National Implementation of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Virtual Dietitian for Patients With Cancer.

IF 3.3 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Marissa L Buchan, Keshav Goel, Chelsey K Schneider, Vera Steullet, Susan Bratton, Ethan Basch
{"title":"National Implementation of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Virtual Dietitian for Patients With Cancer.","authors":"Marissa L Buchan, Keshav Goel, Chelsey K Schneider, Vera Steullet, Susan Bratton, Ethan Basch","doi":"10.1200/CCI.24.00085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Nutritional status is an established driver of cancer outcomes, but there is an insufficient workforce of registered dietitians to meet patient needs for nutritional counseling. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) afford the opportunity to expand access to guideline-based nutritional support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An AI-based nutrition assistant called Ina was developed on the basis of a learning data set of >100,000 expert-curated interventions, peer-reviewed literature, and clinical guidelines, and provides a conversational text message-based patient interface to guide dietary habits and answer questions. Ina was implemented nationally in partnership with 25 advocacy organizations. Data on demographics, patient-reported outcomes, and utilization were systematically collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between July 2019 and August 2023, 3,310 users from all 50 states registered to use Ina. Users were 73% female; median age was 57 (range, 18-91) years; most common cancer types were genitourinary (22%), breast (21%), gynecologic (19%), GI (14%), and lung (12%). Users were medically complex, with 50% reporting Stage III to IV disease, 37% with metastases, and 50% with 2+ chronic conditions. Nutritional challenges were highly prevalent: 58% had overweight/obese BMIs, 83% reported barriers to good nutrition, and 42% had food allergies/intolerances. Levels of engagement were high: 68% texted questions to Ina; 79% completed surveys; median user retention was 8.8 months; 94% were satisfied with the platform; and 98% found the guidance helpful. In an evaluation of outcomes, 84% used the advice to guide diet; 47% used recommended recipes, 82% felt the program improved quality of life (QoL), and 88% reported improved symptom management.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of an evidence-based AI virtual dietitian is feasible and is reported by patients to be beneficial on diet, QoL, and symptom management. Ongoing evaluations are assessing impact on other outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51626,"journal":{"name":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI.24.00085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Nutritional status is an established driver of cancer outcomes, but there is an insufficient workforce of registered dietitians to meet patient needs for nutritional counseling. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) afford the opportunity to expand access to guideline-based nutritional support.

Methods: An AI-based nutrition assistant called Ina was developed on the basis of a learning data set of >100,000 expert-curated interventions, peer-reviewed literature, and clinical guidelines, and provides a conversational text message-based patient interface to guide dietary habits and answer questions. Ina was implemented nationally in partnership with 25 advocacy organizations. Data on demographics, patient-reported outcomes, and utilization were systematically collected.

Results: Between July 2019 and August 2023, 3,310 users from all 50 states registered to use Ina. Users were 73% female; median age was 57 (range, 18-91) years; most common cancer types were genitourinary (22%), breast (21%), gynecologic (19%), GI (14%), and lung (12%). Users were medically complex, with 50% reporting Stage III to IV disease, 37% with metastases, and 50% with 2+ chronic conditions. Nutritional challenges were highly prevalent: 58% had overweight/obese BMIs, 83% reported barriers to good nutrition, and 42% had food allergies/intolerances. Levels of engagement were high: 68% texted questions to Ina; 79% completed surveys; median user retention was 8.8 months; 94% were satisfied with the platform; and 98% found the guidance helpful. In an evaluation of outcomes, 84% used the advice to guide diet; 47% used recommended recipes, 82% felt the program improved quality of life (QoL), and 88% reported improved symptom management.

Conclusion: Implementation of an evidence-based AI virtual dietitian is feasible and is reported by patients to be beneficial on diet, QoL, and symptom management. Ongoing evaluations are assessing impact on other outcomes.

在全国范围内为癌症患者实施基于人工智能的虚拟营养师。
目的:营养状况是癌症预后的既定驱动因素,但注册营养师队伍不足,无法满足患者对营养咨询的需求。人工智能(AI)和机器学习(ML)为扩大基于指南的营养支持提供了机会:人工智能营养助手Ina的开发基于一个学习数据集,该数据集包含超过100,000项专家推荐的干预措施、同行评议文献和临床指南,并提供了一个基于文本消息的对话式患者界面,以指导饮食习惯并回答问题。Ina 与 25 个宣传机构合作在全国范围内实施。系统收集了有关人口统计学、患者报告结果和使用情况的数据:从 2019 年 7 月到 2023 年 8 月,来自美国 50 个州的 3310 名用户注册使用了 Ina。73%的用户为女性;中位年龄为57岁(18-91岁);最常见的癌症类型为泌尿生殖系统癌症(22%)、乳腺癌(21%)、妇科癌症(19%)、消化道癌症(14%)和肺癌(12%)。使用者的病情复杂,50%的人报告了 III 至 IV 期疾病,37%的人有转移,50%的人有 2 种以上慢性病。营养方面的挑战非常普遍:58%的人体重指数超重/肥胖,83%的人表示存在营养障碍,42%的人对食物过敏/不耐受。参与度很高:68%的人向伊娜发短信提问;79%的人完成了调查;用户保留时间中位数为 8.8 个月;94% 的人对平台表示满意;98% 的人认为指导很有帮助。在结果评估中,84%的人使用建议指导饮食;47%的人使用推荐食谱;82%的人认为该计划提高了生活质量(QoL);88%的人报告症状管理有所改善:结论:实施循证人工智能虚拟营养师计划是可行的,患者认为该计划有利于饮食、生活质量和症状控制。正在进行的评估正在评估对其他结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
190
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信