Reaching back to enhance the future: the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Pipeline Program.

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open Pub Date : 2024-06-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1136/tsaco-2023-001339
Bethany Lauren Strong, Latoya Silverton, William Wical, Sharon M Henry
{"title":"Reaching back to enhance the future: the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Pipeline Program.","authors":"Bethany Lauren Strong, Latoya Silverton, William Wical, Sharon M Henry","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2023-001339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>There are significant disparities in the surgical workforce in comparison with medical student demographics. Pipeline programs have shown to be effective in addressing gaps. The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Committee designed a longitudinal pipeline program with high school student mentees and surgeon mentors providing an in-person hands-on workshop.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The mentee demographics and socioeconomic status at the time of application were determined using overall percentages and the Area Deprivation Index (ADI). Program application essays were qualitatively analyzed for common themes. The pre-workshop and post-workshop and 6-month follow-up surveys were analyzed for mentee experience and areas for improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mentees selected were 30% male (N=3 of 10), 70% female (N=7 of 10), 50% black or African American (N=5 of 10) and 30% Hispanic or Latinx (N=3 of 10). The majority of mentees were in the most disadvantaged groups in their state by the ADI (N=8 of 9, 89%). Many of the application essays highlighted a personal loss as driving the interest in a health career with several of those losses based on 'gun violence'. There was under-representation in medicine racial/ethnic or gender concordance for 80% (N=8 of 10) of the mentee-mentor pairings. In the pre-workshop survey, even those students with high-grade point averages and strong academic achievement in science courses indicated low confidence in their ability to succeed. Most students (N=7 of 10, 70%) reported a strong positive connection with their mentor in the post-workshop survey. There was a reduction in self-identified modifiable barriers to success for 83% (N=5 of 6) of the mentees. One-third of students who responded to the 6-month survey indicated that they had issues with maintaining contact with their mentors after the workshop.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pipeline program was able to reach the target demographic and increase interest in surgery. Positive mentee/mentor relationships were formed. There are improvements to be made in longitudinal components of the program to ensure lasting results.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"9 1","pages":"e001339"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11149148/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2023-001339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: There are significant disparities in the surgical workforce in comparison with medical student demographics. Pipeline programs have shown to be effective in addressing gaps. The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Committee designed a longitudinal pipeline program with high school student mentees and surgeon mentors providing an in-person hands-on workshop.

Methods: The mentee demographics and socioeconomic status at the time of application were determined using overall percentages and the Area Deprivation Index (ADI). Program application essays were qualitatively analyzed for common themes. The pre-workshop and post-workshop and 6-month follow-up surveys were analyzed for mentee experience and areas for improvement.

Results: Mentees selected were 30% male (N=3 of 10), 70% female (N=7 of 10), 50% black or African American (N=5 of 10) and 30% Hispanic or Latinx (N=3 of 10). The majority of mentees were in the most disadvantaged groups in their state by the ADI (N=8 of 9, 89%). Many of the application essays highlighted a personal loss as driving the interest in a health career with several of those losses based on 'gun violence'. There was under-representation in medicine racial/ethnic or gender concordance for 80% (N=8 of 10) of the mentee-mentor pairings. In the pre-workshop survey, even those students with high-grade point averages and strong academic achievement in science courses indicated low confidence in their ability to succeed. Most students (N=7 of 10, 70%) reported a strong positive connection with their mentor in the post-workshop survey. There was a reduction in self-identified modifiable barriers to success for 83% (N=5 of 6) of the mentees. One-third of students who responded to the 6-month survey indicated that they had issues with maintaining contact with their mentors after the workshop.

Conclusion: The pipeline program was able to reach the target demographic and increase interest in surgery. Positive mentee/mentor relationships were formed. There are improvements to be made in longitudinal components of the program to ensure lasting results.

Level of evidence: III.

回溯过去,展望未来:美国创伤外科协会多元化、公平和包容管道计划。
目标:与医学生的人口统计数据相比,外科人才队伍存在明显差距。输送管道计划已被证明能有效消除差距。美国创伤外科协会多样性、公平性和包容性委员会设计了一项纵向管道计划,由高中生作为被指导者,外科医生作为指导者,提供面对面的实践研讨会:方法:使用总体百分比和地区贫困指数(ADI)确定被指导者的人口统计学特征和申请时的社会经济状况。对项目申请论文进行定性分析,寻找共同主题。对工作坊前、工作坊后和 6 个月的跟踪调查进行分析,以了解被指导者的经验和需要改进的地方:被选中的学员中有 30% 为男性(10 人中有 3 人),70% 为女性(10 人中有 7 人),50% 为黑人或非裔美国人(10 人中有 5 人),30% 为西班牙裔或拉丁裔(10 人中有 3 人)。大多数被指导者都是所在州的最弱势群体(9 人中有 8 人,占 89%)。许多申请论文都强调,个人损失是促使他们对医疗卫生职业产生兴趣的原因,其中有几篇是关于 "枪支暴力 "的。80%(10 人中有 8 人)的导师与辅导员配对中,医学种族/民族或性别一致性方面的代表性不足。在工作坊前的调查中,即使是平均分高、理科成绩优秀的学生也对自己的成功能力信心不足。在工作坊结束后的调查中,大多数学生(10 人中有 7 人,占 70%)都表示与导师建立了非常积极的联系。83%的被指导者(6 人中有 5 人)自我认定的成功障碍有所减少。在为期 6 个月的调查中,三分之一的学生表示,他们在工作坊结束后与导师保持联系时遇到了问题:管道计划能够覆盖目标人群并提高他们对外科手术的兴趣。学员与导师之间建立了积极的关系。该计划的纵向部分有待改进,以确保取得持久成果:证据等级:III.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信