{"title":"Using an evaluative lens to characterize the implementation outcomes of an NDBI within an early intervention system","authors":"Katherine Pickard , Nailah Islam , Brooke Demitri , Nicole Hendrix , Hannah Davies , Millena Yohannes , Ainsley Buck , Ellen Doernberg , Jocelyn Kuhn","doi":"10.1016/j.ecresq.2024.05.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A growing number of research studies are attempting to increase access to naturalistic developmental behavioral interventions (NDBIs) for autistic toddlers and their families by translating these approaches into Part C Early Intervention systems. As efforts to increase the use of NDBIs across EI systems grow, it is important to expand the scope of research to evaluate the implementation impact of this work. In order to address this gap, the current study was grounded in the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework (RE-AIM) to evaluate a broader range of implementation outcomes when a parent-mediated NDBI, Project ImPACT, was implemented within an Early Intervention system. Specific aims included examining: 1) the reach of Project ImPACT to children across the system; 2) the perceived effectiveness of Project ImPACT; 3) rates of provider participation in Project ImPACT training and consultation; 4) the delivery and adaptation of Project ImPACT by Early Intervention providers; and 5) providers’ intent to sustain their use of Project ImPACT. Forty-eight Early Intervention providers enrolled in Project ImPACT training, with a subsample participating in ongoing group consultation followed by an exit interview and a 6-month follow-up survey. Although there was a high level of interest in Project ImPACT training and good retention once enrolled, only half of EI providers who expressed interest in Project ImPACT training ultimately enrolled. Participating providers delivered Project ImPACT to families and children who were representative of state-level demographic information and perceived that Project ImPACT was effective for families and children on their caseload irrespective of whether children were autistic. Consistent with other research studies, providers’ fidelity to Project ImPACT was inconsistent, and providers reported a moderate level of adaptation to the program. At 6-month follow-up, providers reported high maintenance of Project ImPACT. The findings from this study have implications for how the RE-AIM framework could be used to more concisely characterize the impact of implementation efforts within public systems serving autistic toddlers and their families.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48348,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","volume":"68 ","pages":"Pages 225-234"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200624000620","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A growing number of research studies are attempting to increase access to naturalistic developmental behavioral interventions (NDBIs) for autistic toddlers and their families by translating these approaches into Part C Early Intervention systems. As efforts to increase the use of NDBIs across EI systems grow, it is important to expand the scope of research to evaluate the implementation impact of this work. In order to address this gap, the current study was grounded in the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework (RE-AIM) to evaluate a broader range of implementation outcomes when a parent-mediated NDBI, Project ImPACT, was implemented within an Early Intervention system. Specific aims included examining: 1) the reach of Project ImPACT to children across the system; 2) the perceived effectiveness of Project ImPACT; 3) rates of provider participation in Project ImPACT training and consultation; 4) the delivery and adaptation of Project ImPACT by Early Intervention providers; and 5) providers’ intent to sustain their use of Project ImPACT. Forty-eight Early Intervention providers enrolled in Project ImPACT training, with a subsample participating in ongoing group consultation followed by an exit interview and a 6-month follow-up survey. Although there was a high level of interest in Project ImPACT training and good retention once enrolled, only half of EI providers who expressed interest in Project ImPACT training ultimately enrolled. Participating providers delivered Project ImPACT to families and children who were representative of state-level demographic information and perceived that Project ImPACT was effective for families and children on their caseload irrespective of whether children were autistic. Consistent with other research studies, providers’ fidelity to Project ImPACT was inconsistent, and providers reported a moderate level of adaptation to the program. At 6-month follow-up, providers reported high maintenance of Project ImPACT. The findings from this study have implications for how the RE-AIM framework could be used to more concisely characterize the impact of implementation efforts within public systems serving autistic toddlers and their families.
期刊介绍:
For over twenty years, Early Childhood Research Quarterly (ECRQ) has influenced the field of early childhood education and development through the publication of empirical research that meets the highest standards of scholarly and practical significance. ECRQ publishes predominantly empirical research (quantitative or qualitative methods) on issues of interest to early childhood development, theory, and educational practice (Birth through 8 years of age). The journal also occasionally publishes practitioner and/or policy perspectives, book reviews, and significant reviews of research. As an applied journal, we are interested in work that has social, policy, and educational relevance and implications and work that strengthens links between research and practice.