Best Practices in Clinical Education: A Site Visit Decision-Making Model in Physical Therapist Education.

Journal of Allied Health Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Lori Hochman, Nicki Silberman, R Joe Palmer, Jamie L Greco
{"title":"Best Practices in Clinical Education: A Site Visit Decision-Making Model in Physical Therapist Education.","authors":"Lori Hochman, Nicki Silberman, R Joe Palmer, Jamie L Greco","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stakeholders in health science education engage in site visits during student clinical education experiences, which may occur in person or remotely via videoconference, telephone, or email. Significant variability in practice highlights the need for a more consistent approach to conducting site visits based on evidence-based best practices. Site visits can be burdensome to both clinical and academic stakeholders considering the significant time and resources needed to conduct them effectively. Despite these obstacles, site visits have been shown to add value to the clinical experience for all parties involved. This paper presents the available literature in health science education regarding clinical site visits and describes how it was used to develop and implement a model of best practice for conducting clinical site visits in physical therapist education. The Site Visit Decision-Making Model is based upon findings from contemporary research exploring the interests of each stakeholder, as well as the multifaceted and purposeful decision-making process that takes place when conducting site visits in physical therapist clinical education. Implementation of this model may assist academic stakeholders in health science education in prioritizing which methods of communication for conducting site visits are most effective and efficient.</p>","PeriodicalId":35979,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allied Health","volume":"53 2","pages":"e115-e124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allied Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stakeholders in health science education engage in site visits during student clinical education experiences, which may occur in person or remotely via videoconference, telephone, or email. Significant variability in practice highlights the need for a more consistent approach to conducting site visits based on evidence-based best practices. Site visits can be burdensome to both clinical and academic stakeholders considering the significant time and resources needed to conduct them effectively. Despite these obstacles, site visits have been shown to add value to the clinical experience for all parties involved. This paper presents the available literature in health science education regarding clinical site visits and describes how it was used to develop and implement a model of best practice for conducting clinical site visits in physical therapist education. The Site Visit Decision-Making Model is based upon findings from contemporary research exploring the interests of each stakeholder, as well as the multifaceted and purposeful decision-making process that takes place when conducting site visits in physical therapist clinical education. Implementation of this model may assist academic stakeholders in health science education in prioritizing which methods of communication for conducting site visits are most effective and efficient.

临床教育的最佳实践:物理治疗师教育中的实地考察决策模式。
健康科学教育的利益相关者在学生临床教育经历中进行实地考察,这种考察可能是亲自进行,也可能是通过视频会议、电话或电子邮件远程进行。实践中存在的巨大差异凸显了基于循证最佳实践进行实地考察的更一致方法的必要性。考虑到有效进行实地考察需要大量的时间和资源,实地考察对临床和学术利益相关者来说都是一种负担。尽管存在这些障碍,但实地考察已被证明能为所有相关方的临床经验增添价值。本文介绍了健康科学教育中有关临床实地考察的现有文献,并描述了如何利用这些文献来开发和实施在物理治疗师教育中进行临床实地考察的最佳实践模式。实地考察决策模型基于当代研究的发现,探索了每个利益相关者的利益,以及在物理治疗师临床教育中进行实地考察时所发生的多方面、有目的的决策过程。该模型的实施可帮助健康科学教育领域的学术利益相关者优先选择最有效、最高效的实地考察沟通方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Allied Health
Journal of Allied Health Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of Allied Health is the official publication of the Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions (ASAHP) . The Journal is the only interdisciplinary allied health periodical, publishing scholarly works related to research and development, feature articles, research abstracts and book reviews. Readers of The Journal comprise allied health leaders, educators, faculty and students. Subscribers to The Journal consist of domestic and international college and university libraries, health organizations and hospitals. Almost 20% of subscribers, in the last three years, have been from outside of the United States. Subscribers include the World Health Organization, the American Medical Association and major universities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信