Transport collaboration network among competitors to improve supply chain antifragility

IF 5 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Mar Vazquez-Noguerol, Jose A. Comesaña-Benavides, J. Carlos Prado-Prado, Pedro Amorim
{"title":"Transport collaboration network among competitors to improve supply chain antifragility","authors":"Mar Vazquez-Noguerol, Jose A. Comesaña-Benavides, J. Carlos Prado-Prado, Pedro Amorim","doi":"10.1108/ejim-12-2023-1094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Disruptions are appearing more frequently and having an ever greater impact on supply chains (SC), affecting the vulnerability and sustainability of organisations. Our study proposes an innovative approach to address contemporary challenges by introducing coopetition as a strategic capability. The aim of this study is to enable companies to adapt and thrive by applying a tool that measures and monitors different logistical scenarios to improve performance and antifragility.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>With the aim of jointly planning transport activities of two competing companies, we present a linear programming model that promotes synergies which enhance resource utilisation. To demonstrate the validity of the model, a case study is conducted to measure, monitor and evaluate the results obtained after collaborating on SC activities.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Current tools to support logistics planning are not effective because they hamper information exchange, cost allocation and performance measurements. Our innovative model optimises collaborative networks (CNs) and monitors economic, environmental and social improvements. The case study shows the reduction of logistics costs (13%), carbon footprint (37%) and the improvement of social antifragility when agility and flexibility emerge.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>CNs have become an effective means of enhancing resilience, but there are no empirical contributions to demonstrate how to achieve this. We provide a real case with computational experiments that provide empirical evidence of the effectiveness of the model, which measures, optimises and evaluates SC performance in coopetitive environments. This approach is a guide to researchers and practitioners when creating simulations to reduce risks and facilitate decision-making.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":51462,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Innovation Management","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Innovation Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-12-2023-1094","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Disruptions are appearing more frequently and having an ever greater impact on supply chains (SC), affecting the vulnerability and sustainability of organisations. Our study proposes an innovative approach to address contemporary challenges by introducing coopetition as a strategic capability. The aim of this study is to enable companies to adapt and thrive by applying a tool that measures and monitors different logistical scenarios to improve performance and antifragility.

Design/methodology/approach

With the aim of jointly planning transport activities of two competing companies, we present a linear programming model that promotes synergies which enhance resource utilisation. To demonstrate the validity of the model, a case study is conducted to measure, monitor and evaluate the results obtained after collaborating on SC activities.

Findings

Current tools to support logistics planning are not effective because they hamper information exchange, cost allocation and performance measurements. Our innovative model optimises collaborative networks (CNs) and monitors economic, environmental and social improvements. The case study shows the reduction of logistics costs (13%), carbon footprint (37%) and the improvement of social antifragility when agility and flexibility emerge.

Originality/value

CNs have become an effective means of enhancing resilience, but there are no empirical contributions to demonstrate how to achieve this. We provide a real case with computational experiments that provide empirical evidence of the effectiveness of the model, which measures, optimises and evaluates SC performance in coopetitive environments. This approach is a guide to researchers and practitioners when creating simulations to reduce risks and facilitate decision-making.

竞争者之间的运输协作网络,提高供应链的反脆弱性
目的破坏性事件越来越频繁地出现,对供应链(SC)的影响也越来越大,影响到组织的脆弱性和可持续性。我们的研究提出了一种创新方法,通过引入合作竞争这一战略能力来应对当代挑战。本研究的目的是通过应用一种工具来衡量和监控不同的物流方案,以提高绩效和反脆弱性,从而使企业能够适应环境并茁壮成长。设计/方法/途径为了联合规划两家相互竞争的公司的运输活动,我们提出了一个线性规划模型,以促进协同效应,提高资源利用率。为了证明该模型的有效性,我们进行了一项案例研究,以衡量、监测和评估合作开展 SC 活动后取得的成果。研究结果目前支持物流规划的工具并不有效,因为它们妨碍了信息交流、成本分配和绩效衡量。我们的创新模式可优化协作网络(CN),并监测经济、环境和社会方面的改善情况。案例研究显示,当敏捷性和灵活性出现时,物流成本降低了 13%,碳足迹减少了 37%,社会反脆弱性也得到了改善。我们通过计算实验提供了一个真实案例,为该模型的有效性提供了经验证据,该模型可衡量、优化和评估合作竞争环境中的 SC 性能。这种方法为研究人员和从业人员创建模拟模型以降低风险和促进决策提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
17.60%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: The subject of innovation is receiving increased interest both from companies because of their increased awareness of the impact of innovation in determining market success and also from the research community. Academics are increasingly beginning to place innovation as a priority area in their research agenda. This impetus has been partly fuelled by the Economic & Social Research Council (ESRC) who have designated innovation as one of nine research areas in their research initiative schemes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信