School restorative justice, restorative discipline rather than punishment: a systematic review

Julio-Raul Cantera-Rios, Neptali Zegarra-Salazar, Juan Méndez-Vergaray, Edward Flores
{"title":"School restorative justice, restorative discipline rather than punishment: a systematic review","authors":"Julio-Raul Cantera-Rios, Neptali Zegarra-Salazar, Juan Méndez-Vergaray, Edward Flores","doi":"10.11591/ijere.v13i3.25485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Restorative justice has become another alternative to do justice in society and its application is spreading outside the criminal field, although there are currently global proposals to apply it as restorative practices in the educational field with interesting results in relationships of coexistence, discipline, and confronting school violence, which impacts on the learning outcomes of students. The objective of this paper is to analyze the conditions of school discipline before the implementation of restorative practice strategies and the impact of their application as an alternative of damage restoration rather than punishment. The PRISMA methodology and the consultations of “Justice AND Restorative AND School” were carried out; also “Practices AND Restorative AND Students”; “Practices AND Restorative AND Violence”; “Justice AND Practices AND Restorative”, 30 articles published in Scopus and EBSCO carried out between 2018-2022 were considered. The studies showed significant benefits in the improvement of school discipline, reduction of suspensions, increased communication, respect, trust between students and teachers, among others; In this regard, the evidence continues to be limited and new studies are needed.","PeriodicalId":517136,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE)","volume":"31 41","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i3.25485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Restorative justice has become another alternative to do justice in society and its application is spreading outside the criminal field, although there are currently global proposals to apply it as restorative practices in the educational field with interesting results in relationships of coexistence, discipline, and confronting school violence, which impacts on the learning outcomes of students. The objective of this paper is to analyze the conditions of school discipline before the implementation of restorative practice strategies and the impact of their application as an alternative of damage restoration rather than punishment. The PRISMA methodology and the consultations of “Justice AND Restorative AND School” were carried out; also “Practices AND Restorative AND Students”; “Practices AND Restorative AND Violence”; “Justice AND Practices AND Restorative”, 30 articles published in Scopus and EBSCO carried out between 2018-2022 were considered. The studies showed significant benefits in the improvement of school discipline, reduction of suspensions, increased communication, respect, trust between students and teachers, among others; In this regard, the evidence continues to be limited and new studies are needed.
学校恢复性司法、恢复性纪律而非惩罚:系统性审查
恢复性司法已成为社会伸张正义的另一种选择,其应用正在刑事领域之外扩展,尽管目前全球都在提议将其作为恢复性做法应用于教育领域,并在共存关系、纪律和对抗校园暴力方面取得了令人感兴趣的成果,这对学生的学习成果产生了影响。本文旨在分析实施恢复性实践策略之前的学校纪律状况,以及实施这些策略作为恢复损害而非惩罚的替代方案所产生的影响。本文采用 PRISMA 方法,并参考了 "正义与恢复性与学校"、"实践与恢复性与学生"、"实践与恢复性与暴力"、"正义与实践与恢复性",以及 Scopus 和 EBSCO 在 2018-2022 年间发表的 30 篇文章。这些研究表明,恢复性教育在改善学校纪律、减少停学、加强师生之间的沟通、尊重和信任等方面有很大益处;在这方面,证据仍然有限,需要开展新的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信