Akhil Rao, Emily Shih, Wilson Szeto, Pavan Atluri, Michael Acker, Walter Clark Hargrove, Lee Hafen, Robert Smith, Michael Ibrahim
{"title":"Rerepair for Mitral Insufficiency.","authors":"Akhil Rao, Emily Shih, Wilson Szeto, Pavan Atluri, Michael Acker, Walter Clark Hargrove, Lee Hafen, Robert Smith, Michael Ibrahim","doi":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.05.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mitral valve repair provides superior outcomes to replacement for primary mitral regurgitation. Whether this is true after previous repair is unknown. This study presents the results of a strategy of rerepair for failed mitral valve repair. The study examined patients who were brought to the operating room for an intended mitral valve rerepair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study investigators reviewed the last decade of institutional mitral valve databases at The University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia, PA) and Baylor Scott & White The Heart Hospital - Plano (Plano, TX) and identified patients who underwent repeat mitral valve repair, in whom the index operation was mitral valve repair. The study analyzed their operative details and the clinical and echocardiographic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2008 and 2021, 71 patients (aged 61.5 ±10.7 years; 20% female) underwent mitral valve reoperation at an mean of 6.24 ± 7.62 years after an index mitral repair. A total of 20% of patients presented with New York Heart Association functional class III or IV symptoms. At the index operation, 34 patients (47.9%) had repair through a right minithoracotomy. Fifteen patients (21.1%) required the reoperation within 1 year. There were 0 early and 8 late deaths. One patient who underwent mitral replacement instead of repair required reoperation for paravalvular leak during the follow-up period. Three patients required mitral valve replacement at an average of 2.28 ± 2.03 years after initial mitral valve rerepair.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mitral rerepair can be performed with acceptable results at a valve reference center. Durability and functional advantages of this approach remain to be proven.</p>","PeriodicalId":50976,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"370-376"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.05.022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Mitral valve repair provides superior outcomes to replacement for primary mitral regurgitation. Whether this is true after previous repair is unknown. This study presents the results of a strategy of rerepair for failed mitral valve repair. The study examined patients who were brought to the operating room for an intended mitral valve rerepair.
Methods: Study investigators reviewed the last decade of institutional mitral valve databases at The University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia, PA) and Baylor Scott & White The Heart Hospital - Plano (Plano, TX) and identified patients who underwent repeat mitral valve repair, in whom the index operation was mitral valve repair. The study analyzed their operative details and the clinical and echocardiographic outcomes.
Results: Between 2008 and 2021, 71 patients (aged 61.5 ±10.7 years; 20% female) underwent mitral valve reoperation at an mean of 6.24 ± 7.62 years after an index mitral repair. A total of 20% of patients presented with New York Heart Association functional class III or IV symptoms. At the index operation, 34 patients (47.9%) had repair through a right minithoracotomy. Fifteen patients (21.1%) required the reoperation within 1 year. There were 0 early and 8 late deaths. One patient who underwent mitral replacement instead of repair required reoperation for paravalvular leak during the follow-up period. Three patients required mitral valve replacement at an average of 2.28 ± 2.03 years after initial mitral valve rerepair.
Conclusions: Mitral rerepair can be performed with acceptable results at a valve reference center. Durability and functional advantages of this approach remain to be proven.
期刊介绍:
The mission of The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is to promote scholarship in cardiothoracic surgery patient care, clinical practice, research, education, and policy. As the official journal of two of the largest American associations in its specialty, this leading monthly enjoys outstanding editorial leadership and maintains rigorous selection standards.
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery features:
• Full-length original articles on clinical advances, current surgical methods, and controversial topics and techniques
• New Technology articles
• Case reports
• "How-to-do-it" features
• Reviews of current literature
• Supplements on symposia
• Commentary pieces and correspondence
• CME
• Online-only case reports, "how-to-do-its", and images in cardiothoracic surgery.
An authoritative, clinically oriented, comprehensive resource, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is committed to providing a place for all thoracic surgeons to relate experiences which will help improve patient care.