Patients with Periprosthetic Femoral Hip Fractures are Commonly Classified as Having Osteoporosis Based on DXA Measurements.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Calcified Tissue International Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-04 DOI:10.1007/s00223-024-01237-w
Jacob Ritter, Assil-Ramin Alimy, Alexander Simon, Jan Hubert, Christian Ries, Tim Rolvien, Frank Timo Beil
{"title":"Patients with Periprosthetic Femoral Hip Fractures are Commonly Classified as Having Osteoporosis Based on DXA Measurements.","authors":"Jacob Ritter, Assil-Ramin Alimy, Alexander Simon, Jan Hubert, Christian Ries, Tim Rolvien, Frank Timo Beil","doi":"10.1007/s00223-024-01237-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Periprosthetic femoral hip fractures are subject to an increasing incidence and are often considered to be related to osteoporosis. However, there are no available studies that have determined the frequency of osteoporosis in affected patients using gold standard dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). In this retrospective comparative study, we analyzed the DXA results of 40 patients with periprosthetic femoral hip fractures who were treated surgically in our department. DXA measurements were performed at the total hip and the lumbar spine to determine bone mineral density T-scores. Data were compared to two age-, sex-, and BMI-matched control groups in which patients underwent DXA prior to aseptic revision surgery for other causes or primary THA (consisting of 40 patients each). The mean T-score in the periprosthetic fracture cohort was significantly lower (- 1.78 ± 1.78) than that of the aseptic revision (- 0.65 ± 1.58, mean difference - 1.13 [95% CI - 1.88 to - 0.37]; p = 0.001) and the primary THA cohort (- 0.77 ± 1.34, mean difference - 1.01 [95% CI - 1.77 to - 0.26]; p = 0.005). Accordingly, osteoporosis was detected more frequently (45%) in the fracture cohort compared to patients undergoing aseptic revision (12.5%) and primary THA (10%). In conclusion, almost half of the patients with periprosthetic femoral hip fractures have osteoporosis according to DXA measurements. A regular assessment of bone health in THA enables identification of patients with osteoporosis who likely benefit from initiation of osteoporosis medication and cemented stem fixation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9601,"journal":{"name":"Calcified Tissue International","volume":" ","pages":"142-149"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11246254/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Calcified Tissue International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-024-01237-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Periprosthetic femoral hip fractures are subject to an increasing incidence and are often considered to be related to osteoporosis. However, there are no available studies that have determined the frequency of osteoporosis in affected patients using gold standard dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). In this retrospective comparative study, we analyzed the DXA results of 40 patients with periprosthetic femoral hip fractures who were treated surgically in our department. DXA measurements were performed at the total hip and the lumbar spine to determine bone mineral density T-scores. Data were compared to two age-, sex-, and BMI-matched control groups in which patients underwent DXA prior to aseptic revision surgery for other causes or primary THA (consisting of 40 patients each). The mean T-score in the periprosthetic fracture cohort was significantly lower (- 1.78 ± 1.78) than that of the aseptic revision (- 0.65 ± 1.58, mean difference - 1.13 [95% CI - 1.88 to - 0.37]; p = 0.001) and the primary THA cohort (- 0.77 ± 1.34, mean difference - 1.01 [95% CI - 1.77 to - 0.26]; p = 0.005). Accordingly, osteoporosis was detected more frequently (45%) in the fracture cohort compared to patients undergoing aseptic revision (12.5%) and primary THA (10%). In conclusion, almost half of the patients with periprosthetic femoral hip fractures have osteoporosis according to DXA measurements. A regular assessment of bone health in THA enables identification of patients with osteoporosis who likely benefit from initiation of osteoporosis medication and cemented stem fixation.

Abstract Image

根据 DXA 测量结果,人工股骨髋关节周围骨折患者通常被归类为骨质疏松症患者。
股骨假体周围髋部骨折的发生率越来越高,通常被认为与骨质疏松症有关。然而,目前还没有研究使用金标准双能 X 射线吸收测定法(DXA)来确定受影响患者的骨质疏松症发生率。在这项回顾性对比研究中,我们分析了在我科接受手术治疗的 40 名股骨假体周围髋部骨折患者的 DXA 结果。我们对患者的全髋和腰椎进行了 DXA 测量,以确定骨矿密度 T 值。数据与两个年龄、性别和体重指数相匹配的对照组进行了比较,在这两个对照组中,患者在因其他原因接受无菌翻修手术或初次 THA 之前都接受了 DXA 检查(每组 40 名患者)。假体周围骨折组的平均 T 评分(- 1.78 ± 1.78)明显低于无菌翻修组(- 0.65 ± 1.58,平均差异 - 1.13 [95% CI - 1.88 至 - 0.37];P = 0.001)和原发性 THA 组(- 0.77 ± 1.34,平均差异 - 1.01 [95% CI - 1.77 至 - 0.26];P = 0.005)。因此,与接受无菌翻修(12.5%)和初次 THA(10%)的患者相比,骨折队列中发现骨质疏松症的比例更高(45%)。总之,根据 DXA 测量结果,近一半的股骨假体周围髋部骨折患者患有骨质疏松症。定期评估THA患者的骨健康状况可识别出骨质疏松症患者,这些患者可能会从骨质疏松症药物治疗和骨水泥柄固定中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Calcified Tissue International
Calcified Tissue International 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.40%
发文量
112
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Calcified Tissue International and Musculoskeletal Research publishes original research and reviews concerning the structure and function of bone, and other musculoskeletal tissues in living organisms and clinical studies of musculoskeletal disease. It includes studies of cell biology, molecular biology, intracellular signalling, and physiology, as well as research into the hormones, cytokines and other mediators that influence the musculoskeletal system. The journal also publishes clinical studies of relevance to bone disease, mineral metabolism, muscle function, and musculoskeletal interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信