Methodological characteristics in technology-mediated task-based language teaching research: Current practices and future directions

IF 2.8 1区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
YouJin Kim, Yoon Namkung
{"title":"Methodological characteristics in technology-mediated task-based language teaching research: Current practices and future directions","authors":"YouJin Kim, Yoon Namkung","doi":"10.1017/s0267190524000096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the past two decades, the synergistic relationship among task-based language teaching (TBLT), instructed second language acquisition, and computer-assisted language learning has gained increasing interest.Technology-mediated TBLT combines these three research domains by integrating the use of technology with task-based approaches for second language (L2) learning purposes. Since the emergence of this framework, empirical studies have increasingly explored the incorporation of tasks with technology-mediated settings for L2 learning and teaching purposes. To understand the methodological characteristics of technology-mediated TBLT research to date, we conducted a systematic search and reviewed 254 technology-mediated TBLT studies published between 2000 and 2022 in peer-reviewed journals and book chapters. These studies were coded for methodological features, research foci, and types of technology. We further examined the role of technologies in task performance to identify their effectiveness in creating authentic tasks. The findings revealed that technology-mediated TBLT research investigated a rather limited scope of contexts, learner groups, and linguistic features, with little attention paid to evaluating the quality of task outcomes. The types of technology used were skewed toward computer-mediated communication. The results also showed that studies examined various interactional features, and the majority reported both quantitative and qualitative data. Furthermore, technologies were integrated into task design to create meaningful language use contexts. Based on these findings, we share suggestions for future technology-mediated TBLT research.</p>","PeriodicalId":47490,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Applied Linguistics","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190524000096","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the past two decades, the synergistic relationship among task-based language teaching (TBLT), instructed second language acquisition, and computer-assisted language learning has gained increasing interest.Technology-mediated TBLT combines these three research domains by integrating the use of technology with task-based approaches for second language (L2) learning purposes. Since the emergence of this framework, empirical studies have increasingly explored the incorporation of tasks with technology-mediated settings for L2 learning and teaching purposes. To understand the methodological characteristics of technology-mediated TBLT research to date, we conducted a systematic search and reviewed 254 technology-mediated TBLT studies published between 2000 and 2022 in peer-reviewed journals and book chapters. These studies were coded for methodological features, research foci, and types of technology. We further examined the role of technologies in task performance to identify their effectiveness in creating authentic tasks. The findings revealed that technology-mediated TBLT research investigated a rather limited scope of contexts, learner groups, and linguistic features, with little attention paid to evaluating the quality of task outcomes. The types of technology used were skewed toward computer-mediated communication. The results also showed that studies examined various interactional features, and the majority reported both quantitative and qualitative data. Furthermore, technologies were integrated into task design to create meaningful language use contexts. Based on these findings, we share suggestions for future technology-mediated TBLT research.

以技术为中介的任务型语言教学研究的方法特点:当前实践与未来方向
在过去的二十年里,任务型语言教学(TBLT)、指导性第二语言习得和计算机辅助语言学习之间的协同关系越来越受到关注。以技术为中介的任务型语言教学将这三个研究领域结合起来,将技术的使用与任务型方法相结合,以达到第二语言(L2)学习的目的。自这一框架出现以来,越来越多的实证研究开始探索将任务与以技术为中介的第二语言学习和教学环境相结合。为了了解迄今为止以技术为中介的 TBLT 研究在方法论方面的特点,我们进行了一次系统性搜索,并查阅了 2000 年至 2022 年间发表在同行评审期刊和书籍章节中的 254 篇以技术为中介的 TBLT 研究。我们对这些研究的方法特征、研究重点和技术类型进行了编码。我们进一步研究了技术在任务执行中的作用,以确定它们在创建真实任务中的有效性。研究结果表明,以技术为中介的 TBLT 研究对情境、学习者群体和语言特点的调查范围相当有限,而且很少关注任务成果质量的评估。所使用的技术类型偏向于计算机辅助交流。研究结果还显示,这些研究考察了各种互动特征,大多数研究同时报告了定量和定性数据。此外,研究还将技术融入任务设计,以创造有意义的语言使用情境。基于这些发现,我们对未来以技术为媒介的 TBLT 研究提出了一些建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.40%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The Annual Review of Applied Linguistics publishes research on key topics in the broad field of applied linguistics. Each issue is thematic, providing a variety of perspectives on the topic through research summaries, critical overviews, position papers and empirical studies. Being responsive to the field, some issues are tied to the theme of that year''s annual conference of the American Association for Applied Linguistics. Also, at regular intervals an issue will take the approach of covering applied linguistics as a field more broadly, including coverage of critical or controversial topics. ARAL provides cutting-edge and timely articles on a wide number of areas, including language learning and pedagogy, second language acquisition, sociolinguistics, language policy and planning, language assessment, and research design and methodology, to name just a few.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信