Ana Catarine Tavares da Silva , Danilo Harudy Kamonseki , Luênia Maria Vasconcelos de Azevedo , Janaynna Nunes de Araújo , Geraldo Carvalho Magalhães , Valéria Mayaly Alves de Oliveira
{"title":"Effect of percutaneous electrolysis on pain and disability in individuals with tendinopathy: Systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Ana Catarine Tavares da Silva , Danilo Harudy Kamonseki , Luênia Maria Vasconcelos de Azevedo , Janaynna Nunes de Araújo , Geraldo Carvalho Magalhães , Valéria Mayaly Alves de Oliveira","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.05.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the effects of Percutaneous Electrolysis (PE) on pain and disability in individuals with tendinopathy.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Systematic Review with Meta-analysis. Databases Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, BVS, and PEDro were researched. Randomized controlled trials assessing PE's effect on pain intensity and disability in tendinopathies were included. The Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 2) was used to assess the risk of bias, and GRADE was used for evaluating the quality of evidence. Mean difference (MD) and standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to determine the effects of PE on pain and disability.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seven studies were included with pooled sample of 282 individuals. PE associated with other interventions was superior to other interventions in reducing pain intensity at short-term (MD = −1.22; CI = −2.07 to −0.86) and intermediate term (MD = −1.35; CI = −2.20 to −0.51). PE associated with other interventions was superior to other interventions in improving disability at short-term (SMD = −0.69; CI = −1.29 to −0.09) but not at intermediate term (SMD = −0.71; CI = −1.79 to 0.36).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Evidence from very low to low quality, suggests that incorporating PE with other interventions reduces pain in the short and medium term. There is evidence of very low-quality suggesting PE interventions in improving disability in the short-term.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224003097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To assess the effects of Percutaneous Electrolysis (PE) on pain and disability in individuals with tendinopathy.
Design
Systematic Review with Meta-analysis. Databases Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, BVS, and PEDro were researched. Randomized controlled trials assessing PE's effect on pain intensity and disability in tendinopathies were included. The Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 2) was used to assess the risk of bias, and GRADE was used for evaluating the quality of evidence. Mean difference (MD) and standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to determine the effects of PE on pain and disability.
Results
Seven studies were included with pooled sample of 282 individuals. PE associated with other interventions was superior to other interventions in reducing pain intensity at short-term (MD = −1.22; CI = −2.07 to −0.86) and intermediate term (MD = −1.35; CI = −2.20 to −0.51). PE associated with other interventions was superior to other interventions in improving disability at short-term (SMD = −0.69; CI = −1.29 to −0.09) but not at intermediate term (SMD = −0.71; CI = −1.79 to 0.36).
Conclusions
Evidence from very low to low quality, suggests that incorporating PE with other interventions reduces pain in the short and medium term. There is evidence of very low-quality suggesting PE interventions in improving disability in the short-term.
目的评估经皮电解术(PE)对肌腱病患者疼痛和残疾的影响。研究数据库包括 Medline、EMBASE、CINAHL、CENTRAL、BVS 和 PEDro。纳入了评估 PE 对肌腱病疼痛强度和残疾影响的随机对照试验。科克伦偏倚风险工具(RoB 2)用于评估偏倚风险,GRADE用于评估证据质量。通过计算平均差(MD)和标准化平均差(SMD)以及 95% 的置信区间(CI)来确定 PE 对疼痛和残疾的影响。在短期(MD = -1.22; CI = -2.07 to -0.86)和中期(MD = -1.35; CI = -2.20 to -0.51)降低疼痛强度方面,与其他干预措施相结合的PE优于其他干预措施。与其他干预措施相结合的PE在改善短期残疾方面优于其他干预措施(SMD = -0.69;CI = -1.29 to -0.09),但在中期残疾方面则不尽相同(SMD = -0.71;CI = -1.79 to 0.36)。有极低质量的证据表明,PE干预可在短期内改善残疾状况。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina