Patient perspectives of general practice consultation for musculoskeletal disorders: A qualitative study.

IF 1.5 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Rachel Thomas, Alice Berry, Fiona Cramp, Nicola Walsh
{"title":"Patient perspectives of general practice consultation for musculoskeletal disorders: A qualitative study.","authors":"Rachel Thomas, Alice Berry, Fiona Cramp, Nicola Walsh","doi":"10.1002/msc.1904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Musculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs) are a significant reason for general practice consultations in the United Kingdom. Current models of care include consultation with a General Practitioner (GP) or a First Contact Physiotherapy Practitioner (FCPP). Evidence suggests that FCPP led care is safe, yet it is unknown whether patients share this belief.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore patients' perspectives of general practice consultation for MSKDs, including views on safety, satisfaction and recommendations for future practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A secondary data analysis utilising qualitative data from the Patient Reported Experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care (PREOS-PC) questionnaire completed by 426 general practice patients who consulted with a MSKD between December 2019 and October 2022. Responses to the question 'What changes, if any, would you suggest to your GP surgery to make sure that health care is provided safely?' were analysed using content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>606 responses across three timepoints were analysed. Two themes and six subthemes were identified; views on safety and satisfaction (inherent trust in the system, provision of face-to-face appointments, prompt access to care, person-centred care) and recommendations for future practice (appointment system: prompt access to face-to-face appointments, delivery of care: co-ordinated and collaborative person-centred care).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients commented that FCPP consultations provided quick and accurate diagnoses and targeted advice. Recommendations for future practice included prompt access to face-to-face appointments, phone calls to be answered more quickly, improved communication for test results and follow ups, patients to feel listened to with a more individualised approach, and better continuity of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":46945,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Care","volume":"22 2","pages":"e1904"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.1904","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs) are a significant reason for general practice consultations in the United Kingdom. Current models of care include consultation with a General Practitioner (GP) or a First Contact Physiotherapy Practitioner (FCPP). Evidence suggests that FCPP led care is safe, yet it is unknown whether patients share this belief.

Purpose: To explore patients' perspectives of general practice consultation for MSKDs, including views on safety, satisfaction and recommendations for future practice.

Methods: A secondary data analysis utilising qualitative data from the Patient Reported Experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care (PREOS-PC) questionnaire completed by 426 general practice patients who consulted with a MSKD between December 2019 and October 2022. Responses to the question 'What changes, if any, would you suggest to your GP surgery to make sure that health care is provided safely?' were analysed using content analysis.

Results: 606 responses across three timepoints were analysed. Two themes and six subthemes were identified; views on safety and satisfaction (inherent trust in the system, provision of face-to-face appointments, prompt access to care, person-centred care) and recommendations for future practice (appointment system: prompt access to face-to-face appointments, delivery of care: co-ordinated and collaborative person-centred care).

Conclusions: Patients commented that FCPP consultations provided quick and accurate diagnoses and targeted advice. Recommendations for future practice included prompt access to face-to-face appointments, phone calls to be answered more quickly, improved communication for test results and follow ups, patients to feel listened to with a more individualised approach, and better continuity of care.

患者对肌肉骨骼疾病全科咨询的看法:定性研究。
背景:在英国,肌肉骨骼疾病(MSKD)是全科医生会诊的一个重要原因。目前的护理模式包括向全科医生(GP)或首诊物理治疗师(FCPP)咨询。有证据表明,FCPP 主导的护理是安全的,但患者是否认同这一观点尚不得而知。目的:探讨患者对 MSKDs 全科咨询的看法,包括对安全性、满意度的看法以及对未来实践的建议:在2019年12月至2022年10月期间,426名全科患者咨询了MSKD,利用患者报告的基层医疗安全经历和结果(PREOS-PC)问卷中的定性数据进行了二次数据分析。我们采用内容分析法对 "为确保医疗服务的安全,您建议您的全科医生诊所做出哪些改变?对三个时间点的 606 份回复进行了分析。确定了两个主题和六个次主题:对安全性和满意度的看法(对系统的固有信任、提供面对面的预约、迅速获得医疗服务、以人为本的医疗服务)以及对未来实践的建议(预约系统:迅速获得面对面的预约、提供医疗服务:协调合作的以人为本的医疗服务):患者认为 FCPP 咨询提供了快速准确的诊断和有针对性的建议。对未来实践的建议包括:及时进行面对面的预约、更快地接听电话、改善有关检查结果和随访的沟通、让患者感觉到以更加个性化的方式倾听他们的意见,以及改善护理的连续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Musculoskeletal Care
Musculoskeletal Care RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Care is a peer-reviewed journal for all health professionals committed to the clinical delivery of high quality care for people with musculoskeletal conditions and providing knowledge to support decision making by professionals, patients and policy makers. This journal publishes papers on original research, applied research, review articles and clinical guidelines. Regular topics include patient education, psychological and social impact, patient experiences of health care, clinical up dates and the effectiveness of therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信