组=46人):方法:将考试题随机分配到不同的复习类别中。部分试题不进行复习,其他试题则通过开放式复习题或不同数量的多项选择复习题进行复习。使用混合效应逻辑回归模型比较了不同复习题类别的 160 道选择题的成绩:结果:开放式复习题和多项选择复习题都能明显提高考试成绩。当提供一个以上的多项选择复习题时,考试成绩提高最大。在控制了试题难度之后,多项选择复习题优于开放式复习题:在多项选择考试中,多项选择复习题至少与开放式复习题一样有效。鉴于其易于实施,多项选择复习题是提高多项选择考试成绩的有效手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信