Use of patent term extensions to restore regulatory time for medical devices in the United States.

C Benson Kuo, Frances Richmond
{"title":"Use of patent term extensions to restore regulatory time for medical devices in the United States.","authors":"C Benson Kuo, Frances Richmond","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2363298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical devices can seek patent term extensions (PTEs), which extend market exclusivity to compensate for delays related to clinical trials and regulatory review. Pharmaceutical companies commonly use PTEs, but their use by medical device companies has not been clear.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We examined the use of PTEs by medical device companies between 1984 and 2024 using a database published in the Federal Register and a list published by the Patent and Trademark Office.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 178 medical device submissions were linked to a PTE application. They were mostly concentrated in 116 product codes associated with 15 medical specialties; nearly half were associated with cardiovascular devices. Numbers increased significantly in the past decade. Successful applications restored 987 days on average.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The patent restoration opportunity appears underutilized. It is unclear whether some companies do not recognize the opportunity it promises, or whether it does not meet their needs. Different business features and marketing strategies in device versus pharmaceutical industries may decrease the usefulness of the PTE program for these types of medical products. However, the finding that a small subset of manufacturers operating in competitive markets adopted patent extension strategies more commonly suggests a significant competitive advantage when competition increases.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of medical devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2024.2363298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medical devices can seek patent term extensions (PTEs), which extend market exclusivity to compensate for delays related to clinical trials and regulatory review. Pharmaceutical companies commonly use PTEs, but their use by medical device companies has not been clear.

Research design and methods: We examined the use of PTEs by medical device companies between 1984 and 2024 using a database published in the Federal Register and a list published by the Patent and Trademark Office.

Results: Only 178 medical device submissions were linked to a PTE application. They were mostly concentrated in 116 product codes associated with 15 medical specialties; nearly half were associated with cardiovascular devices. Numbers increased significantly in the past decade. Successful applications restored 987 days on average.

Conclusions: The patent restoration opportunity appears underutilized. It is unclear whether some companies do not recognize the opportunity it promises, or whether it does not meet their needs. Different business features and marketing strategies in device versus pharmaceutical industries may decrease the usefulness of the PTE program for these types of medical products. However, the finding that a small subset of manufacturers operating in competitive markets adopted patent extension strategies more commonly suggests a significant competitive advantage when competition increases.

利用专利期延长恢复美国医疗器械的监管时间。
背景:医疗器械可以申请专利期限延长(PTE),以延长市场独占期,弥补临床试验和监管审查的延误。制药公司通常使用 PTE,但医疗器械公司使用 PTE 的情况尚不明确:我们利用《联邦公报》公布的数据库和专利商标局公布的清单,研究了 1984 年至 2024 年期间医疗器械公司使用 PTE 的情况:结果:只有 178 项医疗器械申请与 PTE 申请相关联。它们主要集中在与 15 个医学专业相关的 116 个产品代码中;近一半与心血管设备有关。这一数字在过去十年中大幅增加。成功的申请平均恢复了 987 天:专利恢复的机会似乎没有得到充分利用。目前还不清楚是一些公司没有意识到这一机会,还是这一机会不能满足他们的需求。设备行业与制药行业的业务特点和营销策略不同,可能会降低 PTE 计划对这些类型医疗产品的实用性。不过,在竞争激烈的市场中,一小部分制造商更普遍地采用专利延伸策略,这一发现表明,当竞争加剧时,他们会拥有显著的竞争优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信