Myths of German Graphite in World War II, with Original Translations

Patrick J. Park, Sebastian Herzele
{"title":"Myths of German Graphite in World War II, with Original Translations","authors":"Patrick J. Park, Sebastian Herzele","doi":"arxiv-2405.20801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We re-examine the common narrative that a 1941 experimental error by\nphysicists Walther Bothe and Peter Jensen led Germany to abandon graphite as a\nreactor moderator during World War II. We first detail the history of both\nGerman and American graphite experiments, noting that the Americans faced\nsimilar setbacks but succeeded only at the end of a costly 18-month graphite\npurification program. We then use Monte Carlo N-Particle simulations to\nreconstruct Bothe's 1941 experiment. We find the thermal absorption cross\nsection of Bothe's Siemens electrographite to be 12.2 mb, in contrast to his\nreported 7.9 mb. This discrepancy arises because the neutrons in Bothe's\nexperiment did not reach thermal equilibrium, leading to an underestimation of\nneutron absorption. Additionally, despite misconceptions that the Germans were\nunaware of boron impurities, we share evidence that Wilhelm Hanle accurately\nmeasured boron and cadmium impurities in the electrographite. To support our\nfindings, we provide 9 excerpted and 3 complete English translations of\nclassified wartime reports by Heisenberg, Joos, Bothe, Jensen, H\\\"ocker, Hanle,\nand Kremer. Our work aims to illuminate the rational constraints behind\nGermany's decision to forgo graphite moderation.","PeriodicalId":501042,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2405.20801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We re-examine the common narrative that a 1941 experimental error by physicists Walther Bothe and Peter Jensen led Germany to abandon graphite as a reactor moderator during World War II. We first detail the history of both German and American graphite experiments, noting that the Americans faced similar setbacks but succeeded only at the end of a costly 18-month graphite purification program. We then use Monte Carlo N-Particle simulations to reconstruct Bothe's 1941 experiment. We find the thermal absorption cross section of Bothe's Siemens electrographite to be 12.2 mb, in contrast to his reported 7.9 mb. This discrepancy arises because the neutrons in Bothe's experiment did not reach thermal equilibrium, leading to an underestimation of neutron absorption. Additionally, despite misconceptions that the Germans were unaware of boron impurities, we share evidence that Wilhelm Hanle accurately measured boron and cadmium impurities in the electrographite. To support our findings, we provide 9 excerpted and 3 complete English translations of classified wartime reports by Heisenberg, Joos, Bothe, Jensen, H\"ocker, Hanle, and Kremer. Our work aims to illuminate the rational constraints behind Germany's decision to forgo graphite moderation.
二战中的德国石墨神话,附原文翻译
我们重新审视了物理学家瓦尔特-博特(Walther Bothe)和彼得-延森(Peter Jensen)在 1941 年的一次实验失误导致德国在二战期间放弃将石墨作为反应物慢化剂的普遍说法。我们首先详细介绍了德国和美国石墨实验的历史,指出美国人面临着类似的挫折,但在耗时 18 个月的石墨提纯计划结束时才取得成功。然后,我们使用蒙特卡洛 N 粒子模拟来重建 Bothe 1941 年的实验。我们发现 Bothe 的西门子电石墨的热吸收截面为 12.2 mb,而他报告的截面为 7.9 mb。产生这一差异的原因是,博特实验中的中子没有达到热平衡,导致中子吸收率被低估。此外,尽管有人误认为德国人不知道硼杂质的存在,但我们有证据表明威廉-汉勒准确测量了电石墨中的硼和镉杂质。为了支持我们的发现,我们提供了海森堡、约斯、博特、延森、霍克、汉勒和克雷默的 9 份战时机密报告节选和 3 份完整的英文翻译。我们的工作旨在阐明德国决定放弃石墨节制背后的理性限制因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信