How Healthcare Providers Decide on a Referral Location in Telephone Triage: A Cross-sectional Study.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of General Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-03 DOI:10.1007/s11606-024-08841-4
Aaron J Fried, Christine Gladman, Darren A DeWalt
{"title":"How Healthcare Providers Decide on a Referral Location in Telephone Triage: A Cross-sectional Study.","authors":"Aaron J Fried, Christine Gladman, Darren A DeWalt","doi":"10.1007/s11606-024-08841-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately 25% of patients that present to the emergency department (ED) do so after contact with a healthcare professional. Many of these patients could be effectively managed in non-ED ambulatory settings. Aligning patients with safe and appropriate outpatient care has the potential to improve ED overcrowding, patient experience, outcomes, and costs. Little is understood about how healthcare providers approach triage decision-making and what factors influence their choices.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate how providers think about patient triage, and what factors influence their decision-making when triaging patient calls.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional survey-based study in which participants make triage decisions for hypothetical clinical scenarios.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Healthcare providers in the specialties of internal medicine, family medicine, or emergency medicine within a large integrated healthcare system in the Southeast.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Differences in individual training and practice characteristics were used to compare observed differences in triage outcomes. Free-response data were evaluated to identify themes and factors affecting triage decisions.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Out of 72 total participants, substantial variability in triage decision-making was observed among all patient cases. Attending physicians triaged 1.4 fewer cases to ED care compared with resident physicians (p < 0.001, 95% CI 0.62-2.1). Academic attendings demonstrated a trend toward fewer cases to ED care compared with community attendings (0.61, p = 0.188, 95% CI - 0.31-1.5). Qualitative data highlighted the complex considerations in provider triage and led to the development of a novel conceptual model to describe the cognitive triage process and the main influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Triage decision-making for healthcare providers is influenced by many factors related to clinical resources, care coordination, patient factors, and clinician factors. The complex considerations involved yield variability in triage decisions that is largely unexplained by descriptive physician factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2888-2894"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11576707/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-08841-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Approximately 25% of patients that present to the emergency department (ED) do so after contact with a healthcare professional. Many of these patients could be effectively managed in non-ED ambulatory settings. Aligning patients with safe and appropriate outpatient care has the potential to improve ED overcrowding, patient experience, outcomes, and costs. Little is understood about how healthcare providers approach triage decision-making and what factors influence their choices.

Objectives: To evaluate how providers think about patient triage, and what factors influence their decision-making when triaging patient calls.

Design: Cross-sectional survey-based study in which participants make triage decisions for hypothetical clinical scenarios.

Participants: Healthcare providers in the specialties of internal medicine, family medicine, or emergency medicine within a large integrated healthcare system in the Southeast.

Main measures: Differences in individual training and practice characteristics were used to compare observed differences in triage outcomes. Free-response data were evaluated to identify themes and factors affecting triage decisions.

Key results: Out of 72 total participants, substantial variability in triage decision-making was observed among all patient cases. Attending physicians triaged 1.4 fewer cases to ED care compared with resident physicians (p < 0.001, 95% CI 0.62-2.1). Academic attendings demonstrated a trend toward fewer cases to ED care compared with community attendings (0.61, p = 0.188, 95% CI - 0.31-1.5). Qualitative data highlighted the complex considerations in provider triage and led to the development of a novel conceptual model to describe the cognitive triage process and the main influencing factors.

Conclusions: Triage decision-making for healthcare providers is influenced by many factors related to clinical resources, care coordination, patient factors, and clinician factors. The complex considerations involved yield variability in triage decisions that is largely unexplained by descriptive physician factors.

Abstract Image

医疗服务提供者如何在电话分诊中决定转诊地点:横断面研究
背景:约有 25% 的急诊患者是在与专业医护人员接触后才到急诊科就诊的。其中许多患者可以在非急诊科门诊环境中得到有效管理。让患者接受安全、适当的门诊治疗有可能改善急诊科的拥挤状况、患者体验、治疗效果和成本。人们对医疗服务提供者如何进行分诊决策以及哪些因素会影响他们的选择知之甚少:评估医疗服务提供者如何考虑患者分流,以及哪些因素会影响他们在分流患者时的决策:设计:横断面调查研究,参与者在假设的临床场景中做出分流决策:主要测量指标:主要测量指标:利用个人培训和实践特点的差异来比较分诊结果的观察差异。对自由应答数据进行评估,以确定影响分诊决策的主题和因素:在 72 名参与者中,所有病例的分诊决策都存在很大差异。与住院医师相比,主治医师分流到急诊室治疗的病例少 1.4 例(p 结论:分流决策受医疗服务提供者的影响:医疗服务提供者的分诊决策受到临床资源、护理协调、患者因素和临床医生因素等诸多因素的影响。这些复杂的因素导致了分诊决策的变化,而这些变化在很大程度上无法用描述性的医生因素来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信