Evolution of Tracheobronchial Colonization Following Tracheal Intubation in Patients With Neurologic Injury Who Are Ventilated

Estelle Danche MD , Sylvain Meyer PharmD , Elie Guichard MSc , Ana Catalina Hernandez Padilla MD, PhD , Anne-Laure Fedou MD , Philippe Vignon MD, PhD , Olivier Barraud PharmD, PhD , Bruno François MD
{"title":"Evolution of Tracheobronchial Colonization Following Tracheal Intubation in Patients With Neurologic Injury Who Are Ventilated","authors":"Estelle Danche MD ,&nbsp;Sylvain Meyer PharmD ,&nbsp;Elie Guichard MSc ,&nbsp;Ana Catalina Hernandez Padilla MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Anne-Laure Fedou MD ,&nbsp;Philippe Vignon MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Olivier Barraud PharmD, PhD ,&nbsp;Bruno François MD","doi":"10.1016/j.chstcc.2024.100075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The characteristics and course of endotracheal secretions have scarcely been studied in patients under mechanical ventilation (MV) at risk of developing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).</p></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><p>Can endotracheal secretions be exhaustively described and what is their predictive value for the diagnosis of VAP during MV?</p></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><p>This single-center prospective study included neuro-injured patients with neurologic injury requiring MV for at least 7 days. Patients with pulmonary and infectious diseases were ineligible. All endotracheal aspirates (ETAs) collected between tracheal intubation and day 7 were analyzed. Macroscopic characteristics and microbiology were assessed. Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score was calculated daily. An anonymized adjudication committee validated all VAP events.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty-eight patients and 1,544 ETAs were analyzed. Overall, 81% of the ETAs were purulent, and 50% were thick. Culture results showed high interindividual and intraindividual variability. Ten patients (21%) developed early-onset VAP. Eight patients (80%) with VAP and 14 (37%) without VAP had a Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score &gt; 6. The day prior to VAP diagnosis, a 20 mL increase in ETA volume detected VAP with a sensitivity of 67% and a specificity of 93%.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>This study provides new information regarding the course of respiratory colonization in patients who are mechanically ventilated and suggests that ETA color/aspects and pathogen kinetics cannot predict VAP. Traditional VAP criteria (Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score and bacterial load) also had a low diagnostic specificity. Conversely, an increase in secretion volume should alert for VAP development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93934,"journal":{"name":"CHEST critical care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949788424000297/pdfft?md5=f8a9d2a3710d2e4c53d03e8fb17494de&pid=1-s2.0-S2949788424000297-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST critical care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949788424000297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The characteristics and course of endotracheal secretions have scarcely been studied in patients under mechanical ventilation (MV) at risk of developing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

Research Question

Can endotracheal secretions be exhaustively described and what is their predictive value for the diagnosis of VAP during MV?

Study Design and Methods

This single-center prospective study included neuro-injured patients with neurologic injury requiring MV for at least 7 days. Patients with pulmonary and infectious diseases were ineligible. All endotracheal aspirates (ETAs) collected between tracheal intubation and day 7 were analyzed. Macroscopic characteristics and microbiology were assessed. Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score was calculated daily. An anonymized adjudication committee validated all VAP events.

Results

Forty-eight patients and 1,544 ETAs were analyzed. Overall, 81% of the ETAs were purulent, and 50% were thick. Culture results showed high interindividual and intraindividual variability. Ten patients (21%) developed early-onset VAP. Eight patients (80%) with VAP and 14 (37%) without VAP had a Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score > 6. The day prior to VAP diagnosis, a 20 mL increase in ETA volume detected VAP with a sensitivity of 67% and a specificity of 93%.

Interpretation

This study provides new information regarding the course of respiratory colonization in patients who are mechanically ventilated and suggests that ETA color/aspects and pathogen kinetics cannot predict VAP. Traditional VAP criteria (Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score and bacterial load) also had a low diagnostic specificity. Conversely, an increase in secretion volume should alert for VAP development.

通气的神经损伤患者气管插管后气管支气管菌落的演变
研究背景对于有可能患呼吸机相关肺炎(VAP)的机械通气(MV)患者,气管内分泌物的特征和过程很少有人研究。研究问题能否详尽描述气管内分泌物,它们对 MV 期间 VAP 诊断的预测价值如何?患有肺部疾病和感染性疾病的患者不符合条件。分析了从气管插管到第 7 天期间收集的所有气管内吸痰液 (ETA)。对宏观特征和微生物学进行了评估。每天计算临床肺部感染评分。一个匿名评审委员会对所有 VAP 事件进行了验证。总体而言,81% 的 ETA 为化脓性,50% 为粘稠性。培养结果显示个体间和个体内差异很大。十名患者(21%)出现了早发性 VAP。在确诊 VAP 的前一天,ETA 量增加 20 毫升可检测出 VAP,灵敏度为 67%,特异度为 93%。这项研究提供了有关机械通气患者呼吸道定植过程的新信息,并表明 ETA 颜色/外观和病原体动力学不能预测 VAP。传统的 VAP 标准(临床肺部感染评分和细菌量)的诊断特异性也很低。相反,分泌量增加应警惕 VAP 的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CHEST critical care
CHEST critical care Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信