In-depth Correlation Power Analysis Attacks on a Hardware Implementation of CRYSTALS-Dilithium

IF 3.9 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Huaxin Wang, Yiwen Gao, Yuejun Liu, Qian Zhang, Yongbin Zhou
{"title":"In-depth Correlation Power Analysis Attacks on a Hardware Implementation of CRYSTALS-Dilithium","authors":"Huaxin Wang, Yiwen Gao, Yuejun Liu, Qian Zhang, Yongbin Zhou","doi":"10.1186/s42400-024-00209-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>During the standardisation process of post-quantum cryptography, NIST encourages research on side-channel analysis for candidate schemes. As the recommended lattice signature scheme, CRYSTALS-Dilithium, when implemented on hardware, has seen limited research on side-channel analysis, and current attacks are incomplete or requires a substantial quantity of traces. Therefore, we conducted a more complete analysis to investigate the leakage of an FPGA implementation of CRYSTALS-Dilithium using the Correlation Power Analysis (CPA) method, where with a minimum of 70,000 traces partial private key coefficients can be recovered. Furthermore, we optimise the attack by extracting Point-of-Interests using known information due to parallelism (named CPA-PoI) and by iteratively utilising parallel leakages (named CPA-ITR). Our experimental results show that CPA-PoI reduces the number of traces by up to 16.67%, CPA-ITR by up to 25%, and both increase the number of recovered key coefficients by up to 55.17% and 93.10% using the same number of traces. They outperfom the CPA method. As a result, it suggests that the FPGA implementation of CRYSTALS-Dilithium is more vulnerable than thought before to side-channel analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":36402,"journal":{"name":"Cybersecurity","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cybersecurity","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42400-024-00209-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the standardisation process of post-quantum cryptography, NIST encourages research on side-channel analysis for candidate schemes. As the recommended lattice signature scheme, CRYSTALS-Dilithium, when implemented on hardware, has seen limited research on side-channel analysis, and current attacks are incomplete or requires a substantial quantity of traces. Therefore, we conducted a more complete analysis to investigate the leakage of an FPGA implementation of CRYSTALS-Dilithium using the Correlation Power Analysis (CPA) method, where with a minimum of 70,000 traces partial private key coefficients can be recovered. Furthermore, we optimise the attack by extracting Point-of-Interests using known information due to parallelism (named CPA-PoI) and by iteratively utilising parallel leakages (named CPA-ITR). Our experimental results show that CPA-PoI reduces the number of traces by up to 16.67%, CPA-ITR by up to 25%, and both increase the number of recovered key coefficients by up to 55.17% and 93.10% using the same number of traces. They outperfom the CPA method. As a result, it suggests that the FPGA implementation of CRYSTALS-Dilithium is more vulnerable than thought before to side-channel analysis.

Abstract Image

对 CRYSTALS-Dilithium 硬件实现的深度相关功率分析攻击
在后量子加密技术的标准化过程中,NIST 鼓励对候选方案进行侧信道分析研究。作为推荐的晶格签名方案,CRYSTALS-Dilithium 在硬件上实现时,对侧信道分析的研究非常有限,目前的攻击不完整或需要大量的跟踪。因此,我们使用相关功率分析 (CPA) 方法进行了更全面的分析,研究了 CRYSTALS-Dilithium FPGA 实现的泄漏情况,只需最少 70,000 条跟踪记录就能恢复部分私钥系数。此外,我们还通过利用并行性(命名为 CPA-PoI)和迭代利用并行泄漏(命名为 CPA-ITR)造成的已知信息提取兴趣点来优化攻击。我们的实验结果表明,CPA-PoI 最多可减少 16.67% 的跟踪次数,CPA-ITR 最多可减少 25% 的跟踪次数,而且在跟踪次数相同的情况下,这两种方法分别最多可增加 55.17% 和 93.10% 的密钥系数恢复率。它们都优于 CPA 方法。结果表明,CRYSTALS-Dilithium 的 FPGA 实现比以前想象的更容易受到侧信道分析的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cybersecurity
Cybersecurity Computer Science-Information Systems
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信