Perception and willingness to participate in warehouse receipt system: insights from cashew farmers in the Bono region of Ghana

IF 1.9 Q2 ECONOMICS
Jeffery Kofi Asare, Nicholas Oppong Mensah, Priscilla Agyemang, Anderson Matthew, Surjeet Singh Dhaka
{"title":"Perception and willingness to participate in warehouse receipt system: insights from cashew farmers in the Bono region of Ghana","authors":"Jeffery Kofi Asare, Nicholas Oppong Mensah, Priscilla Agyemang, Anderson Matthew, Surjeet Singh Dhaka","doi":"10.1108/ijse-12-2023-0946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The warehouse receipt system (WRS) is critical for farmers because it addresses agricultural market inefficiencies, provides credit access, reduces postharvest losses and increases access to profitable markets. However, its use and implementation across the commodity value chain remain relatively limited in Sub-Saharan Africa, particularly among cash crop producers. This study examines cashew farmers' perceptions of WRS implementation and determinants of farmer participation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>A total of 153 cashew farmers from the Bono region of Ghana were sampled using a multistage sampling approach. Perception index analysis and Cragg's double hurdle model were used for the analysis.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results revealed that farmers strongly perceived that WRS augmented credit and market access. In addition, farm size, household size, annual income, perception of collateral and higher selling price determined farmers' willingness to participate in WRS.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>Despite the existence of other cashew farmers in Ghana, the study was limited to cashew farmers in Bono Region.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Despite the plethora of benefits of WRS, it is surprising that its implementation in the cashew subsector is geographically limited to East Africa. Thus, this study is the first to provide empirical evidence on the perception of WRS implementation and further examine farmers' willingness to participate in WRS in Ghana.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Peer review</h3>\n<p>The peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/IJSE-12-2023-0946.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47714,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ECONOMICS","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ECONOMICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijse-12-2023-0946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The warehouse receipt system (WRS) is critical for farmers because it addresses agricultural market inefficiencies, provides credit access, reduces postharvest losses and increases access to profitable markets. However, its use and implementation across the commodity value chain remain relatively limited in Sub-Saharan Africa, particularly among cash crop producers. This study examines cashew farmers' perceptions of WRS implementation and determinants of farmer participation.

Design/methodology/approach

A total of 153 cashew farmers from the Bono region of Ghana were sampled using a multistage sampling approach. Perception index analysis and Cragg's double hurdle model were used for the analysis.

Findings

The results revealed that farmers strongly perceived that WRS augmented credit and market access. In addition, farm size, household size, annual income, perception of collateral and higher selling price determined farmers' willingness to participate in WRS.

Research limitations/implications

Despite the existence of other cashew farmers in Ghana, the study was limited to cashew farmers in Bono Region.

Originality/value

Despite the plethora of benefits of WRS, it is surprising that its implementation in the cashew subsector is geographically limited to East Africa. Thus, this study is the first to provide empirical evidence on the perception of WRS implementation and further examine farmers' willingness to participate in WRS in Ghana.

Peer review

The peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/IJSE-12-2023-0946.

参与仓单系统的看法和意愿:加纳博诺地区腰果种植农的见解
目的 仓单系统(WRS)对农民至关重要,因为它可以解决农产品市场效率低下的问题,提供信贷渠道,减少收获后的损失,并增加进入有利可图的市场的机会。然而,在撒哈拉以南非洲地区,尤其是在经济作物生产者中,该系统在整个商品价值链中的使用和实施仍然相对有限。本研究探讨了腰果种植户对 WRS 实施的看法以及种植户参与的决定因素。结果表明,农民强烈认为腰果销售系统增加了信贷和市场准入。此外,农场规模、家庭规模、年收入、对抵押品的认知以及较高的销售价格也决定了农民参与 WRS 的意愿。研究局限性/影响尽管加纳还有其他腰果种植农,但本研究仅限于博诺地区的腰果种植农。因此,本研究首次提供了有关 WRS 实施情况的实证证据,并进一步考察了加纳农民参与 WRS 的意愿。同行评议本文的同行评议记录可在以下网址查阅:https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/IJSE-12-2023-0946。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
98
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Social Economics publishes original and peer-reviewed theoretical and empirical research in the field of social economics. Its focus is on the examination and analysis of the interaction between economic activity, individuals and communities. Social economics focuses on the relationship between social action and economies, and examines how social and ethical norms influence the behaviour of economic agents. It is inescapably normative and focuses on needs, rather than wants or preferences, and considers the wellbeing of individuals in communities: it accepts the possibility of a common good rather than conceiving of communities as merely aggregates of individual preferences and the problems of economics as coordinating those preferences. Therefore, contributions are invited which analyse and discuss well-being, welfare, the nature of the good society, governance and social policy, social and economic justice, social and individual economic motivation, and the associated normative and ethical implications of these as they express themselves in, for example, issues concerning the environment, labour and work, education, the role of families and women, inequality and poverty, health and human development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信