Response of durum wheat vs. bread wheat to Fusarium foot and root rot under semi-arid conditions

IF 2.2 4区 农林科学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Samira Chekali, Sourour Ayed, Eya Khemir, Mohamed Saleh Gharbi, Salem Marzougui, Timothy Paulitz, Samia Gargouri
{"title":"Response of durum wheat vs. bread wheat to Fusarium foot and root rot under semi-arid conditions","authors":"Samira Chekali, Sourour Ayed, Eya Khemir, Mohamed Saleh Gharbi, Salem Marzougui, Timothy Paulitz, Samia Gargouri","doi":"10.1007/s42161-024-01659-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Fusarium foot and root rot is one of the most important soilborne diseases of cereals, specifically on durum wheat which is the main cultivated species in the Mediterranean regions. This work aimed to evaluate the response of durum wheat and bread wheat to this disease under different climatic conditions. The disease parameters, grain yield loss as well as thousand kernel weight (TKW), heading date and height of plant were evaluated on 29 durum and bread wheat genotypes during two years. Overall, durum wheat grain yield was strongly and negatively correlated with disease parameters, heading date, and positively with plant height and TKW compared to bread wheat. In the drier year, the 24 durum wheat genotypes were more susceptible to the disease than the five bread wheat varieties while some of them showed less disease during the wetter year. Bread wheat maintained the same behavior in both years vs. durum wheat. Grain yield loss was higher on durum wheat compared to bread wheat. It was the same in both years (56 and 51%) for durum wheat and was significantly (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) lower in the drier (24%) compared to the wetter year (44%) for bread wheat. This work confirmed the susceptibility of Tunisian durum wheat to the disease compared to bread wheat and calls attention to the potential vulnerability of this important Mediterranean food crop under a hotter, drier climate. More research is needed to investigate adaptation to drought and plant defense mechanisms and to breed for resistance to this disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":16837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plant Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plant Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42161-024-01659-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fusarium foot and root rot is one of the most important soilborne diseases of cereals, specifically on durum wheat which is the main cultivated species in the Mediterranean regions. This work aimed to evaluate the response of durum wheat and bread wheat to this disease under different climatic conditions. The disease parameters, grain yield loss as well as thousand kernel weight (TKW), heading date and height of plant were evaluated on 29 durum and bread wheat genotypes during two years. Overall, durum wheat grain yield was strongly and negatively correlated with disease parameters, heading date, and positively with plant height and TKW compared to bread wheat. In the drier year, the 24 durum wheat genotypes were more susceptible to the disease than the five bread wheat varieties while some of them showed less disease during the wetter year. Bread wheat maintained the same behavior in both years vs. durum wheat. Grain yield loss was higher on durum wheat compared to bread wheat. It was the same in both years (56 and 51%) for durum wheat and was significantly (p < 0.01) lower in the drier (24%) compared to the wetter year (44%) for bread wheat. This work confirmed the susceptibility of Tunisian durum wheat to the disease compared to bread wheat and calls attention to the potential vulnerability of this important Mediterranean food crop under a hotter, drier climate. More research is needed to investigate adaptation to drought and plant defense mechanisms and to breed for resistance to this disease.

Abstract Image

硬粒小麦与面包小麦在半干旱条件下对镰刀菌根茎腐病的反应
根腐镰刀菌病是谷物最重要的土传病害之一,特别是对地中海地区主要种植品种硬粒小麦的危害。这项研究旨在评估硬粒小麦和面包小麦在不同气候条件下对这种病害的反应。在两年时间里,对 29 个硬质小麦和面包小麦基因型的病害参数、谷物产量损失以及千粒重(TKW)、抽穗期和株高进行了评估。总体而言,与面包小麦相比,硬粒小麦的谷物产量与病害参数和打顶日期呈负相关,与株高和千粒重呈正相关。在较干旱的年份,24 个硬粒小麦基因型比 5 个面包小麦品种更易感染病害,而在较潮湿的年份,其中一些基因型的病害较轻。面包小麦与硬质小麦在这两年的表现相同。硬质小麦的谷物产量损失高于面包小麦。硬质小麦在这两年的减产率相同(分别为 56% 和 51%),面包小麦在较干旱年份的减产率(24%)显著低于较潮湿年份的减产率(44%)(p < 0.01)。这项研究证实,与面包小麦相比,突尼斯硬粒小麦更容易感染这种疾病,并提醒人们注意这种重要的地中海粮食作物在更炎热、更干燥的气候条件下的潜在脆弱性。需要进行更多的研究,以调查对干旱的适应性和植物防御机制,并培育抗这种疾病的品种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Plant Pathology
Journal of Plant Pathology 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
218
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Plant Pathology (JPP or JPPY) is the main publication of the Italian Society of Plant Pathology (SiPAV), and publishes original contributions in the form of full-length papers, short communications, disease notes, and review articles on mycology, bacteriology, virology, phytoplasmatology, physiological plant pathology, plant-pathogeninteractions, post-harvest diseases, non-infectious diseases, and plant protection. In vivo results are required for plant protection submissions. Varietal trials for disease resistance and gene mapping are not published in the journal unless such findings are already employed in the context of strategic approaches for disease management. However, studies identifying actual genes involved in virulence are pertinent to thescope of the Journal and may be submitted. The journal highlights particularly timely or novel contributions in its Editors’ choice section, to appear at the beginning of each volume. Surveys for diseases or pathogens should be submitted as "Short communications".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信