Inequality Without Class

IF 0.6 4区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Dissent Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI:10.1353/dss.2024.a929039
Simon Torracinta
{"title":"Inequality Without Class","authors":"Simon Torracinta","doi":"10.1353/dss.2024.a929039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An academic journal article on the technicalities of tax data is not usually cause for much excitement. Yet at the end of last year, one such publication in the Journal of Political Economy set #Econtwitter afire with debate, and prompted a full column in the Economist. The paper, by Gerald Auten and David Splinter, took aim at the famous studies on rising inequality conducted by Thomas Piketty, Emmanuel Saez, and Gabriel Zucman. If one employs different assumptions, Auten and Splinter argued, post-tax income inequality in the United States appears not to have risen much since the 1960s. While Piketty and his collaborators systematically challenged the findings, their detractors were quick to the draw. \"The Piketty and Saez work is careless and politically motivated,\" sniped James Heckman, a Nobel-winning Chicago School econometrician.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":51822,"journal":{"name":"Dissent","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dissent","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/dss.2024.a929039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An academic journal article on the technicalities of tax data is not usually cause for much excitement. Yet at the end of last year, one such publication in the Journal of Political Economy set #Econtwitter afire with debate, and prompted a full column in the Economist. The paper, by Gerald Auten and David Splinter, took aim at the famous studies on rising inequality conducted by Thomas Piketty, Emmanuel Saez, and Gabriel Zucman. If one employs different assumptions, Auten and Splinter argued, post-tax income inequality in the United States appears not to have risen much since the 1960s. While Piketty and his collaborators systematically challenged the findings, their detractors were quick to the draw. "The Piketty and Saez work is careless and politically motivated," sniped James Heckman, a Nobel-winning Chicago School econometrician.

没有阶级的不平等
学术期刊上一篇关于税收数据技术细节的文章通常不会引起太大的轰动。然而,去年年底,《政治经济学杂志》上发表的一篇这样的文章却在 #Econtwitter 上引发了热议,并促使《经济学人》开辟了一个完整的专栏。这篇论文由杰拉尔德-奥滕(Gerald Auten)和大卫-斯普林特(David Splinter)撰写,矛头直指托马斯-皮凯蒂(Thomas Piketty)、埃马纽埃尔-萨兹(Emmanuel Saez)和加布里埃尔-祖克曼(Gabriel Zucman)就不平等加剧所做的著名研究。奥腾和斯普林特认为,如果采用不同的假设,美国的税后收入不平等自 20 世纪 60 年代以来似乎并没有上升多少。虽然皮凯蒂和他的合作者系统地质疑了这一研究结果,但他们的诋毁者也很快作出了回应。"诺贝尔经济学奖得主、芝加哥学派计量经济学家詹姆斯-赫克曼(James Heckman)讥讽道:"皮凯蒂和萨兹的研究是粗心大意和出于政治动机的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dissent
Dissent Multiple-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信