The Neurocritical Care Examination and Workup.

Q1 Medicine
Sarah Wahlster, Nicholas J Johnson
{"title":"The Neurocritical Care Examination and Workup.","authors":"Sarah Wahlster, Nicholas J Johnson","doi":"10.1212/CON.0000000000001438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This article provides an overview of the evaluation of patients in neurocritical care settings and a structured approach to recognizing and localizing acute neurologic emergencies, performing a focused examination, and pursuing workup to identify critical findings requiring urgent management.</p><p><strong>Latest developments: </strong>After identifying and stabilizing imminent threats to survival, including respiratory and hemodynamic compromise, the initial differential diagnosis for patients in neurocritical care is built on a focused history and clinical examination, always keeping in mind critical \"must-not-miss\" pathologies. A key priority is to identify processes warranting time-sensitive therapeutic interventions, including signs of elevated intracranial pressure and herniation, acute neurovascular emergencies, clinical or subclinical seizures, infections of the central nervous system, spinal cord compression, and acute neuromuscular respiratory failure. Prompt neuroimaging to identify structural abnormalities should be obtained, complemented by laboratory findings to assess for underlying systemic causes. The indication for EEG and lumbar puncture should be considered early based on clinical suspicion.</p><p><strong>Essential points: </strong>In neurocritical care, the initial evaluation is often fast paced, requiring assessment and management to happen in parallel. History, clinical examination, and workup should be obtained while considering therapeutic implications and the need for lifesaving interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":52475,"journal":{"name":"CONTINUUM Lifelong Learning in Neurology","volume":"30 3","pages":"556-587"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CONTINUUM Lifelong Learning in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/CON.0000000000001438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This article provides an overview of the evaluation of patients in neurocritical care settings and a structured approach to recognizing and localizing acute neurologic emergencies, performing a focused examination, and pursuing workup to identify critical findings requiring urgent management.

Latest developments: After identifying and stabilizing imminent threats to survival, including respiratory and hemodynamic compromise, the initial differential diagnosis for patients in neurocritical care is built on a focused history and clinical examination, always keeping in mind critical "must-not-miss" pathologies. A key priority is to identify processes warranting time-sensitive therapeutic interventions, including signs of elevated intracranial pressure and herniation, acute neurovascular emergencies, clinical or subclinical seizures, infections of the central nervous system, spinal cord compression, and acute neuromuscular respiratory failure. Prompt neuroimaging to identify structural abnormalities should be obtained, complemented by laboratory findings to assess for underlying systemic causes. The indication for EEG and lumbar puncture should be considered early based on clinical suspicion.

Essential points: In neurocritical care, the initial evaluation is often fast paced, requiring assessment and management to happen in parallel. History, clinical examination, and workup should be obtained while considering therapeutic implications and the need for lifesaving interventions.

神经重症监护检查和评估。
目的:本文概述了在神经重症监护环境下对患者进行评估的方法,以及识别和定位急性神经系统急症、进行重点检查和继续检查以确定需要紧急处理的关键结果的结构化方法:在确定并稳定了呼吸和血液动力学损害等迫在眉睫的生存威胁后,神经重症监护患者的初步鉴别诊断应建立在重点病史和临床检查的基础上,并始终牢记 "不可忽视 "的关键病理。当务之急是确定需要及时采取治疗干预措施的过程,包括颅内压升高和疝的迹象、急性神经血管急症、临床或亚临床癫痫发作、中枢神经系统感染、脊髓压迫和急性神经肌肉呼吸衰竭。应及时进行神经影像学检查以确定结构异常,并辅以实验室检查结果以评估潜在的全身性病因。应根据临床怀疑及早考虑脑电图和腰椎穿刺的指征:在神经重症监护中,初步评估通常节奏很快,需要同时进行评估和管理。在了解病史、临床检查和检查结果的同时,还应考虑治疗意义和挽救生命的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
175
期刊介绍: Continue your professional development on your own schedule with Continuum: Lifelong Learning in Neurology®, the American Academy of Neurology" self-study continuing medical education publication. Six times a year you"ll learn from neurology"s experts in a convenient format for home or office. Each issue includes diagnostic and treatment outlines, clinical case studies, a topic-relevant ethics case, detailed patient management problem, and a multiple-choice self-assessment examination.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信