Is surgical quality more important than radicality? Long-term outcomes of stage I–III colon cancer (SAKK 40/00)

Abstract

Background

To prospectively determine the influence of variations of surgical radicality and surgical quality on long-term outcome in patients with stage I-III colon cancer.

Methods

From a prospective multicenter cohort study including 1040 patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer from 09/2001 to 06/2005 in nine Swiss and one German hospital, 423 patients with stage I-III colon cancer were selected and analyzed. Surgeons and pathologists filled in standardized forms prospectively assessing items of oncosurgical radicality and quality. Patients had standardized follow-up according to national guidelines.

Results

Follow-up was median 6.2 years (range 0.3–10.4) showing a 5-year disease-free survival/overall survival of 83 %/87 % in stage I (n = 85), 69 %/77 % in stage II (n = 187), and 53 %/61 % in stage III (n = 151) colon cancer. Despite remarkable variations of oncosurgical radicality and quality, the multivariate model revealed that mainly quality items correlated significantly with disease-free survival (surgical tumor lesion HR 2.12, p = 0.036, perioperative blood transfusion HR 1.67, p = 0.018, emergency resection HR 1.74, p = 0.035) and overall survival (early venous ligation HR 0.66, p = 0.023, surgical tumor lesion HR 2.28, p = 0.027, perioperative blood transfusion HR1.79, p = 0.010, emergency resection HR 1.88, p = 0.026), while radicality parameters (length of specimen, distance of the tumor to nearest bowel resection site, number of lymph nodes, height of resected mesocolon and of central vascular dissection) did not.

Conclusion

Surgical quality seems to have a stronger impact on oncologic long-term outcome in stage I – III colon cancer than surgical radicality.