Comparison of WASPAS and VIKOR methods to determine non-cash food assistance recipients

Ramadiani Ramadiani, Muhammad Luthfi Fahrozi, Muhammad Labib Jundillah, Azainil Azainil
{"title":"Comparison of WASPAS and VIKOR methods to determine non-cash food assistance recipients","authors":"Ramadiani Ramadiani, Muhammad Luthfi Fahrozi, Muhammad Labib Jundillah, Azainil Azainil","doi":"10.11591/ijai.v13.i2.pp1430-1442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-cash food assistance or bantuan pangan non-tunai (BPNT) is a government program of the Republic of Indonesia by distributes food assistance in non-cash to beneficiary families. The process of distributing BPNT still needs to be done with the data and criteria set, because the existing BPNT distribution is considered not right on target. We need a method that can help provide an objective decision. One method that can be used in making decisions is the weighted aggregated sum product assessment (WASPAS) and Vlsekriterijumsko Koompromisno Rangiranje (VIKOR) methods. The results of the calculations from the two methods will then be chosen which is the best, by conducting sensitivity tests and accuracy tests. This study uses 100 sample data and 16 criteria. The sensitivity test results are 9.780678997% for the WASPAS method and -0.0759182% for the VIKOR method, while the results of the accuracy test show that both methods have the same level of accuracy, which is 80%. Based on the comparison of the sensitivity test and accuracy test of the two methods, the WASPAS method is considered more accurate in determining the recipients of the BPNT program because the WASPAS method has a higher sensitivity test value than the VIKOR method.","PeriodicalId":507934,"journal":{"name":"IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence (IJ-AI)","volume":"5 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence (IJ-AI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11591/ijai.v13.i2.pp1430-1442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-cash food assistance or bantuan pangan non-tunai (BPNT) is a government program of the Republic of Indonesia by distributes food assistance in non-cash to beneficiary families. The process of distributing BPNT still needs to be done with the data and criteria set, because the existing BPNT distribution is considered not right on target. We need a method that can help provide an objective decision. One method that can be used in making decisions is the weighted aggregated sum product assessment (WASPAS) and Vlsekriterijumsko Koompromisno Rangiranje (VIKOR) methods. The results of the calculations from the two methods will then be chosen which is the best, by conducting sensitivity tests and accuracy tests. This study uses 100 sample data and 16 criteria. The sensitivity test results are 9.780678997% for the WASPAS method and -0.0759182% for the VIKOR method, while the results of the accuracy test show that both methods have the same level of accuracy, which is 80%. Based on the comparison of the sensitivity test and accuracy test of the two methods, the WASPAS method is considered more accurate in determining the recipients of the BPNT program because the WASPAS method has a higher sensitivity test value than the VIKOR method.
比较 WASPAS 和 VIKOR 方法以确定非现金粮食援助受助人
非现金粮食援助或 bantuan pangan non-tunai(BPNT)是印度尼西亚共和国向受益家庭发放非现金粮食援助的一项政府计划。BPNT 的分配过程仍需根据设定的数据和标准进行,因为现有的 BPNT 分配被认为并不准确。我们需要一种有助于做出客观决定的方法。加权汇总乘积评估法(WASPAS)和 Vlsekriterijumsko Koompromisno Rangiranje 法(VIKOR)就是一种可以用于决策的方法。然后,通过敏感性测试和准确性测试,从两种方法的计算结果中选出最佳方法。本研究使用了 100 个样本数据和 16 个标准。灵敏度测试结果显示,WASPAS 方法的灵敏度为 9.780678997%,而 VIKOR 方法的灵敏度为-0.0759182%;准确度测试结果显示,两种方法的准确度相同,均为 80%。根据两种方法的灵敏度测试和准确度测试的比较,我们认为 WASPAS 方法在确定 BPNT 计划受助人方面更为准确,因为 WASPAS 方法的灵敏度测试值高于 VIKOR 方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信