Major Trauma Triage Tool Study (MATTS) expert consensus-derived injury assessment tool

Gordon Fuller, Nathan Howes, Roderick Mackenzie, S. Keating, Janette Turner, Christopher Holt, Joshua Miller, Steve Goodacre
{"title":"Major Trauma Triage Tool Study (MATTS) expert consensus-derived injury assessment tool","authors":"Gordon Fuller, Nathan Howes, Roderick Mackenzie, S. Keating, Janette Turner, Christopher Holt, Joshua Miller, Steve Goodacre","doi":"10.29045/14784726.2024.6.9.1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Major trauma centre (MTC) care has been associated with improved outcomes for injured patients. English ambulance services and trauma networks currently use a range of triage tools to select patients for bypass to MTCs. A standardised national triage tool may improve\n triage accuracy, cost-effectiveness and the reproducibility of decision-making.Methods: We conducted an expert consensus process to derive and develop a major trauma triage tool for use in English trauma networks. A web-based Delphi survey was conducted to identify and confirm candidate\n triage tool predictors of major trauma. Facilitated roundtable consensus meetings were convened to confirm the proposed triage tool’s purpose, target diagnostic threshold, scope, intended population and structure, as well as the individual triage tool predictors and cut points. Public\n and patient involvement (PPI) focus groups were held to ensure triage tool acceptability to service users.Results: The Delphi survey reached consensus on nine triage variables in two domains, from 109 candidate variables after three rounds. Following a review of the relevant evidence\n during the consensus meetings, iterative rounds of discussion achieved consensus on the following aspects of the triage tool: reference standard, scope, target diagnostic accuracy and intended population. A three-step tool comprising physiology, anatomical injury and clinical judgement domains,\n with triage variables assessed in parallel, was recommended. The triage tool was received favourably by PPI focus groups.Conclusions: This paper presents a new expert consensus derived major trauma triage tool with defined purpose, scope, intended population, structure, constituent\n variables, variable definitions and thresholds. Prospective evaluation is required to determine clinical and cost-effectiveness, acceptability and usability.","PeriodicalId":72470,"journal":{"name":"British paramedic journal","volume":"18 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British paramedic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2024.6.9.1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Major trauma centre (MTC) care has been associated with improved outcomes for injured patients. English ambulance services and trauma networks currently use a range of triage tools to select patients for bypass to MTCs. A standardised national triage tool may improve triage accuracy, cost-effectiveness and the reproducibility of decision-making.Methods: We conducted an expert consensus process to derive and develop a major trauma triage tool for use in English trauma networks. A web-based Delphi survey was conducted to identify and confirm candidate triage tool predictors of major trauma. Facilitated roundtable consensus meetings were convened to confirm the proposed triage tool’s purpose, target diagnostic threshold, scope, intended population and structure, as well as the individual triage tool predictors and cut points. Public and patient involvement (PPI) focus groups were held to ensure triage tool acceptability to service users.Results: The Delphi survey reached consensus on nine triage variables in two domains, from 109 candidate variables after three rounds. Following a review of the relevant evidence during the consensus meetings, iterative rounds of discussion achieved consensus on the following aspects of the triage tool: reference standard, scope, target diagnostic accuracy and intended population. A three-step tool comprising physiology, anatomical injury and clinical judgement domains, with triage variables assessed in parallel, was recommended. The triage tool was received favourably by PPI focus groups.Conclusions: This paper presents a new expert consensus derived major trauma triage tool with defined purpose, scope, intended population, structure, constituent variables, variable definitions and thresholds. Prospective evaluation is required to determine clinical and cost-effectiveness, acceptability and usability.
重大创伤分诊工具研究 (MATTS) 专家共识衍生的损伤评估工具
导言:主要创伤中心(MTC)护理与改善受伤病人的治疗效果有关。英国的救护车服务和创伤网络目前使用一系列分流工具来选择将病人分流到重创中心。标准化的全国分诊工具可以提高分诊的准确性、成本效益和决策的可重复性:方法:我们开展了一项专家共识程序,以推导和开发供英国创伤网络使用的重大创伤分流工具。我们开展了一项基于网络的德尔菲调查,以确定并确认候选分诊工具的重大创伤预测指标。召开圆桌共识会议,以确认拟议分诊工具的目的、目标诊断阈值、范围、目标人群和结构,以及各个分诊工具预测因子和切点。此外,还举行了公众和患者参与(PPI)焦点小组会议,以确保服务用户对分流工具的可接受性:德尔菲调查从 109 个候选变量中筛选出两个领域的九个分流变量,经过三轮调查后达成了共识。在共识会议期间对相关证据进行审查后,经过反复讨论,就分诊工具的以下方面达成了共识:参考标准、范围、目标诊断准确性和目标人群。会议建议采用一种三步式工具,包括生理、解剖损伤和临床判断领域,并同时评估分诊变量。分诊工具得到了公众宣传焦点小组的好评:本文介绍了一种新的专家共识衍生的重大创伤分流工具,该工具具有明确的目的、范围、目标人群、结构、组成变量、变量定义和阈值。需要进行前瞻性评估,以确定临床和成本效益、可接受性和可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信