[Barriers perceived by advance care planning (ACP) facilitators in nursing and welfare professions in implementing ACP: An online survey].

Q4 Medicine
Kenjiro Kawaguchi, Ryunosuke Shioya, Katsunori Kondo
{"title":"[Barriers perceived by advance care planning (ACP) facilitators in nursing and welfare professions in implementing ACP: An online survey].","authors":"Kenjiro Kawaguchi, Ryunosuke Shioya, Katsunori Kondo","doi":"10.3143/geriatrics.61.228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to elucidate the barriers perceived by Advance Care Planning (ACP) facilitators in nursing and welfare professions when implementing ACP in practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey using Google Forms was conducted between December 2021 and January 2022. The survey targeted 220 individuals, including 82 who completed the Hiroshima Prefecture ACP Promotion Training in 2020 and 138 ACP Promotion Collaborators in Fukuyama City, Hiroshima Prefecture. In addition to the respondents' attributes, the survey asked about the importance of 37 items related to barriers to ACP implementation, using a 7-point scale. We compared two groups: nurses and physicians (\"nurses/physicians\") and other medical and nursing care professionals (\"nursing care professionals, etc.\").</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses were obtained from 67 participants (response rate: 34.4%). The barriers to ACP perceived by nursing care professionals were as follows: 1) lack of knowledge about ACP, 2) belief that other professions are more suitable for implementing ACP than themselves, and 3) difficulty in realizing intentions due to institutional and environmental factors. Nurses and physicians perceived lack of time as an important barrier. Measures such as 1) clarifying how different professions should be involved in ACP, 2) expanding educational opportunities tailored to each profession, 3) utilizing tools to support the decision-making process in ACP, and 4) establishing an information-sharing system infrastructure are considered to be effective in promoting the implementation of ACP by facilitators in the nursing and welfare professions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By implementing measures to address the barriers identified in this study, it is expected that the practice of ACP by facilitators in nursing and welfare professions will be promoted, and ACP will become more widespread in the community.</p>","PeriodicalId":35593,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Geriatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3143/geriatrics.61.228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to elucidate the barriers perceived by Advance Care Planning (ACP) facilitators in nursing and welfare professions when implementing ACP in practice.

Methods: An online survey using Google Forms was conducted between December 2021 and January 2022. The survey targeted 220 individuals, including 82 who completed the Hiroshima Prefecture ACP Promotion Training in 2020 and 138 ACP Promotion Collaborators in Fukuyama City, Hiroshima Prefecture. In addition to the respondents' attributes, the survey asked about the importance of 37 items related to barriers to ACP implementation, using a 7-point scale. We compared two groups: nurses and physicians ("nurses/physicians") and other medical and nursing care professionals ("nursing care professionals, etc.").

Results: Responses were obtained from 67 participants (response rate: 34.4%). The barriers to ACP perceived by nursing care professionals were as follows: 1) lack of knowledge about ACP, 2) belief that other professions are more suitable for implementing ACP than themselves, and 3) difficulty in realizing intentions due to institutional and environmental factors. Nurses and physicians perceived lack of time as an important barrier. Measures such as 1) clarifying how different professions should be involved in ACP, 2) expanding educational opportunities tailored to each profession, 3) utilizing tools to support the decision-making process in ACP, and 4) establishing an information-sharing system infrastructure are considered to be effective in promoting the implementation of ACP by facilitators in the nursing and welfare professions.

Conclusions: By implementing measures to address the barriers identified in this study, it is expected that the practice of ACP by facilitators in nursing and welfare professions will be promoted, and ACP will become more widespread in the community.

[护理和福利专业的预先护理计划(ACP)促进者在实施 ACP 过程中感知到的障碍:在线调查]。
目的:本研究旨在阐明护理和福利专业的预先护理规划(ACP)促进者在实践中实施 ACP 时遇到的障碍:在 2021 年 12 月至 2022 年 1 月期间,使用谷歌表格进行了在线调查。调查对象为 220 人,包括 82 名在 2020 年完成广岛县 ACP 促进培训的人员和 138 名广岛县福山市的 ACP 促进合作者。除了受访者的属性外,调查还采用 7 级量表询问了与 ACP 实施障碍相关的 37 个项目的重要性。我们对两组人进行了比较:护士和医生("护士/医生")以及其他医疗和护理专业人员("护理专业人员等"):结果:67 位参与者做出了回答(回答率:34.4%)。护理专业人员认为 ACP 面临的障碍如下:1) 缺乏对 ACP 的了解;2) 认为其他专业比自己更适合实施 ACP;3) 由于机构和环境因素,难以实现意图。护士和医生认为缺乏时间是一个重要障碍。以下措施被认为能有效促进护理和福利专业的促进者实施 ACP:1)明确不同专业应如何参与 ACP;2)扩大针对各专业的教育机会;3)利用工具支持 ACP 的决策过程;4)建立信息共享系统基础设施:通过采取措施解决本研究中发现的障碍,有望促进护理和福利专业促进者实施 ACP,并使 ACP 在社区中更加普及。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Japanese Journal of Geriatrics
Japanese Journal of Geriatrics Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信