Clinical complexity of an Italian cardiovascular intensive care unit: the role of mortality and severity risk scores.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-14 DOI:10.2459/JCM.0000000000001632
Federica Troisi, Pietro Guida, Nicola Vitulano, Adriana Argentiero, Andrea Passantino, Massimo Iacoviello, Massimo Grimaldi
{"title":"Clinical complexity of an Italian cardiovascular intensive care unit: the role of mortality and severity risk scores.","authors":"Federica Troisi, Pietro Guida, Nicola Vitulano, Adriana Argentiero, Andrea Passantino, Massimo Iacoviello, Massimo Grimaldi","doi":"10.2459/JCM.0000000000001632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The identification of patients at greater mortality risk of death at admission into an intensive cardiovascular care unit (ICCU) has relevant consequences for clinical decision-making. We described patient characteristics at admission into an ICCU by predicted mortality risk assessed with noncardiac intensive care unit (ICU) and evaluated their performance in predicting patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 202 consecutive patients (130 men, 75 ± 12 years) were admitted into our tertiary-care ICCU in a 20-week period. We evaluated, on the first 24 h data, in-hospital mortality risk according to Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS 3); Sepsis related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score and the Mayo Cardiac intensive care unit Admission Risk Score (M-CARS) were also calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Predicted mortality was significantly lower than observed (5% during ICCU and 7% at discharge) for APACHE II and SAPS 3 (17% for both scores). Mortality risk was associated with older age, more frequent comorbidities, severe clinical presentation and complications. The APACHE II, SAPS 3, SOFA and M-CARS had good discriminative ability in distinguishing deaths and survivors with poor calibration of risk scores predicting mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a recent contemporary cohort of patients admitted into the ICCU for a variety of acute and critical cardiovascular conditions, scoring systems used in general ICU had good discrimination for patients' clinical severity and mortality. Available scores preserve powerful discrimination but the overestimation of mortality suggests the importance of specific tailored scores to improve risk assessment of patients admitted into ICCUs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15228,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"25 7","pages":"511-518"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2459/JCM.0000000000001632","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The identification of patients at greater mortality risk of death at admission into an intensive cardiovascular care unit (ICCU) has relevant consequences for clinical decision-making. We described patient characteristics at admission into an ICCU by predicted mortality risk assessed with noncardiac intensive care unit (ICU) and evaluated their performance in predicting patient outcomes.

Methods: A total of 202 consecutive patients (130 men, 75 ± 12 years) were admitted into our tertiary-care ICCU in a 20-week period. We evaluated, on the first 24 h data, in-hospital mortality risk according to Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS 3); Sepsis related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score and the Mayo Cardiac intensive care unit Admission Risk Score (M-CARS) were also calculated.

Results: Predicted mortality was significantly lower than observed (5% during ICCU and 7% at discharge) for APACHE II and SAPS 3 (17% for both scores). Mortality risk was associated with older age, more frequent comorbidities, severe clinical presentation and complications. The APACHE II, SAPS 3, SOFA and M-CARS had good discriminative ability in distinguishing deaths and survivors with poor calibration of risk scores predicting mortality.

Conclusion: In a recent contemporary cohort of patients admitted into the ICCU for a variety of acute and critical cardiovascular conditions, scoring systems used in general ICU had good discrimination for patients' clinical severity and mortality. Available scores preserve powerful discrimination but the overestimation of mortality suggests the importance of specific tailored scores to improve risk assessment of patients admitted into ICCUs.

意大利心血管重症监护病房的临床复杂性:死亡率和严重性风险评分的作用。
目的:识别入住心血管重症监护病房(ICCU)时死亡风险较高的患者对临床决策具有重要意义。我们根据非心脏重症监护病房(ICU)评估的预测死亡风险描述了患者入住 ICCU 时的特征,并评估了其在预测患者预后方面的性能:我们的三级重症监护病房在 20 周内连续收治了 202 名患者(130 名男性,75 ± 12 岁)。我们根据急性生理学和慢性病健康评估 II(APACHE II)和简化急性生理学评分 3(SAPS 3)对最初 24 小时的数据进行了院内死亡风险评估;还计算了脓毒症相关器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分和梅奥心脏重症监护病房入院风险评分(M-CARS):APACHE II和SAPS 3的预测死亡率明显低于观察死亡率(ICCU期间为5%,出院时为7%)(两个评分均为17%)。死亡率风险与年龄较大、合并症较多、严重临床表现和并发症有关。APACHE II、SAPS 3、SOFA和M-CARS在区分死亡和存活方面具有良好的鉴别能力,但预测死亡率的风险评分校准较差:结论:在最近一组因各种急性和危重心血管疾病入住重症监护病房的患者中,普通重症监护病房使用的评分系统对患者的临床严重程度和死亡率有很好的区分度。现有的评分保留了强大的辨别能力,但对死亡率的高估表明,为改善对入住重症监护病房患者的风险评估而量身定制的特定评分非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine
Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
26.70%
发文量
189
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine is a monthly publication of the Italian Federation of Cardiology. It publishes original research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches, case reports, design and goals of clinical trials, review articles, points of view, editorials and Images in cardiovascular medicine. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. ​
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信