Information about task duration influences energetic cost during split-belt adaptation and retention of walking patterns post-adaptation.

S Jeffcoat, A Aragon, A Kuch, S Farrokhi, A Hooyman, R Johnson, N Sanchez
{"title":"Information about task duration influences energetic cost during split-belt adaptation and retention of walking patterns post-adaptation.","authors":"S Jeffcoat, A Aragon, A Kuch, S Farrokhi, A Hooyman, R Johnson, N Sanchez","doi":"10.1101/2024.05.24.595558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies of locomotor adaptation have shown that adaptation can occur in short bouts and can continue for long bouts or across days. Information about task duration might influence the adaptation of gait features, given that task duration influences the time available to explore and adapt the aspects of gait that reduce energy cost. We hypothesized that information about task duration influences adaptation to split-belt walking based on two competing mechanisms: individuals anticipating a prolonged adaptation period may either (1) extend exploration of energetically suboptimal gait patterns, or (2) adapt toward a more energy-efficient pattern earlier to maintain an energetic reserve to sustain the task longer. We tested three groups: N=19 participants received minute-by-minute updates during a 10-minute adaptation duration (True group), N=19 participants received no updates during a 10-minute adaptation duration and were misled to expect a prolonged 30-minute adaptation duration (False group), and N=14 participants received one update halfway through a 10-minute adaptation duration (Control group). We measured step length asymmetry, leg work, and metabolic cost. Our results partially supported our hypothesis but did not confirm the underlying mechanisms. While step length asymmetry did not differ significantly between groups during adaptation, the True group generated a more effortful gait pattern with a greater increase in metabolic cost (p=0.002) and higher work with the leg on the slow belt (p=0.012). Additionally, the True group showed no association between step length asymmetry and metabolic cost (p=0.203), contrary to the Control (r=-0.55, p=0.043) and False groups (r=-0.51, p=0.027). Finally, we observed that the False group showed greater retention of the split-belt aftereffects than the Control and False groups (p<0.001). Thus, adapted locomotor and energetic patterns are influenced by information about task duration, indicating that Information about task duration should be controlled for, or can be manipulated to elicit different efforts during adaptation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72407,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11142228/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.24.595558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies of locomotor adaptation have shown that adaptation can occur in short bouts and can continue for long bouts or across days. Information about task duration might influence the adaptation of gait features, given that task duration influences the time available to explore and adapt the aspects of gait that reduce energy cost. We hypothesized that information about task duration influences adaptation to split-belt walking based on two competing mechanisms: individuals anticipating a prolonged adaptation period may either (1) extend exploration of energetically suboptimal gait patterns, or (2) adapt toward a more energy-efficient pattern earlier to maintain an energetic reserve to sustain the task longer. We tested three groups: N=19 participants received minute-by-minute updates during a 10-minute adaptation duration (True group), N=19 participants received no updates during a 10-minute adaptation duration and were misled to expect a prolonged 30-minute adaptation duration (False group), and N=14 participants received one update halfway through a 10-minute adaptation duration (Control group). We measured step length asymmetry, leg work, and metabolic cost. Our results partially supported our hypothesis but did not confirm the underlying mechanisms. While step length asymmetry did not differ significantly between groups during adaptation, the True group generated a more effortful gait pattern with a greater increase in metabolic cost (p=0.002) and higher work with the leg on the slow belt (p=0.012). Additionally, the True group showed no association between step length asymmetry and metabolic cost (p=0.203), contrary to the Control (r=-0.55, p=0.043) and False groups (r=-0.51, p=0.027). Finally, we observed that the False group showed greater retention of the split-belt aftereffects than the Control and False groups (p<0.001). Thus, adapted locomotor and energetic patterns are influenced by information about task duration, indicating that Information about task duration should be controlled for, or can be manipulated to elicit different efforts during adaptation.

对任务持续时间的感知会影响分带适应过程中的代谢成本以及适应和适应后的生物力学。
人类会不断调整运动模式。在实验室环境中,分带跑步机被用来研究运动适应性。在适应过程中,降低新陈代谢成本是主要目的还是观察到的生物力学变化的副产品尚不清楚。我们研究的主要目的是确定对任务持续时间的感知是否会影响运动模式的适应以降低能量成本。我们测试了这样一个假设,即认为自己将在分带适应任务中持续较长时间的个体将适应与较低成本相关的行走模式。14名参与者在知道剩余时间的情况下适应了10分钟(K组),而15名参与者在不知道已用时间或剩余时间的情况下假设他们将步行30分钟(U组)。两组的适应时间均为 10 分钟。我们观察到时间的主效应非常明显(p新,值得注意:如果个体认为他们必须长时间坚持这项任务,那么他们就能明显降低分带适应的新陈代谢成本。通常用于跟踪适应的变量并不能跟踪我们研究中观察到的代谢成本的降低。相信适应任务会持续很长时间也会影响运动模式的保持。在分带适应过程中,非生物力学策略对代谢成本有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信