Comprehensive Audiologic Analyses After Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy.

IF 28.4 1区 医学 Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Victoria A Sanchez, Paul C Dinh, Patrick O Monahan, Sandra Althouse, Jennessa Rooker, Howard D Sesso, M Eileen Dolan, Mandy Weinzerl, Darren R Feldman, Chunkit Fung, Lawrence H Einhorn, Robert D Frisina, Lois B Travis
{"title":"Comprehensive Audiologic Analyses After Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy.","authors":"Victoria A Sanchez, Paul C Dinh, Patrick O Monahan, Sandra Althouse, Jennessa Rooker, Howard D Sesso, M Eileen Dolan, Mandy Weinzerl, Darren R Feldman, Chunkit Fung, Lawrence H Einhorn, Robert D Frisina, Lois B Travis","doi":"10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.1233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Cisplatin is highly ototoxic but widely used. Evidence is lacking regarding cisplatin-related hearing loss (CRHL) in adult-onset cancer survivors with comprehensive audiologic assessments (eg, Words-in-Noise [WIN] tests, full-spectrum audiometry, and additional otologic measures), as well as the progression of CRHL considering comorbidities, modifiable factors associated with risk, and cumulative cisplatin dose.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess CRHL with comprehensive audiologic assessments, including the WIN, evaluate the longitudinal progression of CRHL, and identify factors associated with risk.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>The Platinum Study is a longitudinal study of cisplatin-treated testicular cancer survivors (TCS) enrolled from 2012 to 2018 with follow-up ongoing. Longitudinal comprehensive audiologic assessments at Indiana University and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center included 100 participants without audiometrically defined profound hearing loss (HL) at baseline and at least 3.5 years from their first audiologic assessment. Data were analyzed from December 2013 to December 2022.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Factors associated with risk included cumulative cisplatin dose, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, tobacco use, physical inactivity, body mass index, family history of HL, cognitive dysfunction, psychosocial symptoms, and tinnitus.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Main outcomes were audiometrically measured HL defined as combined-ears high-frequency pure-tone average (4-12 kHz) and speech-recognition in noise performance measured with WIN. Multivariable analyses evaluated factors associated with risk for WIN scores and progression of audiometrically defined HL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median (range) age of 100 participants at evaluation was 48 (25-67) years; median (range) time since chemotherapy: 14 (4-31) years. At follow-up, 78 (78%) TCS had audiometrically defined HL; those self-reporting HL had 2-fold worse hearing than TCS without self-reported HL (48 vs 24 dB HL; P < .001). A total of 54 (54%) patients with self-reported HL showed clinically significant functional impairment on WIN testing. Poorer WIN performance was associated with hypercholesterolemia (β = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.08 to 1.69; P = .03), lower-education (F1 = 5.95; P = .004), and severity of audiometrically defined HL (β̂ = 0.07; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.09; P < .001). CRHL progression was associated with hypercholesterolemia (β̂ = -4.38; 95% CI, -7.42 to -1.34; P = .01) and increasing age (β̂ = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.50; P < .001). Importantly, relative to age-matched male normative data, audiometrically defined CRHL progression significantly interacted with cumulative cisplatin dose (F1 = 5.98; P = .02); patients given 300 mg/m2 or less experienced significantly less progression, whereas greater temporal progression followed doses greater than 300 mg/m2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Follow-up of cisplatin-treated cancer survivors should include strict hypercholesterolemia control and regular audiological assessments. Risk stratification through validated instruments should include querying hearing concerns. CRHL progression relative to age-matched norms is likely associated with cumulative cisplatin dose; investigation over longer follow-up is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":48661,"journal":{"name":"Jama Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":28.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11157440/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jama Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.1233","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Cisplatin is highly ototoxic but widely used. Evidence is lacking regarding cisplatin-related hearing loss (CRHL) in adult-onset cancer survivors with comprehensive audiologic assessments (eg, Words-in-Noise [WIN] tests, full-spectrum audiometry, and additional otologic measures), as well as the progression of CRHL considering comorbidities, modifiable factors associated with risk, and cumulative cisplatin dose.

Objective: To assess CRHL with comprehensive audiologic assessments, including the WIN, evaluate the longitudinal progression of CRHL, and identify factors associated with risk.

Design, setting, and participants: The Platinum Study is a longitudinal study of cisplatin-treated testicular cancer survivors (TCS) enrolled from 2012 to 2018 with follow-up ongoing. Longitudinal comprehensive audiologic assessments at Indiana University and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center included 100 participants without audiometrically defined profound hearing loss (HL) at baseline and at least 3.5 years from their first audiologic assessment. Data were analyzed from December 2013 to December 2022.

Exposures: Factors associated with risk included cumulative cisplatin dose, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, tobacco use, physical inactivity, body mass index, family history of HL, cognitive dysfunction, psychosocial symptoms, and tinnitus.

Main outcomes and measures: Main outcomes were audiometrically measured HL defined as combined-ears high-frequency pure-tone average (4-12 kHz) and speech-recognition in noise performance measured with WIN. Multivariable analyses evaluated factors associated with risk for WIN scores and progression of audiometrically defined HL.

Results: Median (range) age of 100 participants at evaluation was 48 (25-67) years; median (range) time since chemotherapy: 14 (4-31) years. At follow-up, 78 (78%) TCS had audiometrically defined HL; those self-reporting HL had 2-fold worse hearing than TCS without self-reported HL (48 vs 24 dB HL; P < .001). A total of 54 (54%) patients with self-reported HL showed clinically significant functional impairment on WIN testing. Poorer WIN performance was associated with hypercholesterolemia (β = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.08 to 1.69; P = .03), lower-education (F1 = 5.95; P = .004), and severity of audiometrically defined HL (β̂ = 0.07; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.09; P < .001). CRHL progression was associated with hypercholesterolemia (β̂ = -4.38; 95% CI, -7.42 to -1.34; P = .01) and increasing age (β̂ = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.50; P < .001). Importantly, relative to age-matched male normative data, audiometrically defined CRHL progression significantly interacted with cumulative cisplatin dose (F1 = 5.98; P = .02); patients given 300 mg/m2 or less experienced significantly less progression, whereas greater temporal progression followed doses greater than 300 mg/m2.

Conclusions and relevance: Follow-up of cisplatin-treated cancer survivors should include strict hypercholesterolemia control and regular audiological assessments. Risk stratification through validated instruments should include querying hearing concerns. CRHL progression relative to age-matched norms is likely associated with cumulative cisplatin dose; investigation over longer follow-up is warranted.

顺铂化疗后的综合听力分析
重要性顺铂具有高度耳毒性,但被广泛使用。关于成年癌症幸存者顺铂相关听力损失(CRHL)的全面听力评估(如噪声词[WIN]测试、全频谱测听和其他耳科测量方法),以及考虑到合并症、与风险相关的可调节因素和累积顺铂剂量的CRHL进展情况,目前还缺乏相关证据:通过全面的听力学评估(包括 WIN)来评估 CRHL,评估 CRHL 的纵向发展,并确定与风险相关的因素:白金研究是一项纵向研究,研究对象为 2012 年至 2018 年期间入组的顺铂治疗睾丸癌幸存者(TCS),随访仍在进行中。印第安纳大学和纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心进行了纵向综合听力评估,其中包括100名基线时没有听力测定定义的深度听力损失(HL),且距离首次听力评估至少3.5年的参与者。数据分析时间为 2013 年 12 月至 2022 年 12 月:与风险相关的因素包括顺铂累积剂量、高血压、高胆固醇血症、糖尿病、吸烟、缺乏运动、体重指数、HL家族史、认知功能障碍、心理社会症状和耳鸣:主要结果为听力测量的 HL(定义为合并耳高频纯音平均值(4-12 kHz))和用 WIN 测量的噪声中的语音识别能力。多变量分析评估了与 WIN 评分风险和听力学定义的 HL 进展相关的因素:100 名参与者接受评估时的年龄中位数(范围)为 48(25-67)岁;化疗后的时间中位数(范围)为 14(4-31)年。随访时,78 名(78%)TCS 患有听力测定定义的 HL;自述有 HL 的 TCS 的听力比未自述有 HL 的 TCS 差 2 倍(48 vs 24 dB HL;P 结论和相关性:对接受过顺铂治疗的癌症幸存者进行随访时,应严格控制高胆固醇血症并定期进行听力评估。通过有效工具进行风险分层应包括询问听力问题。与年龄匹配的标准值相比,CRHL的进展可能与顺铂的累积剂量有关;需要进行更长时间的随访调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Jama Oncology
Jama Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
37.50
自引率
1.80%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: At JAMA Oncology, our primary goal is to contribute to the advancement of oncology research and enhance patient care. As a leading journal in the field, we strive to publish influential original research, opinions, and reviews that push the boundaries of oncology science. Our mission is to serve as the definitive resource for scientists, clinicians, and trainees in oncology globally. Through our innovative and timely scientific and educational content, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of cancer pathogenesis and the latest treatment advancements to our readers. We are dedicated to effectively disseminating the findings of significant clinical research, major scientific breakthroughs, actionable discoveries, and state-of-the-art treatment pathways to the oncology community. Our ultimate objective is to facilitate the translation of new knowledge into tangible clinical benefits for individuals living with and surviving cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信