Andreas Renner , Ingo Gulyas , Martin Buschmann , Gerd Heilemann , Barbara Knäusl , Martin Heilmann , Joachim Widder , Dietmar Georg , Petra Trnková
{"title":"Explicitly encoding the cyclic nature of breathing signal allows for accurate breathing motion prediction in radiotherapy with minimal training data","authors":"Andreas Renner , Ingo Gulyas , Martin Buschmann , Gerd Heilemann , Barbara Knäusl , Martin Heilmann , Joachim Widder , Dietmar Georg , Petra Trnková","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Active breathing motion management in radiotherapy consists of motion monitoring, quantification and mitigation. It is impacted by associated latencies of a few 100 ms. Artificial neural networks can successfully predict breathing motion and eliminate latencies. However, they require usually a large dataset for training. The objective of this work was to demonstrate that explicitly encoding the cyclic nature of the breathing signal into the training data enables significant reduction of training datasets which can be obtained from healthy volunteers.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Seventy surface scanner breathing signals from 25 healthy volunteers in anterior-posterior direction were used for training and validation (ratio 4:1) of long short-term memory models. The model performance was compared to a model using decomposition into phase, amplitude and a time-dependent baseline. Testing of the models was performed on 55 independent breathing signals in anterior-posterior direction from surface scanner (35 lung, 20 liver) of 30 patients with a mean breathing amplitude of (5.9 ± 6.7)<!--> <!-->mm.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Using the decomposed breathing signal allowed for a reduction of the absolute root-mean square error (RMSE) from 0.34 mm to 0.12 mm during validation. Testing using patient data yielded an average absolute RMSE of the breathing signal of (0.16 ± 0.11)<!--> <!-->mm with a prediction horizon of 500 ms.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>It was demonstrated that a motion prediction model can be trained with less than 100 datasets of healthy volunteers if breathing cycle parameters are considered. Applied to 55 patients, the model predicted breathing motion with a high accuracy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000642/pdfft?md5=11454d87d05403c0a30c0d3df553dcde&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624000642-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and purpose
Active breathing motion management in radiotherapy consists of motion monitoring, quantification and mitigation. It is impacted by associated latencies of a few 100 ms. Artificial neural networks can successfully predict breathing motion and eliminate latencies. However, they require usually a large dataset for training. The objective of this work was to demonstrate that explicitly encoding the cyclic nature of the breathing signal into the training data enables significant reduction of training datasets which can be obtained from healthy volunteers.
Material and methods
Seventy surface scanner breathing signals from 25 healthy volunteers in anterior-posterior direction were used for training and validation (ratio 4:1) of long short-term memory models. The model performance was compared to a model using decomposition into phase, amplitude and a time-dependent baseline. Testing of the models was performed on 55 independent breathing signals in anterior-posterior direction from surface scanner (35 lung, 20 liver) of 30 patients with a mean breathing amplitude of (5.9 ± 6.7) mm.
Results
Using the decomposed breathing signal allowed for a reduction of the absolute root-mean square error (RMSE) from 0.34 mm to 0.12 mm during validation. Testing using patient data yielded an average absolute RMSE of the breathing signal of (0.16 ± 0.11) mm with a prediction horizon of 500 ms.
Conclusion
It was demonstrated that a motion prediction model can be trained with less than 100 datasets of healthy volunteers if breathing cycle parameters are considered. Applied to 55 patients, the model predicted breathing motion with a high accuracy.