{"title":"ESL Students Use of Alliteration and Assonance in Recalling Formulaic Language","authors":"Paul Horness","doi":"10.61508/refl.v27i1.241971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Formulaic language, such as lexical phrases as hot as hell or pass the buck, in English is common in daily usage. Although formulaic language is common, the lexical phrases are often excluded from word lists. Second language learners of English need to use formulaic language to enhance their proficiency level. Beyond incorporating lexical phrases to word lists, other methods should be examined. This study examined the mnemonic benefit of noticing alliterative and assonant phrases with low and high proficiency learners of English. Previous research has shown that highlighting the concepts of alliteration and assonance is beneficial in recalling monosyllabic two-word units such as pet peeve or bite size. This study inquired whether the mnemonic effect is effective with longer lexical phrases beyond two-syllable phrases even when deliberative learning is not involved. Students from two public universities in Japan participated in the semester-long activity. The participants were asked to classify the phrases into different categories, and then recall the phrases over time. The results indicate that the mnemonic effect is not as clear with longer lexical phrases than it is with monosyllabic lexical phrases. Recall for alliterative expressions seemed to be better than for assonant expressions, but similar to non-salient expressions. Lower proficiency learners seem to process the longer lexical phrases similar to higher proficiency learners so the benefit of noticing alliterative and assonant expressions might be equal for both groups.","PeriodicalId":36332,"journal":{"name":"rEFLections","volume":"11 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"rEFLections","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v27i1.241971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Formulaic language, such as lexical phrases as hot as hell or pass the buck, in English is common in daily usage. Although formulaic language is common, the lexical phrases are often excluded from word lists. Second language learners of English need to use formulaic language to enhance their proficiency level. Beyond incorporating lexical phrases to word lists, other methods should be examined. This study examined the mnemonic benefit of noticing alliterative and assonant phrases with low and high proficiency learners of English. Previous research has shown that highlighting the concepts of alliteration and assonance is beneficial in recalling monosyllabic two-word units such as pet peeve or bite size. This study inquired whether the mnemonic effect is effective with longer lexical phrases beyond two-syllable phrases even when deliberative learning is not involved. Students from two public universities in Japan participated in the semester-long activity. The participants were asked to classify the phrases into different categories, and then recall the phrases over time. The results indicate that the mnemonic effect is not as clear with longer lexical phrases than it is with monosyllabic lexical phrases. Recall for alliterative expressions seemed to be better than for assonant expressions, but similar to non-salient expressions. Lower proficiency learners seem to process the longer lexical phrases similar to higher proficiency learners so the benefit of noticing alliterative and assonant expressions might be equal for both groups.
英语中的公式化语言,如 hot as hell 或 pass the buck 等词性短语,在日常使用中很常见。虽然公式化语言很常见,但词组往往被排除在单词表之外。英语第二语言学习者需要使用公式化语言来提高他们的熟练程度。除了将词性短语纳入单词表之外,还应研究其他方法。本研究考察了注意到拟声词和同音词短语对低水平和高水平英语学习者的记忆作用。以往的研究表明,突出押韵和同音的概念有利于记忆单音节双词单位,如 pet peeve 或 bite size。本研究探讨了在不涉及斟酌学习的情况下,记忆效果是否对双音节短语以外的较长词组有效。来自日本两所公立大学的学生参加了为期一学期的活动。参与者被要求将短语分为不同的类别,然后随着时间的推移回忆这些短语。结果表明,与单音节词组相比,较长词组的记忆效果并不明显。异音表达的记忆效果似乎比同音表达好,但与非异音表达相似。水平较低的学习者处理较长词汇短语的能力似乎与水平较高的学习者相似,因此注意到拟声词和同音词表达对这两组学习者的好处可能是相同的。