Introduction: In search of a third lens

M. Kostera
{"title":"Introduction: In search of a third lens","authors":"M. Kostera","doi":"10.4337/9781789909876.00004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I dreamed that God and science were lenses of meaning that humans apply on the chaos of reality, in order to make sense. This dream helped me to realize what I wanted to achieve with this book. It is a kind of quest, a quest for meaning. Gaston Bachelard (1969a) points out that dreams and reverie are an occasion to focus on important symbols in a space less distracting and tumultuous than the everyday reality around us. Dreams are serious and should be treated seriously and sincerely. The symbols of my dream were riveting and enthralling, but they refused to tell a story. I need to stage them, to look for plots and invite characters in hope for a narrative ripple. That is why I do not stop with a tweet but go on to tell a story. Dreams are made of symbols. People craft symbols all the time, add, alter, share and drop them. Human civilizations pass on symbols, which are elements of these very complex lenses, between generations and places. This is systemic learning. Education is not just the formal schooling we pursue in modern societies, but everything that helps us to learn and pass on knowledge between generations (Ingold, 2018). Taken together – this “everything” is the lens of my dream: a fundamental sense-making mode of society. It does not mean that they are real or not, I am not discussing the existence of God or reliability of science in this book. I am concerned about the importance of sense-making systems and, especially, in a complex world, like ours, today. God of the Abrahamic religions (Armstrong, 1993, 2001), as well as the gods and goddesses of polytheistic religious systems (Hillman, 1997), have been a most powerful sense-making lens for humanity since ancient times. The Enlightenment added a second strong lens – a coherent and consensual system of science, based on paradigms (Kuhn, 1970). In more traditional and before-modern societies science was a part of the gods or of God. To learn, to explain, to think, was part of the divine order and there was a holy harmony or at least a significance of transcendental significance to be found or to lean one’s thinking against. Monotheistic Christianity, judging all other divinity as illegitimate competition, was adversely predisposed towards systems outside of its own body – magic, witchcraft, the creatures of folk tales, etc. were regarded as coming from the evil adversary of God. Then the Renaissance split God and science apart, and the latter started to compete more openly with the former. Modernity of the last century was marked by laicization. Some","PeriodicalId":368163,"journal":{"name":"The Imagined Organization","volume":"3 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Imagined Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789909876.00004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I dreamed that God and science were lenses of meaning that humans apply on the chaos of reality, in order to make sense. This dream helped me to realize what I wanted to achieve with this book. It is a kind of quest, a quest for meaning. Gaston Bachelard (1969a) points out that dreams and reverie are an occasion to focus on important symbols in a space less distracting and tumultuous than the everyday reality around us. Dreams are serious and should be treated seriously and sincerely. The symbols of my dream were riveting and enthralling, but they refused to tell a story. I need to stage them, to look for plots and invite characters in hope for a narrative ripple. That is why I do not stop with a tweet but go on to tell a story. Dreams are made of symbols. People craft symbols all the time, add, alter, share and drop them. Human civilizations pass on symbols, which are elements of these very complex lenses, between generations and places. This is systemic learning. Education is not just the formal schooling we pursue in modern societies, but everything that helps us to learn and pass on knowledge between generations (Ingold, 2018). Taken together – this “everything” is the lens of my dream: a fundamental sense-making mode of society. It does not mean that they are real or not, I am not discussing the existence of God or reliability of science in this book. I am concerned about the importance of sense-making systems and, especially, in a complex world, like ours, today. God of the Abrahamic religions (Armstrong, 1993, 2001), as well as the gods and goddesses of polytheistic religious systems (Hillman, 1997), have been a most powerful sense-making lens for humanity since ancient times. The Enlightenment added a second strong lens – a coherent and consensual system of science, based on paradigms (Kuhn, 1970). In more traditional and before-modern societies science was a part of the gods or of God. To learn, to explain, to think, was part of the divine order and there was a holy harmony or at least a significance of transcendental significance to be found or to lean one’s thinking against. Monotheistic Christianity, judging all other divinity as illegitimate competition, was adversely predisposed towards systems outside of its own body – magic, witchcraft, the creatures of folk tales, etc. were regarded as coming from the evil adversary of God. Then the Renaissance split God and science apart, and the latter started to compete more openly with the former. Modernity of the last century was marked by laicization. Some
导言:寻找第三个镜头
我梦见上帝和科学都是意义的透镜,人类将其应用于混沌的现实中,以便使其更有意义。这个梦让我明白了我想通过这本书达到的目的。这是一种追求,一种对意义的追求。加斯东-巴赫拉(Gaston Bachelard,1969a)指出,梦境和遐想是在一个比我们周围的日常现实更少干扰和动荡的空间中关注重要符号的机会。梦是严肃的,应该认真、真诚地对待。我梦中的符号引人入胜、令人着迷,但它们拒绝讲述一个故事。我需要为它们搭台,寻找情节,邀请人物,希望能产生叙事的波澜。这就是为什么我不会止步于一条微博,而是继续讲述一个故事。梦想是由符号构成的。人们无时无刻不在创造符号,添加、修改、分享和丢弃它们。人类文明在世代和地方之间传递着符号,它们是这些非常复杂的镜片的元素。这就是系统学习。教育不仅仅是我们在现代社会中接受的正规学校教育,也是帮助我们学习和在代际间传承知识的一切(Ingold,2018 年)。综合起来--这 "一切 "就是我梦想的透镜:社会的基本感知模式。这并不意味着它们真实与否,我在本书中并不讨论上帝的存在或科学的可靠性。我关注的是感知系统的重要性,尤其是在当今这样一个复杂的世界。亚伯拉罕宗教中的上帝(阿姆斯特朗,1993,2001),以及多神教体系中的诸神(希尔曼,1997),自古以来一直是人类最强大的感性视角。启蒙运动增加了第二个强有力的视角--以范式为基础的连贯一致的科学体系(库恩,1970 年)。在传统社会和现代社会之前,科学是神或上帝的一部分。学习、解释、思考都是神圣秩序的一部分,有一种神圣的和谐,或者至少有一种超验的意义可以找到,或者让人们的思考有所依托。一神教的基督教将所有其他神性都视为不正当的竞争者,对其本体之外的体系持否定态度--魔法、巫术、民间故事中的生物等都被视为来自上帝的邪恶对手。后来,文艺复兴将上帝与科学分开,后者开始更公开地与前者竞争。上世纪的现代性以世俗化为标志。一些
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信