Seeking common ground: A pluralistic valuation of rangeland ecosystem services

Rangelands Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rala.2024.03.003

Anna Clare Monlezun , Kelly W. Jones , Ryan Rhoades , Stacy J. Lynn

{"title":"Seeking common ground: A pluralistic valuation of rangeland ecosystem services","authors":"Anna Clare Monlezun , Kelly W. Jones , Ryan Rhoades , Stacy J. Lynn","doi":"10.1016/j.rala.2024.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><ul><li>•The concepts of ecosystem services and nature's contributions to people highlight linkages between people and nature, directly addressing relationships and the flow of values.</li><li>•Understanding stakeholder values in specific collaborative contexts may aid in solution-focused approaches, minimizing tradeoffs, improved group cohesion, and partnership success, as rangeland managers attempt to match strategies to needs of landscapes and people.</li><li>•Using a mixed-methods approach, we explored pluralistic, sociocultural values and perspectives of diverse stakeholders regarding rangeland ecosystem services.</li><li>•We noted patterns in how stakeholder groups prioritized certain ecosystem services over others and how this prioritization is a reflection of unique yet overlapping values systems.</li><li>•Sustainable rangeland management is about the ecological underpinnings of a place and also about supporting the people and communities who have direct relationships with those landscapes.</li></ul></div>","PeriodicalId":101057,"journal":{"name":"Rangelands","volume":"46 3","pages":"Pages 72-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190052824000129/pdfft?md5=c10d7787465d8d6d5090874c040ed416&pid=1-s2.0-S0190052824000129-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rangelands","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190052824000129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

•
The concepts of ecosystem services and nature's contributions to people highlight linkages between people and nature, directly addressing relationships and the flow of values.
•
Understanding stakeholder values in specific collaborative contexts may aid in solution-focused approaches, minimizing tradeoffs, improved group cohesion, and partnership success, as rangeland managers attempt to match strategies to needs of landscapes and people.
•
Using a mixed-methods approach, we explored pluralistic, sociocultural values and perspectives of diverse stakeholders regarding rangeland ecosystem services.
•
We noted patterns in how stakeholder groups prioritized certain ecosystem services over others and how this prioritization is a reflection of unique yet overlapping values systems.
•
Sustainable rangeland management is about the ecological underpinnings of a place and also about supporting the people and communities who have direct relationships with those landscapes.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求同存异：牧场生态系统服务的多元估值

-生态系统服务和大自然对人类贡献的概念强调了人与自然之间的联系，直接解决了关系和价值流的问题。在具体的合作背景下，了解利益相关者的价值观可能有助于采取以解决方案为中心的方法，最大限度地减少权衡，提高团体凝聚力，并在合作中取得成功，因为牧场管理者试图将战略与景观和人类的需求相匹配。-我们注意到利益相关者群体将某些生态系统服务置于其他服务之上的模式，以及这种优先排序如何反映了独特而又重叠的价值体系。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Rangelands

CiteScore

4.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量