Assessing the myth of disaster risk reduction in the wake of catastrophic floods

Daniel Nohrstedt, Elena Mondino, Giuliano Di Baldassarre, Charles F. Parker
{"title":"Assessing the myth of disaster risk reduction in the wake of catastrophic floods","authors":"Daniel Nohrstedt, Elena Mondino, Giuliano Di Baldassarre, Charles F. Parker","doi":"10.1038/s44304-024-00007-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Whether disasters serve as focusing events leading to measures that reduce future disaster risks is contested. Here, we study flood disasters in 23 of the world’s most flood-prone countries to assess whether catastrophic floods, those milestone events with the highest fatalities, have been followed by decreasing mortality in subsequent floods. Results from a trend analysis, controlling for flood magnitude and subtypes, find that reductions in mortality rates have rarely followed the most devastating floods.","PeriodicalId":501712,"journal":{"name":"npj Natural Hazards","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44304-024-00007-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj Natural Hazards","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44304-024-00007-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Whether disasters serve as focusing events leading to measures that reduce future disaster risks is contested. Here, we study flood disasters in 23 of the world’s most flood-prone countries to assess whether catastrophic floods, those milestone events with the highest fatalities, have been followed by decreasing mortality in subsequent floods. Results from a trend analysis, controlling for flood magnitude and subtypes, find that reductions in mortality rates have rarely followed the most devastating floods.

Abstract Image

评估灾难性洪灾后减少灾害风险的神话
灾害是否会成为导致采取措施降低未来灾害风险的焦点事件,这一点还存在争议。在此,我们研究了世界上最容易发生洪灾的 23 个国家的洪灾情况,以评估灾难性洪灾(即死亡率最高的里程碑事件)是否会导致后续洪灾的死亡率下降。趋势分析结果表明,在控制洪水规模和子类的情况下,死亡率的降低很少发生在最具破坏性的洪水之后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信