Improving door-to-analgesia timing in musculoskeletal injuries in an academic emergency department in India: a quality improvement project.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Anuusha Sadasivam S, Aswin Kumaran, S Manu Ayyan, S N Sindujaa
{"title":"Improving door-to-analgesia timing in musculoskeletal injuries in an academic emergency department in India: a quality improvement project.","authors":"Anuusha Sadasivam S, Aswin Kumaran, S Manu Ayyan, S N Sindujaa","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pain, more frequently due to musculoskeletal injuries, is a prevalent concern in emergency departments (EDs). Timely analgesic administration is paramount in the acute setting of ED. Despite its importance, many EDs face challenges in pain management and present opportunities for improvement. This initiative aimed to expedite the administration of the first analgesic in patients with musculoskeletal pain in the ED.</p><p><strong>Local problem: </strong>Observations within our ED revealed that patients with musculoskeletal injuries triaged to yellow or green areas experienced prolonged waiting times, leading to delayed analgesic administration, thereby adversely affecting clinical care and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Specific aim: </strong>The aim of our quality improvement (QI) project was to reduce the time to administration of first analgesia by 30% from baseline, in patients with musculoskeletal injuries presenting to our academic ED, in a period of 8 weeks after the baseline phase.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary QI team systematically applied Point-of-Care Quality Improvement and Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle methodologies. Process mapping and fishbone analyses identified the challenges in analgesia administration. Targeted interventions were iteratively refined through PDSA cycles.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Interventions such as pain score documentation at triage, fast-tracking of patients with moderate-to-severe pain, resident awareness sessions, a pain management protocol and prescription audits were executed during the PDSA cycles. Successful elements were reinforced and adjustments were made to address the identified challenges.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median door-to-analgesia timing during the baseline phase was 55.5 min (IQR, 25.75-108 min). During the postintervention phase, the median was significantly reduced to 15 min (IQR, 5-37 min), exceeding the anticipated outcomes and indicating a substantial 73% reduction (p value <0.001) from baseline.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing simple change ideas resulted in a substantial improvement in door-to-analgesia timing within the ED. These findings significantly contribute to ongoing discussions on the optimisation of pain management in emergency care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11163673/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pain, more frequently due to musculoskeletal injuries, is a prevalent concern in emergency departments (EDs). Timely analgesic administration is paramount in the acute setting of ED. Despite its importance, many EDs face challenges in pain management and present opportunities for improvement. This initiative aimed to expedite the administration of the first analgesic in patients with musculoskeletal pain in the ED.

Local problem: Observations within our ED revealed that patients with musculoskeletal injuries triaged to yellow or green areas experienced prolonged waiting times, leading to delayed analgesic administration, thereby adversely affecting clinical care and patient satisfaction.

Specific aim: The aim of our quality improvement (QI) project was to reduce the time to administration of first analgesia by 30% from baseline, in patients with musculoskeletal injuries presenting to our academic ED, in a period of 8 weeks after the baseline phase.

Methods: A multidisciplinary QI team systematically applied Point-of-Care Quality Improvement and Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle methodologies. Process mapping and fishbone analyses identified the challenges in analgesia administration. Targeted interventions were iteratively refined through PDSA cycles.

Interventions: Interventions such as pain score documentation at triage, fast-tracking of patients with moderate-to-severe pain, resident awareness sessions, a pain management protocol and prescription audits were executed during the PDSA cycles. Successful elements were reinforced and adjustments were made to address the identified challenges.

Results: The median door-to-analgesia timing during the baseline phase was 55.5 min (IQR, 25.75-108 min). During the postintervention phase, the median was significantly reduced to 15 min (IQR, 5-37 min), exceeding the anticipated outcomes and indicating a substantial 73% reduction (p value <0.001) from baseline.

Conclusion: Implementing simple change ideas resulted in a substantial improvement in door-to-analgesia timing within the ED. These findings significantly contribute to ongoing discussions on the optimisation of pain management in emergency care.

印度一家学术性急诊科改善肌肉骨骼损伤的 "门到镇痛 "时间:质量改进项目。
导言:疼痛是急诊科(ED)普遍关注的问题,多由肌肉骨骼损伤引起。在急诊室中,及时给予镇痛剂至关重要。尽管镇痛非常重要,但许多急诊室在疼痛管理方面仍面临挑战,并有改进的机会。本地问题:在我们的急诊室观察发现,被分流到黄色或绿色区域的肌肉骨骼损伤患者等待时间过长,导致镇痛药物的使用延迟,从而对临床护理和患者满意度产生了不利影响。具体目标:我们的质量改进(QI)项目的目标是,在基线阶段结束后的 8 周内,将本院急诊室接诊的肌肉骨骼损伤患者的首次镇痛用药时间在基线基础上缩短 30%:方法:一个多学科质量改进小组系统地应用了护理点质量改进和 "计划-实施-研究-行动"(PDSA)循环方法。通过绘制流程图和鱼骨分析,确定了镇痛管理中存在的挑战。通过 PDSA 循环,不断完善有针对性的干预措施:干预措施:在 PDSA 循环期间,实施了分诊疼痛评分记录、中度至重度疼痛患者快速追踪、住院医师认知课程、疼痛管理协议和处方审核等干预措施。成功的要素得到了巩固,并针对发现的挑战进行了调整:结果:在基线阶段,门到镇痛时间的中位数为 55.5 分钟(IQR,25.75-108 分钟)。通过实施简单的变革理念,急诊室从门诊到镇痛的时间大大缩短。这些研究结果对当前有关优化急诊疼痛管理的讨论具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信