Engaging Antiracist And Decolonial Praxis To Advance Equity In Oregon Public Health Surveillance Practices.

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ryan J Petteway, Daniel López-Cevallos, Mira Mohsini, Andres Lopez, Roberta S Hunte, Tim Holbert, Kusuma Madamala
{"title":"Engaging Antiracist And Decolonial Praxis To Advance Equity In Oregon Public Health Surveillance Practices.","authors":"Ryan J Petteway, Daniel López-Cevallos, Mira Mohsini, Andres Lopez, Roberta S Hunte, Tim Holbert, Kusuma Madamala","doi":"10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Public health surveillance and data systems in the US remain an unnamed facet of structural racism. What gets measured, which data get collected and analyzed, and how and by whom are not matters of happenstance. Rather, surveillance and data systems are productions and reproductions of political priority, epistemic privilege, and racialized state power. This has consequences for how communities of color are represented or misrepresented, viewed, and valued and for what is prioritized and viewed as legitimate cause for action. Surveillance and data systems accordingly must be understood as both an instrument of structural racism and an opportunity to dismantle it. Here, we outline a critique of standard surveillance systems and practice, drawing from the social epidemiology, critical theory, and decolonial theory literatures to illuminate matters of power germane to epistemic and procedural justice in the surveillance of communities of color. We then summarize how community partners, academics, and state health department data scientists collaborated to reimagine survey practices in Oregon, engaging public health critical race praxis and decolonial theory to reorient toward antiracist surveillance systems. We close with a brief discussion of implications for practice and areas for continued consideration and reflection.</p>","PeriodicalId":50411,"journal":{"name":"Health Affairs","volume":"43 6","pages":"813-821"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00051","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Public health surveillance and data systems in the US remain an unnamed facet of structural racism. What gets measured, which data get collected and analyzed, and how and by whom are not matters of happenstance. Rather, surveillance and data systems are productions and reproductions of political priority, epistemic privilege, and racialized state power. This has consequences for how communities of color are represented or misrepresented, viewed, and valued and for what is prioritized and viewed as legitimate cause for action. Surveillance and data systems accordingly must be understood as both an instrument of structural racism and an opportunity to dismantle it. Here, we outline a critique of standard surveillance systems and practice, drawing from the social epidemiology, critical theory, and decolonial theory literatures to illuminate matters of power germane to epistemic and procedural justice in the surveillance of communities of color. We then summarize how community partners, academics, and state health department data scientists collaborated to reimagine survey practices in Oregon, engaging public health critical race praxis and decolonial theory to reorient toward antiracist surveillance systems. We close with a brief discussion of implications for practice and areas for continued consideration and reflection.

参与反种族主义和非殖民化实践,促进俄勒冈州公共卫生监测实践的公平性。
美国的公共卫生监测和数据系统仍然是结构性种族主义的一个不为人知的方面。测量什么、收集和分析哪些数据、如何测量以及由谁测量,这些都不是偶然事件。相反,监控和数据系统是政治优先权、认识论特权和种族化国家权力的产物和再现。这对有色人种社区如何被代表或错误地代表、看待和重视,以及对什么被优先考虑和被视为合法的行动理由都有影响。因此,必须将监控和数据系统既理解为结构性种族主义的工具,又理解为消除结构性种族主义的机会。在此,我们借鉴社会流行病学、批判理论和非殖民化理论,概述了对标准监控系统和实践的批判,以阐明在对有色人种社区进行监控时,与认识论和程序正义相关的权力问题。然后,我们总结了社区合作伙伴、学者和州卫生部门的数据科学家是如何合作重新构想俄勒冈州的调查实践的,如何将公共卫生的种族批判实践和非殖民化理论运用到反种族主义的监控系统中。最后,我们简要讨论了对实践的影响以及需要继续考虑和反思的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Affairs
Health Affairs 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
2.10%
发文量
246
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Affairs is a prestigious journal that aims to thoroughly examine significant health policy matters both domestically and globally. Our publication is committed to addressing issues that are relevant to both the private and public sectors. We are enthusiastic about inviting private and public decision-makers to contribute their innovative ideas in a publishable format. Health Affairs seeks to incorporate various perspectives from industry, labor, government, and academia, ensuring that our readers benefit from the diverse viewpoints within the healthcare field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信