Safety and efficacy of new generation azole antifungals in the management of recalcitrant superficial fungal infections and onychomycosis.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Aditya K Gupta, Mesbah Talukder, Avner Shemer, Eran Galili
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of new generation azole antifungals in the management of recalcitrant superficial fungal infections and onychomycosis.","authors":"Aditya K Gupta, Mesbah Talukder, Avner Shemer, Eran Galili","doi":"10.1080/14787210.2024.2362911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Terbinafine is considered the gold standard for treating skin fungal infections and onychomycosis. However, recent reports suggest that dermatophytes are developing resistance to terbinafine and the other traditional antifungal agents, itraconazole and fluconazole. When there is resistance to terbinafine, itraconazole or fluconazole, or when these agents cannot used, for example, due to potential drug interactions with the patient's current medications, clinicians may need to consider off-label use of new generation azoles, such as voriconazole, posaconazole, fosravuconazole, or oteseconazole. It is essential to emphasize that we do not advocate the use of newer generation azoles unless traditional agents such as terbinafine, itraconazole, or fluconazole have been thoroughly evaluated as first-line therapies.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This article reviews the clinical evidence, safety, dosage regimens, pharmacokinetics, and management algorithm of new-generation azole antifungals.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Antifungal stewardship should be the top priority when prescribing new-generation azoles. First-line antifungal therapy is terbinafine and itraconazole. Fluconazole is a consideration but is generally less effective and its use may be off-label in many countries. For difficult-to-treat skin fungal infections and onychomycosis, that have failed terbinafine, itraconazole and fluconazole, we propose consideration of off-label voriconazole or posaconazole.</p>","PeriodicalId":12213,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"399-412"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14787210.2024.2362911","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Terbinafine is considered the gold standard for treating skin fungal infections and onychomycosis. However, recent reports suggest that dermatophytes are developing resistance to terbinafine and the other traditional antifungal agents, itraconazole and fluconazole. When there is resistance to terbinafine, itraconazole or fluconazole, or when these agents cannot used, for example, due to potential drug interactions with the patient's current medications, clinicians may need to consider off-label use of new generation azoles, such as voriconazole, posaconazole, fosravuconazole, or oteseconazole. It is essential to emphasize that we do not advocate the use of newer generation azoles unless traditional agents such as terbinafine, itraconazole, or fluconazole have been thoroughly evaluated as first-line therapies.

Areas covered: This article reviews the clinical evidence, safety, dosage regimens, pharmacokinetics, and management algorithm of new-generation azole antifungals.

Expert opinion: Antifungal stewardship should be the top priority when prescribing new-generation azoles. First-line antifungal therapy is terbinafine and itraconazole. Fluconazole is a consideration but is generally less effective and its use may be off-label in many countries. For difficult-to-treat skin fungal infections and onychomycosis, that have failed terbinafine, itraconazole and fluconazole, we propose consideration of off-label voriconazole or posaconazole.

新一代唑类抗真菌药治疗顽固性浅部真菌感染和甲癣的安全性和有效性。
简介特比萘芬被认为是治疗皮肤真菌感染和甲癣的金标准。然而,最近的报告显示,皮癣菌正在对特比萘芬和其他传统抗真菌药物(伊曲康唑和氟康唑)产生抗药性。如果对特比萘芬、伊曲康唑或氟康唑产生抗药性,或者由于这些药物可能与患者目前服用的药物发生相互作用等原因而无法使用,临床医生可能需要考虑在标签外使用新一代唑类药物,如伏立康唑、泊沙康唑、福斯拉康唑或奥替康唑。必须强调的是,我们不主张使用新一代唑类药物,除非特比萘芬、伊曲康唑或氟康唑等传统药物已被彻底评估为一线疗法:本文回顾了新一代唑类抗真菌药物的临床证据、安全性、剂量方案、药代动力学和管理算法:专家观点:在处方新一代唑类抗真菌药物时,抗真菌管理应是重中之重。特比萘芬和伊曲康唑是一线抗真菌治疗药物。氟康唑也在考虑之列,但其疗效通常较差,而且在许多国家,氟康唑的使用可能不在标签范围内。对于特比萘芬、伊曲康唑和氟康唑治疗无效的难治性皮肤真菌感染和甲真菌病,我们建议考虑标签外使用伏立康唑或泊沙康唑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy (ISSN 1478-7210) provides expert reviews on therapeutics and diagnostics in the treatment of infectious disease. Coverage includes antibiotics, drug resistance, drug therapy, infectious disease medicine, antibacterial, antimicrobial, antifungal and antiviral approaches, and diagnostic tests.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信