Investigating the vaporization mechanism's effect on interfacial tension during gas injection into an oil reservoir

IF 2.4 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Hossein Mehrjoo, Ali Safaei, Yousef Kazemzadeh, Masoud Riazi, Atefe Hasan-zadeh
{"title":"Investigating the vaporization mechanism's effect on interfacial tension during gas injection into an oil reservoir","authors":"Hossein Mehrjoo, Ali Safaei, Yousef Kazemzadeh, Masoud Riazi, Atefe Hasan-zadeh","doi":"10.1007/s13202-024-01821-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In gas injection, which is one of the fascinating enhanced oil recovery techniques, the main mechanism involves decreasing interfacial tension (IFT). Although various mechanisms can affect the IFT of a system, in most experimental and numerical studies, condensation is considered the dominant mechanism among condensation-vaporization and vaporization. Investigating the impact of each mechanism is crucial as they can influence the IFT of the system and, consequently, the effectiveness of the gas injection method. This study introduces a novel model to assess the influence of different mechanisms on system IFT. The model defines system IFT, adjusts fluid relative permeability to represent miscible, immiscible, and near-miscible states, and utilizes the Buckley–Leverett method to analyze gas fractional flow and saturation profiles when injecting carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), methane (CH<sub>4</sub>), and nitrogen (N<sub>2</sub>). Furthermore, the research explores the impact of injection pressure and IFT at minimum miscible pressure (IFT0) on gas injection efficiency. Based on our results, for both live and dead oil, the condensation mechanism reduces IFT and near-miscible pressure; switching to a condensing-vaporizing mechanism increases these parameters. This trend was consistent across all gases studied (N<sub>2</sub>, CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>), with a more significant effect observed on the CH<sub>4</sub>-live oil system compared to N<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub>. Controlling the condensing mechanism in IFT measurements enhances gas flow rate and relative permeability curve within the medium. Higher injection pressure in the condensing mechanism and IFT0 = 0.5 leads to faster fluid movement and improved relative permeability due to increased driving forces. Higher IFT0 accelerates the relative permeability of fluids and gas movement within the medium by promoting miscibility sooner. The impact of IFT0 was more pronounced on the dead oil–gas system compared to the live oil–gas system in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":16723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-024-01821-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In gas injection, which is one of the fascinating enhanced oil recovery techniques, the main mechanism involves decreasing interfacial tension (IFT). Although various mechanisms can affect the IFT of a system, in most experimental and numerical studies, condensation is considered the dominant mechanism among condensation-vaporization and vaporization. Investigating the impact of each mechanism is crucial as they can influence the IFT of the system and, consequently, the effectiveness of the gas injection method. This study introduces a novel model to assess the influence of different mechanisms on system IFT. The model defines system IFT, adjusts fluid relative permeability to represent miscible, immiscible, and near-miscible states, and utilizes the Buckley–Leverett method to analyze gas fractional flow and saturation profiles when injecting carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrogen (N2). Furthermore, the research explores the impact of injection pressure and IFT at minimum miscible pressure (IFT0) on gas injection efficiency. Based on our results, for both live and dead oil, the condensation mechanism reduces IFT and near-miscible pressure; switching to a condensing-vaporizing mechanism increases these parameters. This trend was consistent across all gases studied (N2, CO2, CH4), with a more significant effect observed on the CH4-live oil system compared to N2 and CO2. Controlling the condensing mechanism in IFT measurements enhances gas flow rate and relative permeability curve within the medium. Higher injection pressure in the condensing mechanism and IFT0 = 0.5 leads to faster fluid movement and improved relative permeability due to increased driving forces. Higher IFT0 accelerates the relative permeability of fluids and gas movement within the medium by promoting miscibility sooner. The impact of IFT0 was more pronounced on the dead oil–gas system compared to the live oil–gas system in this study.

Abstract Image

研究油藏注气过程中气化机制对界面张力的影响
注气是令人着迷的提高石油采收率技术之一,其主要机理是降低界面张力(IFT)。虽然各种机制都会影响系统的 IFT,但在大多数实验和数值研究中,冷凝被认为是冷凝-蒸发和汽化之间的主要机制。研究每种机制的影响至关重要,因为它们都会影响系统的 IFT,进而影响气体注入方法的有效性。本研究引入了一个新模型来评估不同机制对系统 IFT 的影响。该模型定义了系统 IFT,调整流体相对渗透率以表示混溶、不混溶和近混溶状态,并利用 Buckley-Leverett 方法分析注入二氧化碳 (CO2)、甲烷 (CH4) 和氮气 (N2) 时的气体分流量和饱和度剖面。此外,研究还探讨了注入压力和最小混溶压力(IFT0)下的 IFT 对气体注入效率的影响。根据我们的研究结果,对于活油和死油,冷凝机制会降低 IFT 和接近混溶压力;而切换到冷凝-蒸发机制则会提高这些参数。这一趋势在所研究的所有气体(N2、CO2、CH4)中都是一致的,与 N2 和 CO2 相比,在 CH4-活油系统中观察到的影响更为显著。在 IFT 测量中控制冷凝机制可提高介质内的气体流速和相对渗透率曲线。由于驱动力增加,冷凝机制中较高的注入压力和 IFT0 = 0.5 会导致流体流动速度加快,相对渗透率提高。较高的 IFT0 可促进混溶,从而加快介质内流体和气体的相对渗透率。与本研究中的活油气系统相比,IFT0 对死油气系统的影响更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
151
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology is an international open access journal that publishes original and review articles as well as book reviews on leading edge studies in the field of petroleum engineering, petroleum geology and exploration geophysics and the implementation of related technologies to the development and management of oil and gas reservoirs from their discovery through their entire production cycle. Focusing on: Reservoir characterization and modeling Unconventional oil and gas reservoirs Geophysics: Acquisition and near surface Geophysics Modeling and Imaging Geophysics: Interpretation Geophysics: Processing Production Engineering Formation Evaluation Reservoir Management Petroleum Geology Enhanced Recovery Geomechanics Drilling Completions The Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology is committed to upholding the integrity of the scientific record. As a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) the journal will follow the COPE guidelines on how to deal with potential acts of misconduct. Authors should refrain from misrepresenting research results which could damage the trust in the journal and ultimately the entire scientific endeavor. Maintaining integrity of the research and its presentation can be achieved by following the rules of good scientific practice as detailed here: https://www.springer.com/us/editorial-policies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信