Does thinking about making money help people save money? Behavioral economics—monetary wisdom across genders: Ardent love of money aspirations and $1 million resource allocation

IF 1.9 Q2 ETHICS
Yuh-Jia Chen, Velma Lee, Thomas Li-Ping Tang
{"title":"Does thinking about making money help people save money? Behavioral economics—monetary wisdom across genders: Ardent love of money aspirations and $1 million resource allocation","authors":"Yuh-Jia Chen, Velma Lee, Thomas Li-Ping Tang","doi":"10.1007/s13520-024-00207-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Squandering lottery winners spend their money, leading to bankruptcy, murder, and suicide—a lottery curse. With a fixed amount of money, saving and spending are mutually exclusive. To study ordinary citizens’ behavioral decision-making, we follow Nobel Laureate Daniel Kahneman’s advice, incorporate ardent monetary aspirations—Rich, Motivator, Budget, Make, and Success as yoked antecedents of the latent construct—Monetary Wisdom (MW), frame MW in the context of income (Time 1), and explore individuals’ $1 million resource allocation (Time 2). Among full-time managers, thinking about Making money helps them Spend more and Save less. However, university students have lower incomes and more difficulty making money than managers. This study challenges the existing findings of full-time managers. We theorize that thinking about <b><i>Making</i></b> money helps students Save more and Spend less. We ask 443 students to imagine that after fulfilling tax obligations, they could freely allocate $1 million lottery money to 20 options (sum = 100%). Our results support our theory. Men have significantly higher incomes than women. The Paths from Factors Rich and Budget to MW are significantly stronger for men than women. With higher income, thoughts on becoming <b><i>Rich</i></b> and <b><i>Budgeting</i></b> money cause men to Spend more and Save less. Vigorous Budgeting thoughts may cause the depletion of self-control power, leading to self-control failure and Spending. Wanting to become Rich incites Spending. With lower income, thinking about <b><i>Making</i></b> money causes women to Save more and Spend less. Interestingly, women spend significantly <b><i>more</i></b> money on experiential and material consumptions and family, and <b><i>less</i></b> on investments (business and education) than men. The differences in Saving and Donating money to charity are non-significant across genders. Monetary Wisdom is not significantly related to income. We help people make happy, healthy, wealthy, ethical decisions, and mental accounting and avoid the lottery curse. The life you save may be your own.</p>","PeriodicalId":54051,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Business Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Business Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-024-00207-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Squandering lottery winners spend their money, leading to bankruptcy, murder, and suicide—a lottery curse. With a fixed amount of money, saving and spending are mutually exclusive. To study ordinary citizens’ behavioral decision-making, we follow Nobel Laureate Daniel Kahneman’s advice, incorporate ardent monetary aspirations—Rich, Motivator, Budget, Make, and Success as yoked antecedents of the latent construct—Monetary Wisdom (MW), frame MW in the context of income (Time 1), and explore individuals’ $1 million resource allocation (Time 2). Among full-time managers, thinking about Making money helps them Spend more and Save less. However, university students have lower incomes and more difficulty making money than managers. This study challenges the existing findings of full-time managers. We theorize that thinking about Making money helps students Save more and Spend less. We ask 443 students to imagine that after fulfilling tax obligations, they could freely allocate $1 million lottery money to 20 options (sum = 100%). Our results support our theory. Men have significantly higher incomes than women. The Paths from Factors Rich and Budget to MW are significantly stronger for men than women. With higher income, thoughts on becoming Rich and Budgeting money cause men to Spend more and Save less. Vigorous Budgeting thoughts may cause the depletion of self-control power, leading to self-control failure and Spending. Wanting to become Rich incites Spending. With lower income, thinking about Making money causes women to Save more and Spend less. Interestingly, women spend significantly more money on experiential and material consumptions and family, and less on investments (business and education) than men. The differences in Saving and Donating money to charity are non-significant across genders. Monetary Wisdom is not significantly related to income. We help people make happy, healthy, wealthy, ethical decisions, and mental accounting and avoid the lottery curse. The life you save may be your own.

Abstract Image

思考赚钱能帮助人们省钱吗?不同性别的行为经济学--金钱智慧:热衷于赚钱的愿望与 100 万美元的资源分配
彩票中奖者挥霍无度,导致破产、谋杀和自杀--这是彩票的诅咒。对于固定数额的资金,储蓄和消费是相互排斥的。为了研究普通公民的行为决策,我们遵循诺贝尔奖得主丹尼尔-卡尼曼(Daniel Kahneman)的建议,将热切的金钱愿望--"富有"(Rich)、"激励"(Motivator)、"预算"(Budget)、"赚钱"(Make)和 "成功"(Success)--作为潜在建构--"金钱智慧"(Monetary Wisdom,MW)--的轭状前因后果,将 "金钱智慧 "置于收入背景下(时间 1),并探讨个人的 100 万美元资源分配(时间 2)。在全职经理人中,"赚钱 "思维有助于他们 "多花钱,少省钱"。然而,与管理人员相比,大学生的收入更低,赚钱更困难。本研究对现有的全职经理人研究结果提出了质疑。我们推测,"赚钱 "的想法会帮助学生更多地储蓄,更少地消费。我们让 443 名学生想象,在履行纳税义务后,他们可以将 100 万美元的彩票资金自由分配给 20 个选项(总和 = 100%)。我们的结果支持我们的理论。男性的收入明显高于女性。男性从 "因素致富 "和 "预算致富 "的路径明显强于女性。收入越高,"致富 "和 "预算 "的想法就会导致男性花费更多而储蓄更少。强烈的预算想法可能会导致自我控制能力的耗竭,从而导致自我控制失败和消费。想致富会刺激消费。在收入较低的情况下,"赚钱 "的想法会让女性储蓄更多,支出更少。有趣的是,与男性相比,女性在体验性消费、物质消费和家庭方面的花费明显较多,而在投资(商业和教育)方面的花费较少。不同性别在储蓄和向慈善机构捐款方面的差异并不明显。金钱智慧与收入关系不大。我们帮助人们做出快乐、健康、富有、合乎道德的决定,进行心理核算,避免彩票诅咒。您拯救的可能是您自己的生命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
38.50%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Business Ethics (AJBE) publishes original articles from a wide variety of methodological and disciplinary perspectives concerning ethical issues related to business in Asia, including East, Southeast and South-central Asia. Like its well-known sister publication Journal of Business Ethics, AJBE examines the moral dimensions of production, consumption, labour relations, and organizational behavior, while taking into account the unique societal and ethical perspectives of the Asian region.  The term ''business'' is understood in a wide sense to include all systems involved in the exchange of goods and services, while ''ethics'' is understood as applying to all human action aimed at securing a good life. We believe that issues concerning corporate responsibility are within the scope of ethics broadly construed. Systems of production, consumption, marketing, advertising, social and economic accounting, labour relations, public relations and organizational behaviour will be analyzed from a moral or ethical point of view. The style and level of dialogue involve all who are interested in business ethics - the business community, universities, government agencies, non-government organizations and consumer groups.The AJBE viewpoint is especially relevant today, as global business initiatives bring eastern and western companies together in new and ever more complex patterns of cooperation and competition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信