Correlation of HbA1c and glycated albumin in hemodialysis patients with diabetes melitus

Clara Elitha, Pusparini Pusparini
{"title":"Correlation of HbA1c and glycated albumin in hemodialysis patients with diabetes melitus","authors":"Clara Elitha, Pusparini Pusparini","doi":"10.20885/jkki.vol11.iss1.art7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Uses of HbA1c compared with glycated albumin as an indicator of glycemic control for hemodialysis patients(HD) needs to be evaluated. HbA1c has some limitations when used for HD because its results can falsely low or falsely high. It can be missunderstood if clinicians use HbA1c as glycemic control. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate correlation between HbA1c and GA in HD patients with Diabetes Mellitus (DM). Methods: This study was a cross sectional study conducted on November 2016 until January 2017. Its samples were obtained from 43 patients in HD with DM, fullfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria, located in a private hospital at east Jakarta. The HbA1c was measured by using a turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay method, and the GA was measured by using an enzimatic colorimetric method. In addition, a test of Pearson correlation was used to determine the correlation between HbA1c and GA with a significance of p<0.05. Results: Averages of patients age in this study was 57.16 ± 9.0 years old, including 24 men (55.8%) and 19 women (44.2%). The mean values of HbA1C were 8 ± 2.30%, and the mean values of GA were 30.02 ± 13.3%. The mean duration of the HD was 4.5 ± 1.3 years. The glycemic control based on GA was significantly better than the HbA1c with p = 0.028 (Chi-Square test). Pearson correlation showed that there were a significant correlation between HbA1c and GA with r = 0.759 and p = 0.000. Conclusion: There were a significant correlation between HbA1c with GA in HD patients with DM. Glycemic control based on GA was better than HbA1c.","PeriodicalId":508182,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan Indonesia","volume":"54 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20885/jkki.vol11.iss1.art7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Uses of HbA1c compared with glycated albumin as an indicator of glycemic control for hemodialysis patients(HD) needs to be evaluated. HbA1c has some limitations when used for HD because its results can falsely low or falsely high. It can be missunderstood if clinicians use HbA1c as glycemic control. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate correlation between HbA1c and GA in HD patients with Diabetes Mellitus (DM). Methods: This study was a cross sectional study conducted on November 2016 until January 2017. Its samples were obtained from 43 patients in HD with DM, fullfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria, located in a private hospital at east Jakarta. The HbA1c was measured by using a turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay method, and the GA was measured by using an enzimatic colorimetric method. In addition, a test of Pearson correlation was used to determine the correlation between HbA1c and GA with a significance of p<0.05. Results: Averages of patients age in this study was 57.16 ± 9.0 years old, including 24 men (55.8%) and 19 women (44.2%). The mean values of HbA1C were 8 ± 2.30%, and the mean values of GA were 30.02 ± 13.3%. The mean duration of the HD was 4.5 ± 1.3 years. The glycemic control based on GA was significantly better than the HbA1c with p = 0.028 (Chi-Square test). Pearson correlation showed that there were a significant correlation between HbA1c and GA with r = 0.759 and p = 0.000. Conclusion: There were a significant correlation between HbA1c with GA in HD patients with DM. Glycemic control based on GA was better than HbA1c.
血液透析糖尿病患者 HbA1c 和糖化白蛋白的相关性
背景:与糖化白蛋白相比,HbA1c 作为血液透析患者血糖控制指标的用途有待评估。HbA1c 在用于血液透析时有一些局限性,因为其结果可能过低或过高。如果临床医生将 HbA1c 用作血糖控制指标,可能会造成误解。研究目的本研究旨在评估糖尿病 (DM) HD 患者 HbA1c 和 GA 之间的相关性。研究方法本研究是一项横断面研究,于 2016 年 11 月至 2017 年 1 月进行。样本来自雅加达东部一家私立医院的 43 名符合纳入和排除标准的糖尿病 HD 患者。HbA1c 采用比浊抑制免疫测定法测定,GA 采用比色法测定。此外,还使用了皮尔逊相关性检验来确定 HbA1c 和 GA 之间的相关性,显著性为 P<0.05。结果本研究中患者的平均年龄为(57.16±9.0)岁,其中男性 24 人(55.8%),女性 19 人(44.2%)。HbA1C 平均值为 8 ± 2.30%,GA 平均值为 30.02 ± 13.3%。HD 的平均持续时间为 4.5 ± 1.3 年。基于 GA 的血糖控制明显优于 HbA1c,P = 0.028(Chi-Square 检验)。Pearson 相关性显示,HbA1c 和 GA 之间存在显著相关性,r = 0.759,p = 0.000。结论HD 糖尿病患者的 HbA1c 与 GA 之间存在明显相关性。基于 GA 的血糖控制效果优于 HbA1c。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信