Bystander

Paula Hoy
{"title":"Bystander","authors":"Paula Hoy","doi":"10.4135/9781452229300.n276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"My thesis raises existential questions about identity and the construction of meaning using language as a premise and platform to provoke inquiry about the distinction between various classifications of viewer. A reexamination of the term bystander compelled me to create violently themed imagery in order to locate boundaries within viewership roles. Although it shares similarities with the roles of observer, spectator, and witness, in terms of the bystanderʼs visual observance of an event, there are unclear connotations that allude to varying degrees of lucidity and sentience among these roles. The agency of the viewer is evaluated by his/her level of cognizance and participation in the observed event. The French philosopher Jacques Rancière referred to a heightened state of a viewerʼs self-awareness as an ʻemancipation of the spectatorʼ. This is where the viewer abandons their passive role of observation for one that is rational and presently engaged. Following Rancièreʼs argument, my thesis suggests that the bystander is transformed by the context and circumstance/s of his/her surroundings (violence) and elevated or ʻemancipatedʼ to a status of selfawareness that exceeds all other kinds of viewership roles. Thus all other forms of observation are rendered obsolete as the bystander achieves a new status —an alterity that surpasses his/her own inert physical presence in the world.","PeriodicalId":289033,"journal":{"name":"1789–90","volume":"115 42","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1789–90","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452229300.n276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

My thesis raises existential questions about identity and the construction of meaning using language as a premise and platform to provoke inquiry about the distinction between various classifications of viewer. A reexamination of the term bystander compelled me to create violently themed imagery in order to locate boundaries within viewership roles. Although it shares similarities with the roles of observer, spectator, and witness, in terms of the bystanderʼs visual observance of an event, there are unclear connotations that allude to varying degrees of lucidity and sentience among these roles. The agency of the viewer is evaluated by his/her level of cognizance and participation in the observed event. The French philosopher Jacques Rancière referred to a heightened state of a viewerʼs self-awareness as an ʻemancipation of the spectatorʼ. This is where the viewer abandons their passive role of observation for one that is rational and presently engaged. Following Rancièreʼs argument, my thesis suggests that the bystander is transformed by the context and circumstance/s of his/her surroundings (violence) and elevated or ʻemancipatedʼ to a status of selfawareness that exceeds all other kinds of viewership roles. Thus all other forms of observation are rendered obsolete as the bystander achieves a new status —an alterity that surpasses his/her own inert physical presence in the world.
旁观者
我的论文以语言为前提和平台,提出了关于身份和意义建构的存在性问题,引发了对各种观众分类之间区别的探究。对 "旁观者 "一词的重新审视迫使我创作以暴力为主题的图像,以确定观众角色的界限。虽然旁观者与观察者、旁观者和目击者等角色有相似之处,但就旁观者对事件的视觉观察而言,其内涵并不明确,暗指这些角色之间不同程度的清醒和感知。观众的能动性取决于其对所观察事件的认知和参与程度。法国哲学家雅克-朗西埃(Jacques Rancière)将观众自我意识的增强状态称为 "观众的解放"。在这种情况下,观众放弃了被动观察的角色,转而以理性的方式参与其中。根据朗西埃的论点,我的论文认为,旁观者因其周围环境(暴力)的背景和情况而改变,并被提升或 "解放 "到一种自我意识的地位,这种地位超越了所有其他类型的观众角色。因此,随着旁观者获得一种新的地位--一种超越其自身在世界上的惰性物理存在的改变性,所有其他形式的观察都变得过时了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信