Sexual dimorphisms in body proportions of Masai giraffes and the evolution of the giraffe’s neck

IF 1.9 4区 生物学 Q1 ZOOLOGY
Douglas R. Cavener, Monica L. Bond, Lan Wu-Cavener, George G. Lohay, Mia W. Cavener, Xiaoyi Hou, David L. Pearce, Derek E. Lee
{"title":"Sexual dimorphisms in body proportions of Masai giraffes and the evolution of the giraffe’s neck","authors":"Douglas R. Cavener, Monica L. Bond, Lan Wu-Cavener, George G. Lohay, Mia W. Cavener, Xiaoyi Hou, David L. Pearce, Derek E. Lee","doi":"10.1007/s42991-024-00424-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Giraffes exhibit a large sexual dimorphism in body size. Whether sexual dimorphisms also exist in body proportions of the axial and appendicular skeleton has been debated, particularly regarding the giraffe’s iconic long neck. We examined the anatomical proportions of the neck, forelegs, hindlegs, and body trunk of the Masai giraffe (<i>G. tippelskirchi</i>) in captive and wild populations. We found that female Masai giraffes have proportionally longer necks relative to their forelegs than males in contradiction to the original necks-for-sex hypothesis that proposed that the evolution of the giraffe’s long neck was driven by male-male competition. However, male neck width and apparent mass are proportionally larger than females’, supporting a modification of the necks-for-sex hypothesis. Moreover, male foreleg length is proportionally longer whereas female trunk length is proportionally longer. These sexual dimorphisms were found in both captive and wild Masai giraffes. We speculate that the initial evolution of the giraffe’s long neck and legs was driven by interspecific competition and the maternal nutritional demands of gestation and lactation through natural selection to gain a competitive advantage in browsing, and then later the neck mass was further increased as a consequence of male-male competition and sexual selection. Differences in the proportions of major body components define sex phenotypes, but several giraffes display opposite-sex phenotypes with a significantly higher level of discordancy seen in captive males. We speculate that body proportion sexual dimorphisms are maintained in the wild by natural and/or sexual selection, but in captivity selection is relaxed resulting in a higher occurrence of discordances in sexual phenotypes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49888,"journal":{"name":"Mammalian Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mammalian Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42991-024-00424-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Giraffes exhibit a large sexual dimorphism in body size. Whether sexual dimorphisms also exist in body proportions of the axial and appendicular skeleton has been debated, particularly regarding the giraffe’s iconic long neck. We examined the anatomical proportions of the neck, forelegs, hindlegs, and body trunk of the Masai giraffe (G. tippelskirchi) in captive and wild populations. We found that female Masai giraffes have proportionally longer necks relative to their forelegs than males in contradiction to the original necks-for-sex hypothesis that proposed that the evolution of the giraffe’s long neck was driven by male-male competition. However, male neck width and apparent mass are proportionally larger than females’, supporting a modification of the necks-for-sex hypothesis. Moreover, male foreleg length is proportionally longer whereas female trunk length is proportionally longer. These sexual dimorphisms were found in both captive and wild Masai giraffes. We speculate that the initial evolution of the giraffe’s long neck and legs was driven by interspecific competition and the maternal nutritional demands of gestation and lactation through natural selection to gain a competitive advantage in browsing, and then later the neck mass was further increased as a consequence of male-male competition and sexual selection. Differences in the proportions of major body components define sex phenotypes, but several giraffes display opposite-sex phenotypes with a significantly higher level of discordancy seen in captive males. We speculate that body proportion sexual dimorphisms are maintained in the wild by natural and/or sexual selection, but in captivity selection is relaxed resulting in a higher occurrence of discordances in sexual phenotypes.

Abstract Image

马赛长颈鹿身体比例的性别异形和长颈鹿颈部的进化
长颈鹿在体型上表现出很大的性别二形性。关于长颈鹿的标志性长颈是否也存在身体轴向和附属骨骼比例上的性双态性,一直存在争议。我们研究了马赛长颈鹿(G. tippelskirchi)在圈养种群和野生种群中的颈部、前腿、后腿和身体躯干的解剖比例。我们发现,与雄性长颈鹿相比,雌性马赛长颈鹿的颈部相对于前腿更长,这与最初的 "颈部性别假说 "相矛盾,"颈部性别假说 "认为长颈鹿长颈的进化是由雄性长颈鹿之间的竞争驱动的。然而,雄性长颈鹿的颈宽和表观质量在比例上要大于雌性长颈鹿,这支持了颈部性别假说的修正。此外,雄性的前肢长度按比例来说更长,而雌性的躯干长度按比例来说更长。在圈养和野生马赛长颈鹿中都发现了这些性二态现象。我们推测,长颈鹿长颈和长腿的最初进化是由种间竞争以及妊娠和哺乳期的母性营养需求驱动的,通过自然选择获得了浏览方面的竞争优势,后来由于雄性与雄性之间的竞争和性选择,颈部质量进一步增加。身体主要组成部分比例的差异决定了性别表型,但有几种长颈鹿表现出相反的性别表型,其中圈养雄性长颈鹿的不和谐程度明显更高。我们推测,身体比例的性别二形性在野外是通过自然选择和/或性选择来维持的,但在人工饲养条件下,选择被放松,导致性表型不一致的发生率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mammalian Biology
Mammalian Biology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
127
审稿时长
10.1 weeks
期刊介绍: Mammalian Biology (formerly Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde) is an international scientific journal edited by the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Säugetierkunde (German Society for Mammalian Biology). The journal is devoted to the publication of research on mammals. Its scope covers all aspects of mammalian biology, such as anatomy, morphology, palaeontology, taxonomy, systematics, molecular biology, physiology, neurobiology, ethology, genetics, reproduction, development, evolutionary biology, domestication, ecology, wildlife biology and diseases, conservation biology, and the biology of zoo mammals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信