An electromyography system, kinetics and kinematics variables are insufficient to predict the failure-to-recover an impending loss of balance

Q4 Engineering
M. L. Aguiar, Caluê Papcke, E. Scheeren
{"title":"An electromyography system, kinetics and kinematics variables are insufficient to predict the failure-to-recover an impending loss of balance","authors":"M. L. Aguiar, Caluê Papcke, E. Scheeren","doi":"10.15593/rjbiomech/2020.1.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The body balance maintenance is performed through synchronized motor strategies, to preserve functional mobility. The purpose of this study is to compare the balance recovery mechanisms among young adults in an impending loss of balance. Thirty healthy young adult [age 24.87±4.16; weight 72.69±14.73 kg; growth 1.72±0.08 m] participated in the study. Seven perturbations were applied with a progressive velocity of the perturbation, in the antero-posterior direction. The following variables were analyzed: active time of muscle contraction, latency and displacement amplitude of the center of pressure, and angular variation of the ankle. For each perturbation, the subjects were classified according to their ability to recover balance: “no step” and step forward or hold the rope of the safety vest support. There were no significant differences between groups in all variables analyzed. At lower velocities of displacement, the group of “no step” presented greater angular variation for the knee joint, lower pressure center displacement range, and lower active time of normalized contraction of the muscle anterior tibial. The results suggest that the variables analyzed were insufficient to identify significant differences in the adoption of strategies for recovery of balance in an impending loss of balance.","PeriodicalId":37840,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Biomechanics","volume":" 39","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15593/rjbiomech/2020.1.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The body balance maintenance is performed through synchronized motor strategies, to preserve functional mobility. The purpose of this study is to compare the balance recovery mechanisms among young adults in an impending loss of balance. Thirty healthy young adult [age 24.87±4.16; weight 72.69±14.73 kg; growth 1.72±0.08 m] participated in the study. Seven perturbations were applied with a progressive velocity of the perturbation, in the antero-posterior direction. The following variables were analyzed: active time of muscle contraction, latency and displacement amplitude of the center of pressure, and angular variation of the ankle. For each perturbation, the subjects were classified according to their ability to recover balance: “no step” and step forward or hold the rope of the safety vest support. There were no significant differences between groups in all variables analyzed. At lower velocities of displacement, the group of “no step” presented greater angular variation for the knee joint, lower pressure center displacement range, and lower active time of normalized contraction of the muscle anterior tibial. The results suggest that the variables analyzed were insufficient to identify significant differences in the adoption of strategies for recovery of balance in an impending loss of balance.
肌电图系统、动力学和运动学变量不足以预测即将失去平衡时的失误恢复情况
身体平衡的保持是通过同步运动策略来实现的,目的是保持功能性活动能力。本研究的目的是比较即将失去平衡的年轻成年人的平衡恢复机制。30 名健康青壮年[年龄 24.87±4.16;体重 72.69±14.73kg;身高 1.72±0.08 m]参加了研究。研究人员在前后方向以渐进的速度施加了七次扰动。对以下变量进行了分析:肌肉收缩的有效时间、压力中心的潜伏期和位移幅度以及踝关节的角度变化。对于每次扰动,受试者根据其恢复平衡的能力进行分类:"不迈步 "和向前迈步或握住安全背心支撑绳。在分析的所有变量中,各组之间均无明显差异。在较低的位移速度下,"不迈步 "组的膝关节角度变化较大,压力中心位移范围较小,胫前肌正常化收缩的活动时间较短。结果表明,所分析的变量不足以确定在即将失去平衡时采取恢复平衡策略的显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Russian Journal of Biomechanics
Russian Journal of Biomechanics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biophysics
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Russian Journal of Biomechanics publishes peer reviewed articles related to the principal topics in biomechanics. This Journal was established to improve the information interchange between specialists on biomechanics from Russia and other countries. Biomechanics is defined as the mechanics of living tissues and biomaterials. The Journal presents original papers of a wide biomechanical profile. A balance of biomechanical and medical problems is the principal aspect of the Journal activities. The Journal encourages the submission of original articles, reviews, short communications and case studies in all areas of biomechanics, including, but not limited to: • General problems and methods of biomechanics • Rheological properties of living tissues • Biomaterials and prostheses • Dental biomechanics • Human movement analysis • Musculoskeletal biomechanics • Cardiovascular biomechanics • Biomechanics of breathing • Tissue and cellular biomechanics • Sport biomechanics • Biomechanical problems in biotechnology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信